These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15266892)

  • 1. On chiropractic.
    Sataline L
    Conn Med; 2004; 68(6):409. PubMed ID: 15266892
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Peer review: challenging the gold standard.
    Smith ER
    Can J Cardiol; 2003 Mar; 19(3):315-6. PubMed ID: 12677291
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Criteria for the strictness of scientific publications].
    Shepoval'nikov AN; Tsitseroshin MN
    Fiziol Cheloveka; 1994; 20(5):99-114. PubMed ID: 7843556
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact factors revisited.
    Eriksson E
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2006 May; 14(5):403. PubMed ID: 16575615
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Scientists assail South Africa's 'vanity' publications.
    Scott C
    Nat Med; 2006 Jun; 12(6):597. PubMed ID: 16760989
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantitative influences on the presentation of qualitative articles.
    Morse JM
    Qual Health Res; 2007 Feb; 17(2):147-8. PubMed ID: 17220386
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Manual Therapy Journal 10 year anniversary.
    Moore A; Jull G
    Man Ther; 2005 May; 10(2):93-5. PubMed ID: 15922229
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Medical editing: an ethical dilemma.
    Gershen BJ
    Md Med; 2007; 8(1):6-7. PubMed ID: 17472144
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Experiences in challenging chiropractic.
    Chotkowski LA
    Conn Med; 2003 Apr; 67(4):249-50. PubMed ID: 12760084
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sensationalism in the media: when scientists and journalists may be complicit collaborators.
    Ransohoff DF; Ransohoff RM
    Eff Clin Pract; 2001; 4(4):185-8. PubMed ID: 11525108
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Editorial: Gratitude and new beginnings.
    Cowling WR
    J Holist Nurs; 2008 Mar; 26(1):5-6. PubMed ID: 18332352
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Standards for ethical publication.
    Johnson JT; Niparko JK; Levine PA; Kennedy DW; Rudy SF; Weber P; Weber RS; Benninger MS; Rosenfeld RM; Ruben RJ; Smith RJ; Sataloff RT; Weir N
    Am J Otolaryngol; 2007; 28(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 17162121
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How honest can a medical journal be?
    Groves T
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2006 Feb; 46(1):2-3. PubMed ID: 16441685
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Some reflections on peer review.
    Elwood TW
    J Allied Health; 2014; 43(1):1. PubMed ID: 24598893
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Increasing the JIF of mycoses: a challenge with several facets.
    Korting HC
    Mycoses; 2007 Sep; 50(5):331. PubMed ID: 17714355
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Keeping a critical eye on chiropractic.
    Johnson C
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2008 Oct; 31(8):559-61. PubMed ID: 18984237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Regional associations of medical journal editors: moving from rhetoric to reality.
    Habibzadeh F
    Bull World Health Organ; 2005 Jun; 83(6):404. PubMed ID: 15976887
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Worshiping false idols: the impact factor dilemma.
    Brumback RA
    J Child Neurol; 2008 Apr; 23(4):365-7. PubMed ID: 18401031
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. So, why peer review?
    Malay DS
    J Foot Ankle Surg; 2008; 47(4):265-6. PubMed ID: 18590885
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Trends and future challenges in medical editing.
    Akhtar J
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2011 Jan; 21(1):2-3. PubMed ID: 21276375
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.