BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 152709)

  • 1. Clinicians, the Mount Sinai program and the Veterans' Administration program evaluated against clinico-pathological data derived independently of the electrocardiogram.
    Bourdillon PJ; Kilpatrick D
    Eur J Cardiol; 1978 Nov; 8(4-5):395-412. PubMed ID: 152709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The program of the cooperative study of the Veterans Administration.
    Cornfield J; Pipberger HV; Dunn RA
    G Ital Cardiol; 1975; 5(2):256-61. PubMed ID: 126890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [ECG evaluation by the computer using the USPHS program (author's transl)].
    So CS
    MMW Munch Med Wochenschr; 1975 Aug; 117(34):1339-44. PubMed ID: 126374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Diagnostic accuracy of clinicians, the VA program and the Mount Sinai program in the interpretation of electrocardiograms as compared with clinicopathological data.
    Bourdillon PJ; Kilpatrick D
    Adv Cardiol; 1978; 21():165-7. PubMed ID: 145788
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Comparison of 3 ECG computer programs with interpretation by physicians].
    Saner H; Lindeland A; Scallen R; Paule W; Lange HW; Gobel FL
    Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1987 Jul; 117(27-28):1035-9. PubMed ID: 3303319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The diagnostic performance of computer programs for the interpretation of electrocardiograms.
    Willems JL; Abreu-Lima C; Arnaud P; van Bemmel JH; Brohet C; Degani R; Denis B; Gehring J; Graham I; van Herpen G
    N Engl J Med; 1991 Dec; 325(25):1767-73. PubMed ID: 1834940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Computer-based interpretation of ECG--guiding or misleading?].
    Morisbak B; Gjesdal K
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1999 Sep; 119(23):3441-4. PubMed ID: 10553343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Fully automatic computer-analysis of electrocardiograms in clinical routine (author's transl)].
    Mengden HJ; Just H; Kaspar W; Löllgen H; Kersting F
    Z Kardiol; 1978 Oct; 67(10):707-16. PubMed ID: 366940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of electrocardiogram interpretation by cardiologists in the setting of incorrect computer analysis.
    Anh D; Krishnan S; Bogun F
    J Electrocardiol; 2006 Jul; 39(3):343-5. PubMed ID: 16777525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Errors in the computerized electrocardiogram interpretation of cardiac rhythm.
    Shah AP; Rubin SA
    J Electrocardiol; 2007; 40(5):385-90. PubMed ID: 17531257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reproducibility of diagnostic results by a multivariate computer ECG analysis program (AVA 3.5).
    Willems JL; Pardaens J
    Eur J Cardiol; 1977; 6(3):229-43. PubMed ID: 338306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Use of computers in clinical electrocardiography: an evaluation.
    Wolf HK; Gregor RD; Chandler BM
    Can Med Assoc J; 1977 Oct; 117(8):877-80. PubMed ID: 334353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Computer-assisted ECG evaluation in polyclinic patients].
    Koenig W; Witzleb EJ; Khatibnia U
    Fortschr Med; 1981 Jun; 99(24):934-6. PubMed ID: 7021376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Where do derived precordial leads fail?
    Gregg RE; Zhou SH; Lindauer JM; Feild DQ; Helfenbein ED
    J Electrocardiol; 2008; 41(6):546-52. PubMed ID: 18817921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The whole is greater than the sum of its parts: the anatomy of the Department of Veterans Affairs Medical District 17 Health Services Research and Development Field Program.
    Demakis JG; Turpin RS; Conrad KJ; Stiers WM; Weaver FM; Sinacore JM; Cowper DC; Darcy LA; Huck MN; Friedman BS
    Health Serv Res; 1990 Apr; 25(1 Pt 2):269-85. PubMed ID: 2184151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The impact of an ECG computer analysis program on the cardiologist's interpretation. A cooperative study.
    Milliken JA; Pipberger H; Pipberger HV; Araoye MA; Ari R; Burggraf GW; Fletcher RD; Katz RJ; Lopez EA; McCans JL; Silver AM
    J Electrocardiol; 1983 Apr; 16(2):141-9. PubMed ID: 6222129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Employment of intra-individual variability to improve computerized ECG interpretation.
    Schijvenaars BJ; Kors JA; van Herpen G; van Bemmel JH
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2001; 84(Pt 1):513-7. PubMed ID: 11604793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Computerized serial comparison of electrocardiograms: program performance in myocardial infarction.
    Ariet M; Zhou S; DeLuca DC; Greenfield JC
    J Electrocardiol; 2007 Apr; 40(2):147-54. PubMed ID: 17118395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of a computer programme for interpretation of 12-lead electrocardiograms.
    Landelius J; Nordgren L
    Ups J Med Sci; 1979; 84(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 155918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Beat-to-beat variations of the electrocardiogram in survivors of sudden death without structural heart disease.
    Burri H; Chevalier P; Fayn J; Forlini MC; Rubel P; Touboul P
    J Electrocardiol; 2006 Jul; 39(3):310-4. PubMed ID: 16777518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.