These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1526051)
1. A new modification of the Rinne test. Johnston DF Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci; 1992 Aug; 17(4):322-6. PubMed ID: 1526051 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Rinne tuning fork test. Swan IR Hosp Pract (Off Ed); 1989 Sep; 24(9A):99-102. PubMed ID: 2506208 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Observations on the Rinne test. Haughton PM; Pearce JM Lancet; 1982 Apr; 1(8276):829-30. PubMed ID: 6122058 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. C1-tuning fork tests in school-aged children. Haapaniemi JJ; Suonpää JT; Salmivalli AJ; Virolainen ES Auris Nasus Larynx; 1996; 23():26-32. PubMed ID: 8809320 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical utility of the 512-Hz Rinne tuning fork test. Burkey JM; Lippy WH; Schuring AG; Rizer FM Am J Otol; 1998 Jan; 19(1):59-62. PubMed ID: 9455950 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Rinne revisited: steel versus aluminum tuning forks. MacKechnie CA; Greenberg JJ; Gerkin RC; McCall AA; Hirsch BE; Durrant JD; Raz Y Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2013 Dec; 149(6):907-13. PubMed ID: 24085711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Combined tuning fork tests in hearing loss: explorative clinical study of the patterns. Vikram KB; Naseeruddin K J Otolaryngol; 2004 Aug; 33(4):227-34. PubMed ID: 15903203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Rinne test for conductive deafness. A critical reappraisal. Chole RA; Cook GB Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1988 Apr; 114(4):399-403. PubMed ID: 3348896 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The early descriptions of the so-called tuning-fork tests of Weber, Rinne, Schwabach, and Bing. II. The "Rhine Test" and its first description by Polansky. Huizing EH ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 1975; 37(2):88-91. PubMed ID: 1093081 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Patterns of hearing loss in tympanic membrane perforation resulting from physical blow to the ear: a prospective controlled cohort study. Orji FT; Agu CC Clin Otolaryngol; 2009 Dec; 34(6):526-32. PubMed ID: 20070761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The otologist's tuning fork examination--are you striking it correctly? Stevens JR; Pfannenstiel TJ Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2015 Mar; 152(3):477-9. PubMed ID: 25475500 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Can Rinne's test quantify hearing loss? Jacob V; Alexander P; Nalinesha KM; Nayar RC Ear Nose Throat J; 1993 Feb; 72(2):152-3. PubMed ID: 8482257 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A Smartphone-Based Weber Test May Discriminate between a Conductive and a Sensorineural Hearing Loss. Ungar OJ; Handzel O; Cavel O; Oron Y Audiol Neurootol; 2019; 24(4):191-196. PubMed ID: 31480043 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Tuning fork study in deafness. Thus function Rinne and Weber tests]. Ziemer C MMW Fortschr Med; 2006 Apr; 148(15):18. PubMed ID: 16711196 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Identification of conductive hearing loss using air conduction tests alone: reliability and validity of an automatic test battery. Convery E; Keidser G; Seeto M; Freeston K; Zhou D; Dillon H Ear Hear; 2014; 35(1):e1-8. PubMed ID: 24080948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Rinne test: does the tuning fork position affect the sound amplitude at the ear? Butskiy O; Ng D; Hodgson M; Nunez DA J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2016 Mar; 45():21. PubMed ID: 27013057 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]