These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

581 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15262159)

  • 1. Fungal spore source strength tester: laboratory evaluation of a new concept.
    Sivasubramani SK; Niemeier RT; Reponen T; Grinshpun SA
    Sci Total Environ; 2004 Aug; 329(1-3):75-86. PubMed ID: 15262159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessment of the aerosolization potential for fungal spores in moldy homes.
    Sivasubramani SK; Niemeier RT; Reponen T; Grinshpun SA
    Indoor Air; 2004 Dec; 14(6):405-12. PubMed ID: 15500633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Size-fractionated (1-->3)-beta-D-glucan concentrations aerosolized from different moldy building materials.
    Seo SC; Reponen T; Levin L; Grinshpun SA
    Sci Total Environ; 2009 Jan; 407(2):806-14. PubMed ID: 19012949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Chamber evaluation of a personal, bioaerosol cyclone sampler.
    Macher J; Chen B; Rao C
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2008 Nov; 5(11):702-12. PubMed ID: 18720289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of two aerosolization methods on the release of fungal propagules from a contaminated agar surface.
    Górny RL; Ławniczek-Wałczyk A
    Ann Agric Environ Med; 2012; 19(2):279-84. PubMed ID: 22742802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Release and characteristics of fungal fragments in various conditions.
    Mensah-Attipoe J; Saari S; Veijalainen AM; Pasanen P; Keskinen J; Leskinen JTT; Reponen T
    Sci Total Environ; 2016 Mar; 547():234-243. PubMed ID: 26789361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Field evaluation of nanofilm detectors for measuring acidic particles in indoor and outdoor air.
    Cohen BS; Heikkinen MS; Hazi Y; Gao H; Peters P; Lippmann M
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2004 Sep; (121):1-35; discussion 37-46. PubMed ID: 15553489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Characterization of microbial particle release from biomass and building material surfaces for inhalation exposure risk assessment.
    Madsen AM; Kruse P; Schneider T
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2006 Mar; 50(2):175-87. PubMed ID: 16354741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A two-stage cyclone using microcentrifuge tubes for personal bioaerosol sampling.
    Lindsley WG; Schmechel D; Chen BT
    J Environ Monit; 2006 Nov; 8(11):1136-42. PubMed ID: 17075620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Total airborne mold particle sampling: evaluation of sample collection, preparation and counting procedures, and collection devices.
    Godish D; Godish T
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2008 Feb; 5(2):100-6. PubMed ID: 18085480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluating fungal populations by genera/species on wide body commercial passenger aircraft and in airport terminals.
    McKernan LT; Burge H; Wallingford KM; Hein MJ; Herrick R
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2007 Apr; 51(3):281-91. PubMed ID: 17351266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Performance of personal inhalable aerosol samplers in very slowly moving air when facing the aerosol source.
    Witschger O; Grinshpun SA; Fauvel S; Basso G
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2004 Jun; 48(4):351-68. PubMed ID: 15191944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of fungal species, cultivation time, growth substrate, and air exposure velocity on the fluorescence properties of airborne fungal spores.
    Saari S; Mensah-Attipoe J; Reponen T; Veijalainen AM; Salmela A; Pasanen P; Keskinen J
    Indoor Air; 2015 Dec; 25(6):653-61. PubMed ID: 25292152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A small change in the design of a slit bioaerosol impactor significantly improves its collection characteristics.
    Grinshpun SA; Adhikari A; Cho SH; Kim KY; Lee T; Reponen T
    J Environ Monit; 2007 Aug; 9(8):855-61. PubMed ID: 17671667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Verifying interpretive criteria for bioaerosol data using (bootstrap) Monte Carlo techniques.
    Spicer RC; Gangloff H
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2008 Feb; 5(2):85-93. PubMed ID: 18075881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of a high-volume portable bioaerosol sampler in laboratory and field environments.
    An HR; Mainelis G; Yao M
    Indoor Air; 2004 Dec; 14(6):385-93. PubMed ID: 15500631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Airborne viable, non-viable, and allergenic fungi in a rural agricultural area of India: a 2-year study at five outdoor sampling stations.
    Adhikari A; Sen MM; Gupta-Bhattacharya S; Chanda S
    Sci Total Environ; 2004 Jun; 326(1-3):123-41. PubMed ID: 15142771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Aerosolization of particulate (1-->3)-beta-D-glucan from moldy materials.
    Seo SC; Reponen T; Levin L; Borchelt T; Grinshpun SA
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2008 Feb; 74(3):585-93. PubMed ID: 18065630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of fungal contamination in moldy homes: comparison of different methods.
    Niemeier RT; Sivasubramani SK; Reponen T; Grinshpun SA
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2006 May; 3(5):262-73. PubMed ID: 16595378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Profile and Morphology of Fungal Aerosols Characterized by Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscopy (FESEM).
    Afanou KA; Straumfors A; Skogstad A; Skaar I; Hjeljord L; Skare Ø; Green BJ; Tronsmo A; Eduard W
    Aerosol Sci Technol; 2015; 49(6):423-435. PubMed ID: 26855468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 30.