These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. The doctor as double agent. Rich BA Pain Med; 2005; 6(5):393-5; discussion 396. PubMed ID: 16266362 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The fiduciary covenantal relationship: a model for physician-patient relationships. Suits GS Ethics Med; 2003; 19(1):35-44. PubMed ID: 14700044 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [The mutual trust between physicians and their patients: not only in principle, but also in reality]. Muzny P Rev Med Suisse; 2007 Dec; 3(136):2806-8. PubMed ID: 18183817 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Medicus homo est. Monitoring medical error. Collegium Medicum Uniwersytetu Jagielloskiego]. Stachura J Folia Med Cracov; 2004; 45 Spec No():5-6. PubMed ID: 15810539 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Physician integrity: why it is inviolable. Pellegrino ED Hastings Cent Rep; 2009; Suppl():18-20. PubMed ID: 19891271 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Dual agency and fiduciary responsibilities in modern medicine. Carr VF Physician Exec; 2005; 31(6):56-8. PubMed ID: 16382654 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Patient trust. Trust remains fundamental to the ethical practice of medicine even in the age of the patient as consumer. Berlinger N Minn Med; 2004 Jun; 87(6):32-4. PubMed ID: 15287621 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Professionalism, ethics, and trust. Geier GR Minn Med; 2007 Jun; 90(6):20. PubMed ID: 17621915 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Ethics in medical profession. Chaudhuri SK J Indian Med Assoc; 2010 Apr; 108(4):252. PubMed ID: 21117285 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Professionalism in medicine: the new authority. Oliva A Physician Exec; 2005; 31(2):40-4. PubMed ID: 15844799 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Whom should the patient trust? A friendly report to Kevin Wildes. Pellegrino ED; Harvey JC America (NY); 2001 Oct; 185(9):19, 22-3. PubMed ID: 11878323 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The Indian Medical Council (professional conduct, etiquette and ethics) regulations, 2002. Issues Med Ethics; 2002; 10(3):66-70. PubMed ID: 16335489 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Negotiated or taken-for-granted trust? Explicit and implicit interpretations of trust in a medical setting. Skirbekk H Med Health Care Philos; 2009 Mar; 12(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 18512132 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bill 114: who broke trust? Vogel M CMAJ; 2002 Nov; 167(11):1228. PubMed ID: 12451063 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Taking a second look: some opinions on the second opinion. Pandya SK Issues Med Ethics; 1998 Jan; 6(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 16267920 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Excerpts from: On the take. Kassirer JP Physician Exec; 2005; 31(2):28-32. PubMed ID: 15844796 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The fiduciary obligation of physicians to "just say no" if an "informed" patient demands services that are not medically indicated. Hafemeister TL; Gulbrandsen RM Seton Hall Law Rev; 2009; 39(2):335-86. PubMed ID: 19462539 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Agency problems, ethical challenges and governance attributes in different models of physician-patient interaction within the assisted reproduction setting. Tofan G; Spraggon M; Bodolica V Public Health; 2013 Jun; 127(6):597-600. PubMed ID: 23680579 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]