These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15270454)

  • 1. Establishing the most appropriate databases for addressing source level propositions.
    Champod C; Evett IW; Jackson G
    Sci Justice; 2004; 44(3):153-64. PubMed ID: 15270454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. More on the hierarchy of propositions: exploring the distinction between explanations and propositions.
    Evett IW; Jackson G; Lambert JA
    Sci Justice; 2000; 40(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 10795422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Databases, quality control and interpretation of DNA profiling in the Home office Forensic Science Service.
    Gill P; Evett IW; Woodroffe S; Lygo JE; Millican E; Webster M
    Electrophoresis; 1991; 12(2-3):204-9. PubMed ID: 2040267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Two items of evidence, no putative source: an inference problem in forensic intelligence.
    Taroni F; Bozza S; Biedermann A
    J Forensic Sci; 2006 Nov; 51(6):1350-61. PubMed ID: 17199621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Decision analysis in forensic science.
    Taroni F; Bozza S; Aitken C
    J Forensic Sci; 2005 Jul; 50(4):894-905. PubMed ID: 16078494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. DNA commission of the International society for forensic genetics: Assessing the value of forensic biological evidence - Guidelines highlighting the importance of propositions. Part II: Evaluation of biological traces considering activity level propositions.
    Gill P; Hicks T; Butler JM; Connolly E; Gusmão L; Kokshoorn B; Morling N; van Oorschot RAH; Parson W; Prinz M; Schneider PM; Sijen T; Taylor D
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Jan; 44():102186. PubMed ID: 31677444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Concepts and possibilities in forensic intelligence.
    Bell C
    Forensic Sci Int; 2006 Oct; 162(1-3):38-43. PubMed ID: 16893621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Nature and place of crime scene management within forensic sciences.
    Crispino F
    Sci Justice; 2008 Mar; 48(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 18450214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Which articles and which topics in the forensic sciences are most highly cited?
    Jones AW
    Sci Justice; 2005; 45(4):175-82. PubMed ID: 16686268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How do forensic scientists learn to become competent in casework reporting in practice: a theoretical and empirical approach.
    Doak S; Assimakopoulos D
    Forensic Sci Int; 2007 Apr; 167(2-3):201-6. PubMed ID: 16884877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Logical Framework for Forensic DNA Interpretation.
    Hicks T; Buckleton J; Castella V; Evett I; Jackson G
    Genes (Basel); 2022 May; 13(6):. PubMed ID: 35741719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Case work guidelines and interpretation of short tandem repeat complex mixture analysis.
    Tomsey CS; Kurtz M; Flowers B; Fumea J; Giles B; Kucherer S
    Croat Med J; 2001 Jun; 42(3):276-80. PubMed ID: 11387638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluating forensic biology results given source level propositions.
    Taylor D; Abarno D; Hicks T; Champod C
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Mar; 21():54-67. PubMed ID: 26720813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Implementing statistical learning methods through Bayesian networks. Part 1: a guide to Bayesian parameter estimation using forensic science data.
    Biedermann A; Taroni F; Bozza S
    Forensic Sci Int; 2009 Dec; 193(1-3):63-71. PubMed ID: 19833464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Neuromorphic hardware databases for exploring structure-function relationships in the brain.
    Breslin C; O'Lenskie A
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2001 Aug; 356(1412):1249-58. PubMed ID: 11545701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Bayesian approach for interpreting shoemark evidence in forensic casework: accounting for wear features.
    Skerrett J; Neumann C; Mateos-Garcia I
    Forensic Sci Int; 2011 Jul; 210(1-3):26-30. PubMed ID: 21377817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The impact of the principles of evidence interpretation on the structure and content of statements.
    Evett IW; Jackson G; Lambert JA; McCrossan S
    Sci Justice; 2000; 40(4):233-9. PubMed ID: 11094820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Selection effects and database screening in forensic science.
    Sjerps M; Meester R
    Forensic Sci Int; 2009 Nov; 192(1-3):56-61. PubMed ID: 19747786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Equal prior probabilities: can one do any better?
    Biedermann A; Taroni F; Garbolino P
    Forensic Sci Int; 2007 Oct; 172(2-3):85-93. PubMed ID: 17267153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mixture interpretation: defining the relevant features for guidelines for the assessment of mixed DNA profiles in forensic casework.
    Budowle B; Onorato AJ; Callaghan TF; Della Manna A; Gross AM; Guerrieri RA; Luttman JC; McClure DL
    J Forensic Sci; 2009 Jul; 54(4):810-21. PubMed ID: 19368620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.