291 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15259655)
1. Incorporation of an iterative, linear segmentation routine into a mammographic mass CAD system.
Catarious DM; Baydush AH; Floyd CE
Med Phys; 2004 Jun; 31(6):1512-20. PubMed ID: 15259655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A completely automated CAD system for mass detection in a large mammographic database.
Bellotti R; De Carlo F; Tangaro S; Gargano G; Maggipinto G; Castellano M; Massafra R; Cascio D; Fauci F; Magro R; Raso G; Lauria A; Forni G; Bagnasco S; Cerello P; Zanon E; Cheran SC; Lopez Torres E; Bottigli U; Masala GL; Oliva P; Retico A; Fantacci ME; Cataldo R; De Mitri I; De Nunzio G
Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):3066-75. PubMed ID: 16964885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mass detection in digital breast tomosynthesis: Deep convolutional neural network with transfer learning from mammography.
Samala RK; Chan HP; Hadjiiski L; Helvie MA; Wei J; Cha K
Med Phys; 2016 Dec; 43(12):6654. PubMed ID: 27908154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. False-positive reduction in computer-aided mass detection using mammographic texture analysis and classification.
Dhahbi S; Barhoumi W; Kurek J; Swiderski B; Kruk M; Zagrouba E
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Jul; 160():75-83. PubMed ID: 29728249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Computerized characterization of masses on mammograms: the rubber band straightening transform and texture analysis.
Sahiner B; Chan HP; Petrick N; Helvie MA; Goodsitt MM
Med Phys; 1998 Apr; 25(4):516-26. PubMed ID: 9571620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Computer-aided characterization of mammographic masses: accuracy of mass segmentation and its effects on characterization.
Sahiner B; Petrick N; Chan HP; Hadjiiski LM; Paramagul C; Helvie MA; Gurcan MN
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Dec; 20(12):1275-84. PubMed ID: 11811827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Computer-aided diagnosis: automatic detection of malignant masses in digitized mammograms.
Méndez AJ; Tahoces PG; Lado MJ; Souto M; Vidal JJ
Med Phys; 1998 Jun; 25(6):957-64. PubMed ID: 9650186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Computer-aided detection of breast masses on full field digital mammograms.
Wei J; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM; Chan HP; Petrick N; Helvie MA; Roubidoux MA; Ge J; Zhou C
Med Phys; 2005 Sep; 32(9):2827-38. PubMed ID: 16266097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Characterization of mammographic masses using a gradient-based segmentation algorithm and a neural classifier.
Delogu P; Evelina Fantacci M; Kasae P; Retico A
Comput Biol Med; 2007 Oct; 37(10):1479-91. PubMed ID: 17383623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Characterization of mammographic masses based on level set segmentation with new image features and patient information.
Shi J; Sahiner B; Chan HP; Ge J; Hadjiiski L; Helvie MA; Nees A; Wu YT; Wei J; Zhou C; Zhang Y; Cui J
Med Phys; 2008 Jan; 35(1):280-90. PubMed ID: 18293583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Breast masses detection using phase portrait analysis and fuzzy inference systems.
Mencattini A; Salmeri M
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2012 Jul; 7(4):573-83. PubMed ID: 21987360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Detection of breast masses in mammograms by density slicing and texture flow-field analysis.
Mudigonda NR; Rangayyan RM; Desautels JE
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Dec; 20(12):1215-27. PubMed ID: 11811822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A method to test the reproducibility and to improve performance of computer-aided detection schemes for digitized mammograms.
Zheng B; Gur D; Good WF; Hardesty LA
Med Phys; 2004 Nov; 31(11):2964-72. PubMed ID: 15587648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Computer-aided mass detection in mammography: false positive reduction via gray-scale invariant ranklet texture features.
Masotti M; Lanconelli N; Campanini R
Med Phys; 2009 Feb; 36(2):311-6. PubMed ID: 19291970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A genetic algorithm-based method for optimizing the performance of a computer-aided diagnosis scheme for detection of clustered microcalcifications in mammograms.
Anastasio MA; Yoshida H; Nagel R; Nishikawa RM; Doi K
Med Phys; 1998 Sep; 25(9):1613-20. PubMed ID: 9775365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. False-positive reduction technique for detection of masses on digital mammograms: global and local multiresolution texture analysis.
Wei D; Chan HP; Petrick N; Sahiner B; Helvie MA; Adler DD; Goodsitt MM
Med Phys; 1997 Jun; 24(6):903-14. PubMed ID: 9198026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Using computer-extracted image features for modeling of error-making patterns in detection of mammographic masses among radiology residents.
Zhang J; Lo JY; Kuzmiak CM; Ghate SV; Yoon SC; Mazurowski MA
Med Phys; 2014 Sep; 41(9):091907. PubMed ID: 25186394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Computer-assisted detection of mammographic masses: a template matching scheme based on mutual information.
Tourassi GD; Vargas-Voracek R; Catarious DM; Floyd CE
Med Phys; 2003 Aug; 30(8):2123-30. PubMed ID: 12945977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Computer-aided detection; the effect of training databases on detection of subtle breast masses.
Zheng B; Wang X; Lederman D; Tan J; Gur D
Acad Radiol; 2010 Nov; 17(11):1401-8. PubMed ID: 20650667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Use of border information in the classification of mammographic masses.
Varela C; Timp S; Karssemeijer N
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Jan; 51(2):425-41. PubMed ID: 16394348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
