53 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1526839)
21. Minimally invasive diagnosis and surgery in breast screening.
Kerin MJ; Gorey TF
Ir J Med Sci; 1998; 167(2):70-1. PubMed ID: 9638016
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Confusion over mammography screening intensifies.
Lancet Oncol; 2002 Mar; 3(3):127. PubMed ID: 11902495
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. ABC of breast diseases. Screening for breast cancer.
Blamey RW; Wilson AR; Patnick J; Dixon JM
BMJ; 1994 Oct; 309(6961):1076-9. PubMed ID: 7950747
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. [The limits of screening for breast cancer have some advantages].
Espié M
Presse Med; 2003 Jan; 32(3):119. PubMed ID: 12610383
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. The first three years of the Guildford Breast Screening Project.
Thomas BA; Price JL; Boulter PS; Gibbs NM
Recent Results Cancer Res; 1984; 90():195-9. PubMed ID: 6701376
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. The impact of core-biopsy on pre-operative diagnosis rate of screen-detected breast cancers.
Muir BB; Kirkpatrick AE; Anderson TJ; Lamb J; Walsh JS; Chetty U; Dixon JM; Anderson EC; Cunningham M
Clin Radiol; 1997 Jul; 52(7):566-7. PubMed ID: 9240717
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Invited commentary: The breast density dilemma--challenges, lessons, and future directions.
Butler RS
Radiographics; 2015; 35(2):324-6. PubMed ID: 25763720
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Correspondence (letter to the editor): imaging is not sufficient.
Kaufmann M
Dtsch Arztebl Int; 2009 Feb; 106(9):145; author reply 146-7. PubMed ID: 19568382
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Implications on laboratory workload of breast cancer screening.
Green B; McDicken IW; Turnbull LS
J Clin Pathol; 1992 Jun; 45(6):521-3. PubMed ID: 1624600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Future prospects of population-based mammographic screening.
Holmberg L
Semin Surg Oncol; 1996; 12(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 8821406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Diseases of the female breast: screening, mammography, ultrasound].
Otto RC
Ther Umsch; 1993 May; 50(5):323-33. PubMed ID: 8378888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [The value of the localization technique of occult breast changes with reference to future screening programs].
Hess T; Benz J; Juchler A
Helv Chir Acta; 1992 May; 59(1):263-8. PubMed ID: 1526839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Results of mammographic localization of occult breast cancer at a teaching community hospital.
Greene FL; Martin P; Rotz T
J S C Med Assoc; 1990 Mar; 86(3):155-7. PubMed ID: 2325372
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Impact of mammographic screening on the size and the relative frequency of invasion in breast cancers seen in a community hospital from 1975-1988.
Bennington JL; Lagios MD; Margolin FR
Pathology (Phila); 1992; 1(1):11-21. PubMed ID: 9420912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A decade of breast cancer screening in The Netherlands: trends in the preoperative diagnosis of breast cancer.
Duijm LE; Groenewoud JH; Roumen RM; de Koning HJ; Plaisier ML; Fracheboud J
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Nov; 106(1):113-9. PubMed ID: 17219049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Intraoperative localization of occult breast tumours.
Mahoney L
Can J Surg; 1985 Jul; 28(4):329-30. PubMed ID: 4016606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
