271 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15267024)
1. The Stark truth. Government tries to make sense of long and complex law.
Borges W
Tex Med; 2004 Jun; 100(6):37-8. PubMed ID: 15267024
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Nuclear medicine and the Stark truth: what are the rules?
Greeson TW
J Nucl Med; 2007 Jul; 48(7):24N-28N. PubMed ID: 17607030
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Hospital-physician compensation methods under the Stark Act.
Becker S; Nino K
Health Care Law Mon; 1999 Mar; ():3-8. PubMed ID: 10351447
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The Stark Law: boon or boondoggle? An analysis of the prohibition on physician self-referrals.
Wales SD
Law Psychol Rev; 2003; 27():1-28. PubMed ID: 16514757
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The emperor has no clothes: examining the employee exception to the anti-referral laws.
Scheutzow SO
J Health Law; 2001; 34(1):21-45. PubMed ID: 11263138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Self-referral Q&A. Stark II expands federal restrictions on physician referral practices.
Barton HM
Tex Med; 1995 Feb; 91(2):24-7. PubMed ID: 7701439
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. "Stark II" and state self-referral restrictions.
Dechene JC; O'Neill KP
J Health Hosp Law; 1996; 29(2):65-87. PubMed ID: 10160176
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Is the Stark law necessary? An interview with a health law expert. Interview by Joan Naper.
Gaynor JM
Hosp Technol Ser; 1995 Oct; 14(12):3-5. PubMed ID: 10152541
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Stark Law changes are on the horizon.
Armon BD
Del Med J; 2009 Aug; 81(8):293-4. PubMed ID: 19813513
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. New final Stark II regulations.
Pontius CA
MLO Med Lab Obs; 2001 May; 33(5):14. PubMed ID: 11373811
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Changes to the federal Stark law that affect diagnostic imaging arrangements.
Stirewalt K
Minn Med; 2009 Dec; 92(12):49-51. PubMed ID: 20092174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Physician refer thyself: is Stark II, phase III the final voyage?
Manchikanti L; McMahon EB
Pain Physician; 2007 Nov; 10(6):725-41. PubMed ID: 17987094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Can it be--Pete Stark, the doctor's pal?. Interview by Michael Pretzer.
Stark P
Med Econ; 1998 Dec; 75(24):45-6, 48-9. PubMed ID: 10338829
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The Stark truth about the Stark law: Part II.
Gosfield AG
Fam Pract Manag; 2004 Feb; 11(2):41-5. PubMed ID: 15011481
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Stark II Final Rule (Phase I): some answers, more questions.
Shay AW; Murphy SL
Manag Care Q; 2002; 10(1):38-46. PubMed ID: 15988954
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The Stark Act and the fraud and abuse statute: a Congressional and general update.
Becker S
Benders Health Care Law Mon; 1996 Apr; ():3-6. PubMed ID: 10159085
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Medical practice: HCFA's proposed final rule for Stark II provisions.
Pang B
J Law Med Ethics; 2001; 29(1):106-7. PubMed ID: 11521260
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Antikickback versus stark: what's the difference?
Watnik RL
Healthc Financ Manage; 2000 Mar; 54(3):66-7. PubMed ID: 10847919
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The Stark Act--joint ventures.
Becker S
Health Care Law Mon; 1998 Sep; ():11-6. PubMed ID: 10186113
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The patient has not been informed: a proposal for a physician conflict of interest disclosure law.
Michna C
Spec Law Dig Health Care Law; 1994 May; (183):9-42. PubMed ID: 10134665
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
