These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1526701)

  • 1. Influence of visual echo and visual reverberation on speech fluency in stutterers.
    Smołka E; Adamczyk B
    Int J Rehabil Res; 1992; 15(2):134-9. PubMed ID: 1526701
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of acoustical, visual and tactile reverberation on speech fluency of stutterers.
    Kuniszyk-Jóźkowiak W; Smołka E; Adamczyk B
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 1997; 49(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 9097492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of acoustical, visual and tactile echo on speech fluency of stutterers.
    Kuniszyk-Jóźkowiak W; Smołka E; Adamczyk B
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 1996; 48(4):193-200. PubMed ID: 8823988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Control of on-time (duration of phonation) and voice onset time in right and left ear auditory feedback: different lateralization in stutterers and non-stutterers?].
    Jäncke L; Kalveram KT
    Z Exp Angew Psychol; 1987; 34(1):54-63. PubMed ID: 3577254
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of echo and reverberation on the speech process.
    Adamczyk B; Kuniszyk-Jóźkowiak W; Smołka E
    Folia Phoniatr (Basel); 1979; 31(1):70-81. PubMed ID: 478409
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Inducement of fluent speech in persons who stutter via visual choral speech.
    Kalinowski J; Stuart A; Rastatter MP; Snyder G; Dayalu V
    Neurosci Lett; 2000 Mar; 281(2-3):198-200. PubMed ID: 10704777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of echo and reverberation of a restricted information capacity on the speech process.
    Adamczyk B; Kuniszyk-Jóźkowiak W
    Folia Phoniatr (Basel); 1987; 39(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 3817674
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Psychophysical analysis of audiovisual judgments of speech naturalness of nonstutterers and stutterers.
    Schiavetti N; Martin RR; Haroldson SK; Metz DE
    J Speech Hear Res; 1994 Feb; 37(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 8170130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Difference of susceptibility to delayed auditory feedback between stutterers and nonstutterers.
    Fukawa T; Yoshioka H; Ozawa E; Yoshida S
    J Speech Hear Res; 1988 Sep; 31(3):475-9. PubMed ID: 3172765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Physiological factors related to delayed auditory feedback and stuttering: a review.
    Timmons BA
    Percept Mot Skills; 1982 Dec; 55(3 Pt 2):1179-89. PubMed ID: 7167308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Stuttering, delayed auditory feedback, and linguistic rhythm.
    Harrington J
    J Speech Hear Res; 1988 Mar; 31(1):36-47. PubMed ID: 3352254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Personal constructs of fluency: a study comparing stutterers and nonstutterers.
    Naidoo S; Pillay YG
    Psychol Rep; 1990 Apr; 66(2):375-8. PubMed ID: 2349323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Delayed auditory feedback and the speech of stuttering and non-stuttering children.
    Timmons BA; Boudreau JP
    Percept Mot Skills; 1978 Apr; 46(2):551-5. PubMed ID: 662555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Speech quality measurement and the management of stuttering.
    Onslow M; Ingham RJ
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1987 Feb; 52(1):2-17. PubMed ID: 3543496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fluent speech, fast articulatory rate, and delayed auditory feedback: creating a crisis for a scientific revolution?
    Stuart A; Kalinowski J
    Percept Mot Skills; 1996 Feb; 82(1):211-8. PubMed ID: 8668478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of speech envelopes of stutters and nonstutterers.
    Kuniszyk-Jóźkowiak W
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Aug; 100(2 Pt 1):1105-10. PubMed ID: 8759963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of alterations in auditory feedback and speech rate on stuttering frequency.
    Kalinowski J; Armson J; Roland-Mieszkowski M; Stuart A; Gracco VL
    Lang Speech; 1993; 36 ( Pt 1)():1-16. PubMed ID: 8345771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Following up on treated stutterers: studies of perceptions of fluency and job status.
    Craig AR; Calver P
    J Speech Hear Res; 1991 Apr; 34(2):279-84. PubMed ID: 2046352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Speech disfluencies and delayed auditory feedback reactions of stuttering and non-stuttering children.
    Timmons BA; Boudreau JP
    Percept Mot Skills; 1978 Dec; 47(3 Pt 1):859-62. PubMed ID: 740481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Expectancy and heart rate as predictors of the speech performance of stutterers.
    Baumgartner JM; Brutten GJ
    J Speech Hear Res; 1983 Sep; 26(3):383-8. PubMed ID: 6645463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.