BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15269957)

  • 1. Sensitivity of femoral orientation estimates to condylar surface and MR image plane location.
    Shibanuma N; Sheehan FT; Lipsky PE; Stanhope SJ
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Aug; 20(2):300-5. PubMed ID: 15269957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A new in vivo technique for determination of 3D kinematics and contact areas of the patello-femoral and tibio-femoral joint.
    von Eisenhart-Rothe R; Siebert M; Bringmann C; Vogl T; Englmeier KH; Graichen H
    J Biomech; 2004 Jun; 37(6):927-34. PubMed ID: 15111080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The accuracy of posterior condylar angles measured by one MR image.
    Tan CM; Liau JJ; Chen WT; Cheng CK
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2007 Mar; 456():159-63. PubMed ID: 17106272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of patellofemoral relationships using kinematic MRI: comparison between qualitative and quantitative methods.
    Ward SR; Shellock FG; Terk MR; Salsich GB; Powers CM
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2002 Jul; 16(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 12112505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Weight-bearing MRI of patellofemoral joint cartilage contact area.
    Gold GE; Besier TF; Draper CE; Asakawa DS; Delp SL; Beaupre GS
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Sep; 20(3):526-30. PubMed ID: 15332263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In vivo assessment of patellofemoral joint contact area in individuals who are pain free.
    Salsich GB; Ward SR; Terk MR; Powers CM
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2003 Dec; (417):277-84. PubMed ID: 14646727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The coupled motion of the femur and patella during in vivo weightbearing knee flexion.
    Li G; Papannagari R; Nha KW; Defrate LE; Gill TJ; Rubash HE
    J Biomech Eng; 2007 Dec; 129(6):937-43. PubMed ID: 18067400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Patellar tracking and patellofemoral geometry in deep knee flexion.
    Moro-oka T; Matsuda S; Miura H; Nagamine R; Urabe K; Kawano T; Higaki H; Iwamoto Y
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2002 Jan; (394):161-8. PubMed ID: 11795728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Oblique MR imaging of the anterior cruciate ligament based on three-dimensional orientation.
    Breitenseher MJ; Mayerhoefer ME
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Sep; 26(3):794-8. PubMed ID: 17729337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Q-angle undervalued? The relationship between Q-angle and medio-lateral position of the patella.
    Herrington L; Nester C
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2004 Dec; 19(10):1070-3. PubMed ID: 15531059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of patello-femoral alignment using MRI.
    Kobayashi T; Fujikawa K; Nemoto K; Yamazaki M; Obara M; Sato S
    Knee; 2005 Dec; 12(6):447-53. PubMed ID: 15967667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Femur shape prediction by multiple regression based on quadric surface fitting.
    Sholukha V; Chapman T; Salvia P; Moiseev F; Euran F; Rooze M; Van Sint Jan S
    J Biomech; 2011 Feb; 44(4):712-8. PubMed ID: 21122862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Relative positions of the contacts on the cartilage surfaces of the knee joint.
    Walker PS; Yildirim G; Sussman-Fort J; Klein GR
    Knee; 2006 Oct; 13(5):382-8. PubMed ID: 16790353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Patellofemoral joint: evaluation during active flexion with ultrafast spoiled GRASS MR imaging.
    Shellock FG; Foo TK; Deutsch AL; Mink JH
    Radiology; 1991 Aug; 180(2):581-5. PubMed ID: 2068335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [MRI of the lateral ankle ligaments: value of three-dimensional orientation].
    Mayerhöfer ME; Breitenseher MJ
    Rofo; 2003 May; 175(5):670-5. PubMed ID: 12743861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Normative three-dimensional patellofemoral and tibiofemoral kinematics: a dynamic, in vivo study.
    Seisler AR; Sheehan FT
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 Jul; 54(7):1333-41. PubMed ID: 17605365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Kinematic MR imaging of the patellofemoral joint: comparison of passive positioning and active movement techniques.
    Shellock FG; Mink JH; Deutsch AL; Foo TK
    Radiology; 1992 Aug; 184(2):574-7. PubMed ID: 1620868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Tibio-femoral movement in the living knee. A study of weight bearing and non-weight bearing knee kinematics using 'interventional' MRI.
    Johal P; Williams A; Wragg P; Hunt D; Gedroyc W
    J Biomech; 2005 Feb; 38(2):269-76. PubMed ID: 15598453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Spatial orientation of the facies patellaris femoris].
    Hassenpflug J; Hiss E; Blauth W
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1987; 125(3):332-6. PubMed ID: 3673185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Magnetic resonance imaging of in vivo kinematics after total knee arthroplasty.
    Lee KY; Slavinsky JP; Ries MD; Blumenkrantz G; Majumdar S
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Feb; 21(2):172-8. PubMed ID: 15666404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.