202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15266732)
21. An evaluation of various materials and tooth preparation designs used for reattachment of fractured incisors.
Bhargava M; Pandit IK; Srivastava N; Gugnani N; Gupta M
Dent Traumatol; 2010 Oct; 26(5):409-12. PubMed ID: 20831637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Fracture strength of tooth fragment reattachments with postpone bevel and overcontour reconstruction.
Stellini E; Stomaci D; Stomaci M; Petrone N; Favero L
Dent Traumatol; 2008 Jun; 24(3):283-8. PubMed ID: 18489478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Fracture load of composite resin and feldspathic all-ceramic CAD/CAM crowns.
Attia A; Abdelaziz KM; Freitag S; Kern M
J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Feb; 95(2):117-23. PubMed ID: 16473085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Micro push-out bond strengths of four fiber-reinforced composite post systems and 2 luting materials.
Kececi AD; Ureyen Kaya B; Adanir N
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Jan; 105(1):121-8. PubMed ID: 17942331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Effect of different bonding conditions on the shear bond strength of two compomers to bovine dentin.
Al-Nahedh H; Ateyah NZ
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 Sep; 7(4):9-16. PubMed ID: 16957786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison of in-vitro bond strengths between resin-modified glass ionomer, polyacid-modified composite resin, and giomer adhesive systems.
Chitnis D; Dunn WJ; Gonzales DA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Mar; 129(3):330.e11-6. PubMed ID: 16527626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Pulpal response to a newly developed MMA based resin cement for bonding tooth-colored indirect restorations.
Seki Y; Shimada Y; Foxton RM; Tagami J
Am J Dent; 2006 Oct; 19(5):297-302. PubMed ID: 17076029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Evaluation of the fracture resistance of reattached incisal fragments using different materials and techniques.
Chazine M; Sedda M; Ounsi HF; Paragliola R; Ferrari M; Grandini S
Dent Traumatol; 2011 Feb; 27(1):15-8. PubMed ID: 21244624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Effect of adhesive systems associated with resin-modified glass ionomer cements.
Wang L; Sakai VT; Kawai ES; Buzalaf MA; Atta MT
J Oral Rehabil; 2006 Feb; 33(2):110-6. PubMed ID: 16457670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Fracture frequency of all-ceramic crowns during dynamic loading in a chewing simulator using different loading and luting protocols.
Heintze SD; Cavalleri A; Zellweger G; Büchler A; Zappini G
Dent Mater; 2008 Oct; 24(10):1352-61. PubMed ID: 18433859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Compressive strength recovery by composite onlays in primary teeth. Substrate treatment and luting agent effects.
Borges AF; Correr GM; Sinhoreti MA; Consani S; Sobrinho LC; Rontani RM
J Dent; 2006 Aug; 34(7):478-84. PubMed ID: 16427182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Shear bond strength of resin modified glass ionomer cement bonded to different tooth-colored restorative materials.
Taher NM; Ateyah NZ
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Feb; 8(2):25-34. PubMed ID: 17277824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Direct restoration of severely damaged incisors using short fiber-reinforced composite resin.
Garoushi S; Vallittu PK; Lassila LV
J Dent; 2007 Sep; 35(9):731-6. PubMed ID: 17614187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Effectiveness of a self-adhesive resin luting system on fracture resistance of teeth restored with dentin-bonded crowns.
Burke FJ; Fleming GJ; Abbas G; Richter B
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2006 Dec; 14(4):185-8. PubMed ID: 17205955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Incisal edge reattachment: the effect of preparation utilization and design.
Worthington RB; Murchison DF; Vandewalle KS
Quintessence Int; 1999 Sep; 30(9):637-43. PubMed ID: 10765871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. In vitro resistance to fracture of porcelain inlays bonded to tooth.
Dietschi D; Maeder M; Meyer JM; Holz J
Quintessence Int; 1990 Oct; 21(10):823-31. PubMed ID: 2082415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. One-year clinical evaluation of two resin composites, two polymerization methods, and a resin-modified glass ionomer in non-carious cervical lesions.
Koubi S; Raskin A; Bukiet F; Pignoly C; Toca E; Tassery H
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 Nov; 7(5):42-53. PubMed ID: 17091139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Differential bonds degradation of two resin-modified glass-ionomer cements in primary and permanent teeth.
Marquezan M; Fagundes TC; Toledano M; Navarro MF; Osorio R
J Dent; 2009 Nov; 37(11):857-64. PubMed ID: 19631441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Influence of post-etching cleaning and connecting porcelain on the microtensile bond strength of composite resin to feldspathic porcelain.
Magne P; Cascione D
J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Nov; 96(5):354-61. PubMed ID: 17098499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Selection of luting agents, part 1.
Jivraj SA; Kim TH; Donovan TE
J Calif Dent Assoc; 2006 Feb; 34(2):149-60. PubMed ID: 16724470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
