BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15266732)

  • 1. Dental fracture fragment attachment: fracture model and luting agent comparisons.
    Dean JA; Bullard G; Long RW; Moore BK; McDonald SM
    J Indiana Dent Assoc; 2004; 83(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 15266732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Performance of techniques used for re-attachment of endodontically treated crown fractured teeth.
    Loguercio AD; Leski G; Sossmeier D; Kraul A; Oda M; Patzlaff RT; Reis A
    J Dent; 2008 Apr; 36(4):249-55. PubMed ID: 18308450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Re-attachment of anterior fractured teeth: fracture strength using different materials.
    Reis A; Kraul A; Francci C; de Assis TG; Crivelli DD; Oda M; Loguercio AD
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(6):621-7. PubMed ID: 12413229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fracture resistance of anterior teeth restored with a novel nonmetallic post.
    Abo El-Ela OA; Atta OA; El-Mowafy O
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2008 Jun; 74(5):441. PubMed ID: 18538068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Re-attachment of anterior fractured teeth: fracture strength using different techniques.
    Reis A; Francci C; Loguercio AD; Carrilho MR; Rodriques Filho LE
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(3):287-94. PubMed ID: 11357572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fracture strength of fragment-bonded teeth. Effect of calcium hydroxide lining before bonding.
    Farik B; Munksgaard EC; Andreasen JO
    Am J Dent; 2000 Apr; 13(2):98-100. PubMed ID: 11764835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effects of cavity preparation and lamination on bond strength and fracture of tooth-colored restorations in primary molars.
    Suwatviroj P; Messer LB; Palamara JE
    Pediatr Dent; 2003; 25(6):534-40. PubMed ID: 14733466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with different post systems using new-generation adhesives.
    Kivanç BH; Görgül G
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Nov; 9(7):33-40. PubMed ID: 18997914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dentine bond strength and microleakage of flowable composite, compomer and glass ionomer cement.
    Xie H; Zhang F; Wu Y; Chen C; Liu W
    Aust Dent J; 2008 Dec; 53(4):325-31. PubMed ID: 19133948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reattachment of rehydrated dental fragment using two techniques.
    Capp CI; Roda MI; Tamaki R; Castanho GM; Camargo MA; de Cara AA
    Dent Traumatol; 2009 Feb; 25(1):95-9. PubMed ID: 19208019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The influence of adhesive luting systems on bond strength and failure mode of an indirect micro ceramic resin-based composite veneer.
    Sarabi N; Ghavamnasiri M; Forooghbakhsh A
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 Jan; 10(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 19142254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of fractured or sectioned fragments on the fracture strength of different reattachment techniques.
    Loguercio AD; Mengarda J; Amaral R; Kraul A; Reis A
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(3):295-300. PubMed ID: 15195730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fracture resistance of reattached incisor fragments with mini fibre-reinforced composite anchors.
    Fennis WM; Kreulen CM; Wolke JG; Fokkinga WA; Machado C; Creugers NH
    J Dent; 2009 Jun; 37(6):462-7. PubMed ID: 19339099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fracture resistance of tooth fragment reattachment: effects of different preparation techniques and adhesive materials.
    Pusman E; Cehreli ZC; Altay N; Unver B; Saracbasi O; Ozgun G
    Dent Traumatol; 2010 Feb; 26(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 20089057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Rehabilitation to crown-root fracture by fragment reattachment with resin-modified glass ionomer cement and composite resin restoration.
    Jardim Pdos S; Negri MR; Masotti AS
    Dent Traumatol; 2010 Apr; 26(2):186-90. PubMed ID: 20486948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of an adhesive resin luting agent on the dowel-head retention of three different core materials.
    Aksoy G; Cotert HS; Korkut L
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 May; 93(5):439-45. PubMed ID: 15867753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of a hybrid light-cured glass-ionomer base and liner vs. a light-cured resin tooth fragment attachment.
    Dean JA; Minutillo AL; Moore BK
    Pediatr Dent; 1998; 20(1):49-52. PubMed ID: 9524973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of shear bond strength of composite, compomer and resin modified glass ionomer in primary and permanent teeth: an in vitro study.
    Prabhakar AR; Raj S; Raju OS
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2003 Sep; 21(3):86-94. PubMed ID: 14703213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Extrusion shear strength between an alumina-based ceramic and three different cements.
    Borges GA; de Goes MF; Platt JA; Moore K; de Menezes FH; Vedovato E
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Sep; 98(3):208-15. PubMed ID: 17854622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fracture resistance of crowned incisors with different post systems and luting agents.
    Gu XH; Kern M
    J Oral Rehabil; 2006 Dec; 33(12):918-23. PubMed ID: 17168934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.