109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1526745)
1. Properties of staircase procedures for estimating thresholds in automated perimetry.
Johnson CA; Chauhan BC; Shapiro LR
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1992 Sep; 33(10):2966-74. PubMed ID: 1526745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Combining perimetric suprathreshold and threshold procedures to reduce measurement variability in areas of visual field loss.
McKendrick AM; Turpin A
Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Jan; 82(1):43-51. PubMed ID: 15630403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Simulations for FASTPAC and the standard 4-2 dB full-threshold strategy of the Humphrey Field Analyzer.
Glass E; Schaumberger M; Lachenmayr BJ
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1995 Aug; 36(9):1847-54. PubMed ID: 7635658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Estimating thresholds in conventional and high-pass resolution perimetry using computer simulation.
Chauhan BC; House PH
J Glaucoma; 1994; 3(2):132-9. PubMed ID: 19920566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Development of efficient threshold strategies for frequency doubling technology perimetry using computer simulation.
Turpin A; McKendrick AM; Johnson CA; Vingrys AJ
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Feb; 43(2):322-31. PubMed ID: 11818373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Advantages of terminating Zippy Estimation by Sequential Testing (ZEST) with dynamic criteria for white-on-white perimetry.
McKendrick AM; Turpin A
Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Nov; 82(11):981-7. PubMed ID: 16317375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Short-term fluctuation as an estimate of variability in visual field data.
Casson EJ; Shapiro LR; Johnson CA
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1990 Nov; 31(11):2459-63. PubMed ID: 2243009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Performance of efficient test procedures for frequency-doubling technology perimetry in normal and glaucomatous eyes.
Turpin A; McKendrick AM; Johnson CA; Vingrys AJ
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Mar; 43(3):709-15. PubMed ID: 11867588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Retesting visual fields: utilizing prior information to decrease test-retest variability in glaucoma.
Turpin A; Jankovic D; McKendrick AM
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Apr; 48(4):1627-34. PubMed ID: 17389493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Modeling the sensitivity to variability relationship in perimetry.
Gardiner SK; Demirel S; Johnson CA
Vision Res; 2006 May; 46(11):1732-45. PubMed ID: 16412491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The properties of perimetric thresholds in normal and glaucomatous eyes.
Weber J; Rau S
Ger J Ophthalmol; 1992; 1(2):79-85. PubMed ID: 1477630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Measurement error of visual field tests in glaucoma.
Spry PG; Johnson CA; McKendrick AM; Turpin A
Br J Ophthalmol; 2003 Jan; 87(1):107-12. PubMed ID: 12488273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Repeatability of automated perimetry: a comparison between standard automated perimetry with stimulus size III and V, matrix, and motion perimetry.
Wall M; Woodward KR; Doyle CK; Artes PH
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Feb; 50(2):974-9. PubMed ID: 18952921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Feasibility and outcome of automated static perimetry in children using continuous light increment perimetry (CLIP) and fast threshold strategy.
Wabbels BK; Wilscher S
Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2005 Dec; 83(6):664-9. PubMed ID: 16396642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical alternative for reducing the time needed to perform automated threshold perimetry.
Fingeret M
J Am Optom Assoc; 1995 Nov; 66(11):699-705. PubMed ID: 8576535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Variability of sensitivity thresholds in short-wavelength automated perimetry (SWAP) in the central vision field].
Polo Llorens V; Larrosa Poves JM; Pinilla Lozano I; Pablo Júlvez L; Rojo Aragües A; Cuevas Andrés R; Ruiz Moreno O; Honrubia López FM
Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol; 2000 Feb; 75(2):85-90. PubMed ID: 11151125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fundus perimetry with the Micro Perimeter 1 in normal individuals: comparison with conventional threshold perimetry.
Springer C; Bültmann S; Völcker HE; Rohrschneider K
Ophthalmology; 2005 May; 112(5):848-54. PubMed ID: 15878065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Adaptation mechanisms, eccentricity profiles, and clinical implementation of red-on-white perimetry.
Zele AJ; Dang TM; O'Loughlin RK; Guymer RH; Harper A; Vingrys AJ
Optom Vis Sci; 2008 May; 85(5):309-17. PubMed ID: 18451735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Threshold and variability properties of matrix frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in glaucoma.
Artes PH; Hutchison DM; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP; Chauhan BC
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jul; 46(7):2451-7. PubMed ID: 15980235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Properties of perimetric threshold estimates from full threshold, ZEST, and SITA-like strategies, as determined by computer simulation.
Turpin A; McKendrick AM; Johnson CA; Vingrys AJ
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2003 Nov; 44(11):4787-95. PubMed ID: 14578400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
