These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15260204)

  • 1. Evidence accumulation in decision making: unifying the "take the best" and the "rational" models.
    Lee MD; Cummins TD
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2004 Apr; 11(2):343-52. PubMed ID: 15260204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Additional information is not ignored: New evidence for information integration and inhibition in take-the-best decisions.
    Dummel S; Rummel J; Voss A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2016 Jan; 163():167-84. PubMed ID: 26687019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing the empirical validity of the "take-the-best" heuristic as a model of human probabilistic inference.
    Bröder A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2000 Sep; 26(5):1332-46. PubMed ID: 11009261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Take-the-best and the influence of decision-inconsistent attributes on decision confidence and choices in memory-based decisions.
    Dummel S; Rummel J
    Memory; 2016 Nov; 24(10):1435-43. PubMed ID: 26642913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A response-time approach to comparing generalized rational and take-the-best models of decision making.
    Bergert FB; Nosofsky RM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Jan; 33(1):107-29. PubMed ID: 17201556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Single-process versus multiple-strategy models of decision making: evidence from an information intrusion paradigm.
    Söllner A; Bröder A; Glöckner A; Betsch T
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Feb; 146():84-96. PubMed ID: 24441266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. From information processing to decisions: Formalizing and comparing psychologically plausible choice models.
    Heck DW; Hilbig BE; Moshagen M
    Cogn Psychol; 2017 Aug; 96():26-40. PubMed ID: 28601709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. When one cue is not enough: combining fast and frugal heuristics with compound cue processing.
    Garcia-Retamero R; Hoffrage U; Dieckmann A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Sep; 60(9):1197-215. PubMed ID: 17676553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Neural Signatures of Rational and Heuristic Choice Strategies: A Single Trial ERP Analysis.
    Wichary S; Magnuski M; Oleksy T; Brzezicka A
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2017; 11():401. PubMed ID: 28867996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Automatic activation of attribute knowledge in heuristic inference from memory.
    Khader PH; Pachur T; Jost K
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2013 Apr; 20(2):372-7. PubMed ID: 23132606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Decision making under uncertainty: a comparison of simple scalability, fixed-sample, and sequential-sampling models.
    Busemeyer JR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1985 Jul; 11(3):538-64. PubMed ID: 3160815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sequential processing of cues in memory-based multiattribute decisions.
    Bröder A; Gaissmaier W
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2007 Oct; 14(5):895-900. PubMed ID: 18087956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Take the best versus simultaneous feature matching: probabilistic inferences from memory and effects of representation format.
    Bröder A; Schiffer S
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2003 Jun; 132(2):277-93. PubMed ID: 12825641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Take the best or look at the rest? Factors influencing "one-reason" decision making.
    Newell BR; Shanks DR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Jan; 29(1):53-65. PubMed ID: 12549583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Neural signatures of experience-based improvements in deterministic decision-making.
    Tremel JJ; Laurent PA; Wolk DA; Wheeler ME; Fiez JA
    Behav Brain Res; 2016 Dec; 315():51-65. PubMed ID: 27523644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Manipulating memory efficacy affects the behavioral and neural profiles of deterministic learning and decision-making.
    Tremel JJ; Ortiz DM; Fiez JA
    Neuropsychologia; 2018 Jun; 114():214-230. PubMed ID: 29705066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Subjective confidence in perceptual judgments: a test of the self-consistency model.
    Koriat A
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2011 Feb; 140(1):117-39. PubMed ID: 21299320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reasoning the fast and frugal way: models of bounded rationality.
    Gigerenzer G; Goldstein DG
    Psychol Rev; 1996 Oct; 103(4):650-69. PubMed ID: 8888650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Rational learning and information sampling: on the "naivety" assumption in sampling explanations of judgment biases.
    Le Mens G; Denrell J
    Psychol Rev; 2011 Apr; 118(2):379-92. PubMed ID: 21480741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Adaptive decision making in a dynamic environment: a test of a sequential sampling model of relative judgment.
    Vuckovic A; Kwantes PJ; Neal A
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2013 Sep; 19(3):266-84. PubMed ID: 24059826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.