These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 152709)

  • 21. [The Caceres-USPHS (version HP-3) computer program. Evaluation of automatic analysis of 40,000 ECG (author's transl)].
    Feruglio GA; Feraco E; Maisano G
    G Ital Cardiol; 1975; 5(2):262-71. PubMed ID: 1102374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Clinical evaluation of automated processing of electrocardiograms by the Veterans Administration program (AVA 3.4).
    Brohet CR; Richman HG
    Am J Cardiol; 1979 Jun; 43(6):1167-74. PubMed ID: 155985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Prediction of atrial fibrillation in patients with cardiac dysfunctions: P wave signal-averaged ECG and chemoreflexsensitivity in atrial fibrillation.
    Budeus M; Hennersdorf M; Felix O; Reimert K; Perings C; Wieneke H; Erbel R; Sack S
    Europace; 2007 Aug; 9(8):601-7. PubMed ID: 17507361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Common errors in computer electrocardiogram interpretation.
    Guglin ME; Thatai D
    Int J Cardiol; 2006 Jan; 106(2):232-7. PubMed ID: 16321696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of a new reduced lead set ECG with the standard ECG for diagnosing cardiac arrhythmias and myocardial ischemia.
    Drew BJ; Pelter MM; Brodnick DE; Yadav AV; Dempel D; Adams MG
    J Electrocardiol; 2002; 35 Suppl():13-21. PubMed ID: 12539095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Misdiagnosis of atrial fibrillation and its clinical consequences.
    Bogun F; Anh D; Kalahasty G; Wissner E; Bou Serhal C; Bazzi R; Weaver WD; Schuger C
    Am J Med; 2004 Nov; 117(9):636-42. PubMed ID: 15501200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparative accuracy of automated computer analysis versus physicans in training in the interpretation of electrocardiograms.
    Sekiguchi K; Kanda T; Osada M; Tsunoda Y; Kodajima N; Fukumura Y; Suzuki T; Kobayashi I
    J Med; 1999; 30(1-2):75-81. PubMed ID: 10515243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Electrocardiographic changes in a cohort of hypertensive patients in a community intervention program].
    Zamboni S; Ambrosio GB; Stefanini MG; Urbani V; Mazzucato L; Dal Palù C
    G Ital Cardiol; 1986 Nov; 16(11):922-33. PubMed ID: 2951291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [An ecg-program with multivariate diagnostic classification (author's transl)].
    Abel H; Zywietz C; Klusmeir S
    Z Kardiol; 1977 Mar; 66(3):146-9. PubMed ID: 140549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Arrhythmia diagnosis by the IBM electrocardiogram analysis program.
    Miyahara H; Endou K; Domae A; Sato T
    J Electrocardiol; 1980; 13(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 7359059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Clinical evaluation of a new computerized arrhythmia monitoring system.
    Hultgren HN; Shettigar UR; Specht DF
    Heart Lung; 1975; 4(2):241-51. PubMed ID: 1039979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The coming of age of computerized ECG processing: can it replace the cardiologist in epidemiological studies and clinical trials?
    Kors JA; van Herpen G
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2001; 84(Pt 2):1161-7. PubMed ID: 11604912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Experiences with different computerprograms for the ECG-analysis.
    Meyer J; Heinrich KW; Merx W; Effert S
    G Ital Cardiol; 1975; 5(2):279-87. PubMed ID: 1102376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Discordance of diagnosis of ventricular aneurysm made by the electrocardiogram and myocardial imaging: "ST-segment counterpoise" as a hypothetical mechanism.
    Madias JE
    J Electrocardiol; 2006 Jul; 39(3):340-1. PubMed ID: 16777523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Health Services Research and Development: the Veterans Administration Program.
    Goldschmidt PG
    Health Serv Res; 1986 Feb; 20(6 Pt 2):789-824. PubMed ID: 3081467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A method for evaluating computer programs for electrocardiographic interpretation. II. Application to version D of the PHS program and the Mayo Clinic program of 1968.
    Bailey JJ; Itscoitz SB; Grauer LE; Hirshfeld JW; Horton MR
    Circulation; 1974 Jul; 50(1):80-7. PubMed ID: 4276019
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Gender bias in cardiovascular testing persists after adjustment for presenting characteristics and cardiac risk.
    Chang AM; Mumma B; Sease KL; Robey JL; Shofer FS; Hollander JE
    Acad Emerg Med; 2007 Jul; 14(7):599-605. PubMed ID: 17538080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Axis divergence in electrocardiography as a sign of heart disease].
    Klinge R
    Z Kardiol; 1976 May; 65(5):467-77. PubMed ID: 936721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A method for evaluating computer programs for electrocardiographic interpretation. I. Application to the experimental IBM program of 1971.
    Bailey JJ; Itscoitz SB; Hirshfeld JW; Grauer LE; Horton MR
    Circulation; 1974 Jul; 50(1):73-9. PubMed ID: 4276018
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of EASI-derived 12-lead electrocardiograms versus paramedic-acquired 12-lead electrocardiograms using Mason-Likar limb lead configuration in patients with chest pain.
    Sejersten M; Pahlm O; Pettersson J; Zhou S; Maynard C; Feldman CL; Wagner GS
    J Electrocardiol; 2006 Jan; 39(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 16387044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.