These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
271 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15267024)
21. The "Stark" maze. Battaglia SK Del Med J; 2001 Oct; 73(10):387-9. PubMed ID: 11702435 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Stark revisions arrive. Docs await CMS referral changes--whatever they are. Blesch G Mod Healthc; 2007 Sep; 37(35):8-9. PubMed ID: 17960699 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Yet more changes to the stark law regulations. Reisman G; Wool HS; Chananie SJ; Finnegan JH J Am Coll Radiol; 2009 Feb; 6(2):81-4. PubMed ID: 19179234 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Stark realities for hospitals. Reynolds M Healthc Financ Manage; 2004 Sep; 58(9):50-5. PubMed ID: 15460937 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. HCFA issues. Stark II proposed rules. Portman RM; Lisa GC Bull Am Coll Surg; 1998 Jun; 83(6):20-23. PubMed ID: 10180259 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. How the new Stark II regulations affect group practices. Larios D; Meyer A Tenn Med; 1998 Apr; 91(4):128-30. PubMed ID: 9564245 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Proposed Stark II regulations unveiled. HCFA interpretation of self-referral rules recognize circumstances of dialysis providers. Riley JB; Pristave RJ Nephrol News Issues; 1998 Jun; 12(6):13-5. PubMed ID: 9697471 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Integrated healthcare systems. Stark II complicates system planning. O'Hare PK Healthc Financ Manage; 1995 Jan; 49(1):20-1. PubMed ID: 10146123 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. A review of the new Stark Phase II regulations. Siegel S Health Care Law Mon; 2004 Jun; ():3-15. PubMed ID: 15250190 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Remuneration arrangements important part of Stark II regulations. Caesar N Manag Care; 1998 Jul; 7(7):65-6. PubMed ID: 10181941 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. A physician's guide to Stark rules. Guglielmo WJ Med Econ; 2004 Jul; 81(14):23-6, 29. PubMed ID: 15357172 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Stark has softer touch in new regs. Ivers D J Ark Med Soc; 2001 Nov; 98(5):141-7. PubMed ID: 11685807 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Offering guidance. CMS clarifies exceptions to specialty hospital ban. Taylor M Mod Healthc; 2004 Mar; 34(12):4. PubMed ID: 15069892 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Centers for medicare and medicaid now scrutinizing leasing arrangements. Travis NL; Wool HS; Chananie SJ J Am Coll Radiol; 2007 Oct; 4(10):683-5. PubMed ID: 17903751 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Buyer beware: complying with amended stark and anti-kickback regulations. Klein SR; Fox SJ J Healthc Inf Manag; 2008; 22(2):8-10. PubMed ID: 19266987 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. CMS issues final Phase III Regulations--significant impact on physician-hospital and physician-driven relationships. Becker S; Lundeen R; Heinze G Health Care Law Mon; 2007 Dec; 2007(12):2-19. PubMed ID: 18277700 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. What is the cost of a free lunch? Taking time to assess hospitals' conflict-of-interest policies. Willard MJ Mater Manag Health Care; 2008 Oct; 17(10):24-8. PubMed ID: 19025169 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Medicare program; delay of the date of applicability for certain provisions of Physicians' Referrals to Health Care Entities With Which They Have Financial Relationships (Phase III). Final rule. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS Fed Regist; 2007 Nov; 72(220):64161-2. PubMed ID: 18038483 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]