These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15267127)

  • 1. Lost in thought: cognitive load and the processing of addressees' feedback in verbal communication.
    Rossnagel CS
    Exp Psychol; 2004; 51(3):191-200. PubMed ID: 15267127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Perspective-Taking in Referential Communication: Does Stimulated Attention to Addressees' Perspective Influence Speakers' Reference Production?
    Damen D; van der Wijst P; van Amelsvoort M; Krahmer E
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2019 Apr; 48(2):257-288. PubMed ID: 30219958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prosodic disambiguation of syntactic structure: for the speaker or for the addressee?
    Kraljic T; Brennan SE
    Cogn Psychol; 2005 Mar; 50(2):194-231. PubMed ID: 15680144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Do speakers avoid ambiguities during dialogue?
    Haywood SL; Pickering MJ; Branigan HP
    Psychol Sci; 2005 May; 16(5):362-6. PubMed ID: 15869694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Speakers' overestimation of their effectiveness.
    Keysar B; Henly AS
    Psychol Sci; 2002 May; 13(3):207-12. PubMed ID: 12009039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How Cognitive Load Influences Speakers' Choice of Referring Expressions.
    Vogels J; Krahmer E; Maes A
    Cogn Sci; 2015 Aug; 39(6):1396-418. PubMed ID: 25471259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Addressees' needs influence speakers' early syntactic choices.
    Lockridge CB; Brennan SE
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2002 Sep; 9(3):550-7. PubMed ID: 12412896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The impact of shared knowledge on speakers' prosody.
    Michelas A; Cau C; Champagne-Lavau M
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(10):e0223640. PubMed ID: 31609982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Audience design affects acoustic reduction via production facilitation.
    Arnold JE; Kahn JM; Pancani GC
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2012 Jun; 19(3):505-12. PubMed ID: 22419403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Temporal organization of "internal speech" as a basis for cerebellar modulation of cognitive functions.
    Ackermann H; Mathiak K; Ivry RB
    Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev; 2004 Mar; 3(1):14-22. PubMed ID: 15191639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Attention to Speech-Accompanying Gestures: Eye Movements and Information Uptake.
    Gullberg M; Kita S
    J Nonverbal Behav; 2009 Dec; 33(4):251-277. PubMed ID: 19862347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Syntactic alignment and participant role in dialogue.
    Branigan HP; Pickering MJ; McLean JF; Cleland AA
    Cognition; 2007 Aug; 104(2):163-97. PubMed ID: 16876778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Do addressees adopt the perspective of the speaker?
    Pickering MJ; McLean JF; Gambi C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 Oct; 141(2):261-9. PubMed ID: 22727911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dyadic communication, verbal behavior, thinking, and understanding. I. Background problems and theory.
    McGuire MT
    J Nerv Ment Dis; 1971 Apr; 152(4):223-41. PubMed ID: 5581390
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A job interview in the MRI scanner: How does indirectness affect addressees and overhearers?
    Bašnáková J; van Berkum J; Weber K; Hagoort P
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Sep; 76():79-91. PubMed ID: 25858603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interjections in interviews.
    O'Connell DC; Kowal S; Ageneau C
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2005 Mar; 34(2):153-71. PubMed ID: 15991877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. You said it before and you'll say it again: expectations of consistency in communication.
    Shintel H; Keysar B
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Mar; 33(2):357-69. PubMed ID: 17352617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Disinhibition of communicated thought: generality and role of cognitive style.
    Holzman PS; Rousey C
    J Abnorm Psychol; 1971 Jun; 77(3):263-74. PubMed ID: 5556935
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Developing interpretation bias modification as a "cognitive vaccine" for depressed mood: imagining positive events makes you feel better than thinking about them verbally.
    Holmes EA; Lang TJ; Shah DM
    J Abnorm Psychol; 2009 Feb; 118(1):76-88. PubMed ID: 19222316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Producing pronouns and definite noun phrases: do speakers use the addressee's discourse model?
    Fukumura K; van Gompel RP
    Cogn Sci; 2012; 36(7):1289-311. PubMed ID: 22671693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.