168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15268830)
1. [Phacoemulsification using burst mode].
Liu YZ; Cheng B
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2004 Apr; 40(4):239-42. PubMed ID: 15268830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [A clinical report on the use of burst mode phacoemulsification].
Yang J; Lu Y
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2005 Jan; 41(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 15774110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of hydrodynamic parameters on corneal endothelial cell loss after phacoemulsification.
Baradaran-Rafii A; Rahmati-Kamel M; Eslani M; Kiavash V; Karimian F
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Apr; 35(4):732-7. PubMed ID: 19304097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Endothelial cell damage after cataract surgery: divide-and-conquer versus phaco-chop technique.
Storr-Paulsen A; Norregaard JC; Ahmed S; Storr-Paulsen T; Pedersen TH
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Jun; 34(6):996-1000. PubMed ID: 18499008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of early corneal endothelial cell loss after coaxial phacoemulsification through 1.8 mm microincision and bimanual phacoemulsification through 1.7 mm microincision.
Wilczynski M; Supady E; Loba P; Synder A; Palenga-Pydyn D; Omulecki W
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Sep; 35(9):1570-4. PubMed ID: 19683154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Phacoemulsification with nondominant hand.
Sharma V; Sinha R; Sharma N; Dada T; Tandon R; Titiyal JS; Vajpayee RB
Eye (Lond); 2007 Aug; 21(8):1037-40. PubMed ID: 16691257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Ultrasound energy and endothelial cell loss with stop-and-chop and nuclear preslice phacoemulsification.
Pereira AC; Porfírio F; Freitas LL; Belfort R
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 Oct; 32(10):1661-6. PubMed ID: 17010864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Corneal endothelial cell loss during phacoemulsification: bevel-up versus bevel-down phaco tip.
Faramarzi A; Javadi MA; Karimian F; Jafarinasab MR; Baradaran-Rafii A; Jafari F; Yaseri M
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2011 Nov; 37(11):1971-6. PubMed ID: 21940143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of Nagahara phaco-chop and stop-and-chop phacoemulsification nucleotomy techniques.
Can I; Takmaz T; Cakici F; Ozgül M
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Mar; 30(3):663-8. PubMed ID: 15050265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Phacoemulsification parameters: series 20000 Legacy Versus Legacy with AdvanTec software and NeoSoniX handpiece.
Jirásková N; Rozsíval P
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Jan; 30(1):144-8. PubMed ID: 14967282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Comparison of efficacy and safety of cataract phacoemulsification in patients with different degree of nuclear sclerosis].
Laudańska-Olszewska I; Synder A; Wesołek-Czernik A; Omulecki W
Klin Oczna; 2008; 110(4-6):172-5. PubMed ID: 18655456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Intraindividual comparison of surgical trauma after bimanual microincision and conventional small-incision coaxial phacoemulsification.
Kahraman G; Amon M; Franz C; Prinz A; Abela-Formanek C
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Apr; 33(4):618-22. PubMed ID: 17397733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Torsional ultrasound efficiency under different vacuum levels in different degrees of nuclear cataract.
Wang Y; Xia Y; Zeng M; Liu X; Luo L; Chen B; Liu Y; Liu Y
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Nov; 35(11):1941-5. PubMed ID: 19878827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of bimanual and micro-coaxial phacoemulsification with torsional ultrasound.
Wang Y; Xia Y; Liu X; Zheng D; Luo L; Liu Y
Acta Ophthalmol; 2012 Mar; 90(2):184-7. PubMed ID: 20163365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Determining factors for corneal endothelial cell loss by using bimanual microincision phacoemulsification and power modulation.
Mathys KC; Cohen KL; Armstrong BD
Cornea; 2007 Oct; 26(9):1049-55. PubMed ID: 17893532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of conventional phacoemulsification technique vs. cool phacoemulsification technique with the importance of phacoemulsification variables.
Wahab S; Faiz-ur-Rub K; Hargun LD
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2010 Jul; 20(7):449-53. PubMed ID: 20642944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative clinical trial of ultrasound phacoemulsification with and without the WhiteStar system.
Fishkind W; Bakewell B; Donnenfeld ED; Rose AD; Watkins LA; Olson RJ
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 Jan; 32(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 16516777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Half-moon supracapsular nucleofractis phacoemulsification: safety, efficacy, and functionality.
Can I; Takmaz T; Genç I
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Nov; 34(11):1958-65. PubMed ID: 19006745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Torsional mode versus conventional ultrasound mode phacoemulsification: randomized comparative clinical study.
Liu Y; Zeng M; Liu X; Luo L; Yuan Z; Xia Y; Zeng Y
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Feb; 33(2):287-92. PubMed ID: 17276271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative study of coaxial phacoemulsification and microincision cataract surgery. One-year follow-up.
Crema AS; Walsh A; Yamane Y; Nosé W
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Jun; 33(6):1014-8. PubMed ID: 17531696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
