131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15262799)
1. Finding disease specific alterations in the co-expression of genes.
Kostka D; Spang R
Bioinformatics; 2004 Aug; 20 Suppl 1():i194-9. PubMed ID: 15262799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of replacing the unreliable cDNA microarray measurements on the disease classification based on gene expression profiles and functional modules.
Wang D; Lv Y; Guo Z; Li X; Li Y; Zhu J; Yang D; Xu J; Wang C; Rao S; Yang B
Bioinformatics; 2006 Dec; 22(23):2883-9. PubMed ID: 16809389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Independent component analysis-based penalized discriminant method for tumor classification using gene expression data.
Huang DS; Zheng CH
Bioinformatics; 2006 Aug; 22(15):1855-62. PubMed ID: 16709589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Detecting common gene expression patterns in multiple cancer outcome entities.
Yang X; Bentink S; Spang R
Biomed Microdevices; 2005 Sep; 7(3):247-51. PubMed ID: 16133813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Kalman filtering for disease-state estimation from microarray data.
Kelemen JZ; Kertész-Farkas A; Kocsor A; Puskás LG
Bioinformatics; 2006 Dec; 22(24):3047-53. PubMed ID: 17065158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Annotation-based distance measures for patient subgroup discovery in clinical microarray studies.
Lottaz C; Toedling J; Spang R
Bioinformatics; 2007 Sep; 23(17):2256-64. PubMed ID: 17586546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Gene selection in cancer classification using sparse logistic regression with Bayesian regularization.
Cawley GC; Talbot NL
Bioinformatics; 2006 Oct; 22(19):2348-55. PubMed ID: 16844704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Structured polychotomous machine diagnosis of multiple cancer types using gene expression.
Koo JY; Sohn I; Kim S; Lee JW
Bioinformatics; 2006 Apr; 22(8):950-8. PubMed ID: 16452113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ensemble dependence model for classification and prediction of cancer and normal gene expression data.
Qiu P; Wang ZJ; Liu KJ
Bioinformatics; 2005 Jul; 21(14):3114-21. PubMed ID: 15879455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Meta-analysis of gene expression data: a predictor-based approach.
Fishel I; Kaufman A; Ruppin E
Bioinformatics; 2007 Jul; 23(13):1599-606. PubMed ID: 17463023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Classification of intramural metastases and lymph node metastases of esophageal cancer from gene expression based on boosting and projective adaptive resonance theory.
Takahashi H; Aoyagi K; Nakanishi Y; Sasaki H; Yoshida T; Honda H
J Biosci Bioeng; 2006 Jul; 102(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 16952836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Algorithm to find gene expression profiles of deregulation and identify families of disease-altered genes.
Prieto C; Rivas MJ; Sánchez JM; López-Fidalgo J; De Las Rivas J
Bioinformatics; 2006 May; 22(9):1103-10. PubMed ID: 16500942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ovarian cancer identification based on dimensionality reduction for high-throughput mass spectrometry data.
Yu JS; Ongarello S; Fiedler R; Chen XW; Toffolo G; Cobelli C; Trajanoski Z
Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 21(10):2200-9. PubMed ID: 15784749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Large scale data mining approach for gene-specific standardization of microarray gene expression data.
Yoon S; Yang Y; Choi J; Seong J
Bioinformatics; 2006 Dec; 22(23):2898-904. PubMed ID: 17032674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The linear neuron as marker selector and clinical predictor in cancer gene analysis.
Blazadonakis ME; Zervakis M
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2008 Jul; 91(1):22-35. PubMed ID: 18423925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. FM-test: a fuzzy-set-theory-based approach to differential gene expression data analysis.
Liang LR; Lu S; Wang X; Lu Y; Mandal V; Patacsil D; Kumar D
BMC Bioinformatics; 2006 Dec; 7 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):S7. PubMed ID: 17217525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A combination of rough-based feature selection and RBF neural network for classification using gene expression data.
Chiang JH; Ho SH
IEEE Trans Nanobioscience; 2008 Mar; 7(1):91-9. PubMed ID: 18334459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Robust prostate cancer marker genes emerge from direct integration of inter-study microarray data.
Xu L; Tan AC; Naiman DQ; Geman D; Winslow RL
Bioinformatics; 2005 Oct; 21(20):3905-11. PubMed ID: 16131522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Gene selection via the BAHSIC family of algorithms.
Song L; Bedo J; Borgwardt KM; Gretton A; Smola A
Bioinformatics; 2007 Jul; 23(13):i490-8. PubMed ID: 17646335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Predicting survival from microarray data--a comparative study.
Bøvelstad HM; Nygård S; Størvold HL; Aldrin M; Borgan Ø; Frigessi A; Lingjaerde OC
Bioinformatics; 2007 Aug; 23(16):2080-7. PubMed ID: 17553857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
