These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15259323)

  • 1. A revised method for analysing neglect using the landmark task.
    Toraldo A; McIntosh RD; Dijkerman HC; Milner AD
    Cortex; 2004 Jun; 40(3):415-31. PubMed ID: 15259323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Disentangling perceptual and response bias in unilateral neglect: a methodological proposal.
    Toraldo A; McIntosh RD; Dijkerman HC; Milner AD
    Brain Cogn; 2002; 48(2-3):593-7. PubMed ID: 12030513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of the Milner and Bisiach Landmark Tasks: can neglect patients be classified consistently?
    Harvey M; Olk B
    Cortex; 2004; 40(4-5):659-65. PubMed ID: 15505976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The neural basis of perceptual bias and response bias in the Landmark task.
    Vossel S; Eschenbeck P; Weiss PH; Fink GR
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Nov; 48(13):3949-54. PubMed ID: 20875434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perceptual and response bias in unilateral neglect: two modified versions of the milner landmark task.
    Bisiach E; Ricci R; Lualdi M; Colombo MR
    Brain Cogn; 1998 Aug; 37(3):369-86. PubMed ID: 9733555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Perceptual and premotor neglect: is there an ideal task to categorise patients?
    Harvey M
    Cortex; 2004 Apr; 40(2):323-8. PubMed ID: 15156790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Categorisation of 'perceptual' and 'premotor' neglect patients across different tasks: is there strong evidence for a dichotomy?
    Harvey M; Krämer-McCaffery T; Dow L; Murphy PJ; Gilchrist ID
    Neuropsychologia; 2002; 40(8):1387-95. PubMed ID: 11931943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Visual awareness and anisometry of space representation in unilateral neglect: a panoramic investigation by means of a line extension task.
    Bisiach E; Ricci R; Mòdona MN
    Conscious Cogn; 1998 Sep; 7(3):327-55. PubMed ID: 9787049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Residual perceptual distortion in 'recovered' hemispatial neglect.
    Harvey M; Milner AD
    Neuropsychologia; 1999 Jun; 37(6):745-50. PubMed ID: 10390036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The traffic light paradigm: a reaction time task to study laterally directed arm movements.
    Bartolomeo P
    Brain Res Brain Res Protoc; 2002 Feb; 9(1):32-40. PubMed ID: 11852268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Image of a line is not shrunk but neglected. Absence of crossover in unilateral spatial neglect.
    Ishiai S; Koyama Y; Nakano N; Seki K; Nishida Y; Hayashi K
    Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(2):251-6. PubMed ID: 14644110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How many forms of perseveration? Evidence from cancellation tasks in right hemisphere patients.
    Gandola M; Toraldo A; Invernizzi P; Corrado L; Sberna M; Santilli I; Bottini G; Paulesu E
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Dec; 51(14):2960-75. PubMed ID: 24200919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Are drawing perseverations part of the neglect syndrome?
    Pia L; Folegatti A; Guagliardo M; Genero R; Gindri P
    Cortex; 2009 Mar; 45(3):293-9. PubMed ID: 18708186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Motor and perceptual factors in pseudoneglect.
    MacLeod MS; Turnbull OH
    Neuropsychologia; 1999 Jun; 37(6):707-13. PubMed ID: 10390032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of visible and invisible cueing on line bisection and Landmark performance in hemispatial neglect.
    Olk B; Harvey M
    Neuropsychologia; 2002; 40(3):282-90. PubMed ID: 11684161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Contralesional cross-over in chronic neglect: visual search patterns reveal neglect of the ipsilesional hemispace.
    Gall C; Günther T; Fuhrmans F; Sabel BA
    NeuroRehabilitation; 2012; 31(2):171-84. PubMed ID: 22951712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Perceptual and response-related components of unilateral neglect may evolve independently of one another: evidence from five single-case studies.
    Toraldo A; Laiacona M; Pagani R; Mandelli A; Capitani E
    Neurocase; 2014 Jun; 20(3):241-59. PubMed ID: 23157652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of illusory spatial anisometry in unilateral neglect.
    Ricci R; Pia L; Gindri P
    Exp Brain Res; 2004 Jan; 154(2):226-37. PubMed ID: 14557915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Two-dimensional distortion of space representation in unilateral neglect: perceptual and response-related factors.
    Bisiach E; Ricci R; Berruti G; Genero R; Pepi R; Fumelli T
    Neuropsychologia; 1999 Dec; 37(13):1491-8. PubMed ID: 10617269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Spatial and temporal dynamics of visual search tasks distinguish subtypes of unilateral spatial neglect: Comparison of two cases with viewer-centered and stimulus-centered neglect.
    Mizuno K; Kato K; Tsuji T; Shindo K; Kobayashi Y; Liu M
    Neuropsychol Rehabil; 2016 Aug; 26(4):610-34. PubMed ID: 26059555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.