These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15267125)

  • 1. Is the implicit association test immune to faking?
    Steffens MC
    Exp Psychol; 2004; 51(3):165-79. PubMed ID: 15267125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intentional faking of the single category Implicit Association Test and the Implicit Association Test.
    Stieger S; Göritz AS; Hergovich A; Voracek M
    Psychol Rep; 2011 Aug; 109(1):219-30. PubMed ID: 22049663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Exaggeration is harder than understatement, but practice makes perfect!
    Röhner J; Schröder-Abé M; Schütz A
    Exp Psychol; 2011; 58(6):464-72. PubMed ID: 21592941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of implicitly incentivized faking on explicit and implicit measures of doping attitude: when athletes want to pretend an even more negative attitude to doping.
    Wolff W; Schindler S; Brand R
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(4):e0118507. PubMed ID: 25902142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Attitude measurement using the Implicit Association Test (IAT).
    Plessner H; Banse R
    Z Exp Psychol; 2001; 48(2):82-4. PubMed ID: 11392984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Compelled to consume: the Implicit Association Test and automatic alcohol motivation.
    Ostafin BD; Palfai TP
    Psychol Addict Behav; 2006 Sep; 20(3):322-7. PubMed ID: 16938070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Minimizing the influence of recoding in the Implicit Association Test: the Recoding-Free Implicit Association Test (IAT-RF).
    Rothermund K; Teige-Mocigemba S; Gast A; Wentura D
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Jan; 62(1):84-98. PubMed ID: 18609400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Employing automatic approach and avoidance tendencies for the assessment of implicit personality self-concept: The implicit association procedure (IAP).
    Schnabel K; Banse R; Asendorpf J
    Exp Psychol; 2006; 53(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 16610274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Deliberate faking on personality and emotional intelligence measures.
    Hartman NS; Grubb WL
    Psychol Rep; 2011 Feb; 108(1):120-38. PubMed ID: 21526598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Using the implicit association test to measure self-esteem and self-concept.
    Greenwald AG; Farnham SD
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2000 Dec; 79(6):1022-38. PubMed ID: 11138752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Items' cross-category associations as a confounding factor in the Implicit Association Test.
    Steffens MC; Plewe I
    Z Exp Psychol; 2001; 48(2):123-34. PubMed ID: 11392980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Implicit attitudes towards homosexuality: reliability, validity, and controllability of the IAT.
    Banse R; Seise J; Zerbes N
    Z Exp Psychol; 2001; 48(2):145-60. PubMed ID: 11392982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Trying to separate the wheat from the chaff: Construct- and faking-related variance on the Implicit Association Test (IAT).
    Röhner J; Ewers T
    Behav Res Methods; 2016 Mar; 48(1):243-58. PubMed ID: 25701107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Implicit association measurement with the IAT: evidence for effects of executive control processes.
    Mierke J; Klauer KC
    Z Exp Psychol; 2001; 48(2):107-22. PubMed ID: 11392979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Uninstructed BIAT faking when ego depleted or in normal state: differential effect on brain and behavior.
    Wolff W; Schindler S; Englert C; Brand R; Kissler J
    BMC Neurosci; 2016 May; 17(1):18. PubMed ID: 27142046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Testing the semantic differential as a model of task processes with the implicit association test.
    Xiong MJ; Logan GD; Franks JJ
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Oct; 34(7):1452-63. PubMed ID: 17263070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Variance in faking across noncognitive measures.
    McFarland LA; Ryan AM
    J Appl Psychol; 2000 Oct; 85(5):812-21. PubMed ID: 11055152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A unified theory of implicit attitudes, stereotypes, self-esteem, and self-concept.
    Greenwald AG; Banaji MR; Rudman LA; Farnham SD; Nosek BA; Mellott DS
    Psychol Rev; 2002 Jan; 109(1):3-25. PubMed ID: 11863040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Implicit Association Test: A Method in Search of a Construct.
    Schimmack U
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2021 Mar; 16(2):396-414. PubMed ID: 31647752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cerebral correlates of faking: evidence from a brief implicit association test on doping attitudes.
    Schindler S; Wolff W; Kissler JM; Brand R
    Front Behav Neurosci; 2015; 9():139. PubMed ID: 26074798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.