These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15266732)

  • 1. Dental fracture fragment attachment: fracture model and luting agent comparisons.
    Dean JA; Bullard G; Long RW; Moore BK; McDonald SM
    J Indiana Dent Assoc; 2004; 83(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 15266732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Performance of techniques used for re-attachment of endodontically treated crown fractured teeth.
    Loguercio AD; Leski G; Sossmeier D; Kraul A; Oda M; Patzlaff RT; Reis A
    J Dent; 2008 Apr; 36(4):249-55. PubMed ID: 18308450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Re-attachment of anterior fractured teeth: fracture strength using different materials.
    Reis A; Kraul A; Francci C; de Assis TG; Crivelli DD; Oda M; Loguercio AD
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(6):621-7. PubMed ID: 12413229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fracture resistance of anterior teeth restored with a novel nonmetallic post.
    Abo El-Ela OA; Atta OA; El-Mowafy O
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2008 Jun; 74(5):441. PubMed ID: 18538068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Re-attachment of anterior fractured teeth: fracture strength using different techniques.
    Reis A; Francci C; Loguercio AD; Carrilho MR; Rodriques Filho LE
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(3):287-94. PubMed ID: 11357572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fracture strength of fragment-bonded teeth. Effect of calcium hydroxide lining before bonding.
    Farik B; Munksgaard EC; Andreasen JO
    Am J Dent; 2000 Apr; 13(2):98-100. PubMed ID: 11764835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effects of cavity preparation and lamination on bond strength and fracture of tooth-colored restorations in primary molars.
    Suwatviroj P; Messer LB; Palamara JE
    Pediatr Dent; 2003; 25(6):534-40. PubMed ID: 14733466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with different post systems using new-generation adhesives.
    Kivanç BH; Görgül G
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Nov; 9(7):33-40. PubMed ID: 18997914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dentine bond strength and microleakage of flowable composite, compomer and glass ionomer cement.
    Xie H; Zhang F; Wu Y; Chen C; Liu W
    Aust Dent J; 2008 Dec; 53(4):325-31. PubMed ID: 19133948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reattachment of rehydrated dental fragment using two techniques.
    Capp CI; Roda MI; Tamaki R; Castanho GM; Camargo MA; de Cara AA
    Dent Traumatol; 2009 Feb; 25(1):95-9. PubMed ID: 19208019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The influence of adhesive luting systems on bond strength and failure mode of an indirect micro ceramic resin-based composite veneer.
    Sarabi N; Ghavamnasiri M; Forooghbakhsh A
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 Jan; 10(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 19142254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of fractured or sectioned fragments on the fracture strength of different reattachment techniques.
    Loguercio AD; Mengarda J; Amaral R; Kraul A; Reis A
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(3):295-300. PubMed ID: 15195730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fracture resistance of reattached incisor fragments with mini fibre-reinforced composite anchors.
    Fennis WM; Kreulen CM; Wolke JG; Fokkinga WA; Machado C; Creugers NH
    J Dent; 2009 Jun; 37(6):462-7. PubMed ID: 19339099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fracture resistance of tooth fragment reattachment: effects of different preparation techniques and adhesive materials.
    Pusman E; Cehreli ZC; Altay N; Unver B; Saracbasi O; Ozgun G
    Dent Traumatol; 2010 Feb; 26(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 20089057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Rehabilitation to crown-root fracture by fragment reattachment with resin-modified glass ionomer cement and composite resin restoration.
    Jardim Pdos S; Negri MR; Masotti AS
    Dent Traumatol; 2010 Apr; 26(2):186-90. PubMed ID: 20486948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of an adhesive resin luting agent on the dowel-head retention of three different core materials.
    Aksoy G; Cotert HS; Korkut L
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 May; 93(5):439-45. PubMed ID: 15867753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of a hybrid light-cured glass-ionomer base and liner vs. a light-cured resin tooth fragment attachment.
    Dean JA; Minutillo AL; Moore BK
    Pediatr Dent; 1998; 20(1):49-52. PubMed ID: 9524973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of shear bond strength of composite, compomer and resin modified glass ionomer in primary and permanent teeth: an in vitro study.
    Prabhakar AR; Raj S; Raju OS
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2003 Sep; 21(3):86-94. PubMed ID: 14703213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Extrusion shear strength between an alumina-based ceramic and three different cements.
    Borges GA; de Goes MF; Platt JA; Moore K; de Menezes FH; Vedovato E
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Sep; 98(3):208-15. PubMed ID: 17854622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fracture resistance of crowned incisors with different post systems and luting agents.
    Gu XH; Kern M
    J Oral Rehabil; 2006 Dec; 33(12):918-23. PubMed ID: 17168934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.