These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15260194)

  • 1. Prioritizing new elements with a brief preview period: evidence against visual marking.
    Donk M; Verburg RC
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2004 Apr; 11(2):282-8. PubMed ID: 15260194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Blink and you won't miss it: the preview benefit in visual marking survives internally generated eyeblinks.
    von Mühlenen A; Watson D; Gunnell DO
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Oct; 39(5):1279-90. PubMed ID: 23398259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prioritizing selection of new elements: bottom-up versus top-down control.
    Donk M; Theeuwes J
    Percept Psychophys; 2003 Nov; 65(8):1231-42. PubMed ID: 14710958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Visual marking beside the mark: prioritizing selection by abrupt onsets.
    Donk M; Theeuwes J
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 Jul; 63(5):891-900. PubMed ID: 11521854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prioritization by transients in visual search.
    Belopolsky AV; Theeuwes J; Kramer AF
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2005 Feb; 12(1):93-9. PubMed ID: 15948285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An onset advantage without a preview benefit: neuropsychological evidence separating onset and preview effects in search.
    Humphreys GW; Olivers CN; Yoon EY
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Jan; 18(1):110-20. PubMed ID: 16417687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Resisting change: the influence of luminance changes on visual marking and the preview benefit.
    Watson DG; Braithwaite JJ; Humphreys GW
    Percept Psychophys; 2008 Nov; 70(8):1526-39. PubMed ID: 19064495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The time course of preview search with color-defined, not luminance-defined, stimuli.
    Humphreys GW; Olivers CN; Braithwaite JJ
    Percept Psychophys; 2006 Nov; 68(8):1351-8. PubMed ID: 17378420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prioritized selection in visual search through onset capture and color inhibition: evidence from a probe-dot detection task.
    Agter F; Donk M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Aug; 31(4):722-30. PubMed ID: 16131245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Visual marking of moving objects: a role for top-down feature-based inhibition in selection.
    Watson DG; Humphreys GW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1998 Jun; 24(3):946-62. PubMed ID: 9627427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of luminance change in preview search: offsets and onsets can be concurrently prioritized but not in isolation.
    Donk M; Agter F; Pratt J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Mar; 130(3):260-7. PubMed ID: 19261261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Contingent visual marking by transients.
    Peterson MS; Belopolsky AV; Kramer AF
    Percept Psychophys; 2003 Jul; 65(5):695-710. PubMed ID: 12956578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Temporal Binding and Segmentation in Visual Search: A Computational Neuroscience Analysis.
    Mavritsaki E; Humphreys G
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2016 Oct; 28(10):1553-67. PubMed ID: 27243617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Revisiting preview search at isoluminance: new onsets are not necessary for the preview advantage.
    Braithwaite JJ; Humphreys GW; Watson DG; Hulleman J
    Percept Psychophys; 2005 Oct; 67(7):1214-28. PubMed ID: 16502843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Visual marking: the effects of irrelevant changes on preview search.
    Watson DG; Humphreys GW
    Percept Psychophys; 2005 Apr; 67(3):418-34. PubMed ID: 16119391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Visual marking across eye blinks.
    Irwin DE; Humphreys GW
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2013 Feb; 20(1):128-34. PubMed ID: 23073720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Visual marking: a convergence of goal- and stimulus-driven processes during visual search.
    Atchley P; Jones SE; Hoffman L
    Percept Psychophys; 2003 Jul; 65(5):667-77. PubMed ID: 12956576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Selection of new objects by onset capture and visual marking.
    Osugi T; Hayashi D; Murakami I
    Vision Res; 2016 May; 122():21-33. PubMed ID: 27001341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Is it impossible to inhibit isoluminant items, or does it simply take longer? Evidence from preview search.
    Braithwaite JJ; Hulleman J; Watson DG; Humphreys GW
    Percept Psychophys; 2006 Feb; 68(2):290-300. PubMed ID: 16773900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An analysis of the time course of attention in preview search.
    Humphreys GW; Stalmann BJ; Olivers C
    Percept Psychophys; 2004 Jul; 66(5):713-30. PubMed ID: 15495898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.