These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

413 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15271050)

  • 1. Computer-aided learning in the real world of medical education: does the quality of interaction with the computer affect student learning?
    Hudson JN
    Med Educ; 2004 Aug; 38(8):887-95. PubMed ID: 15271050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Computer-assisted teaching of epistaxis management: a Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Glicksman JT; Brandt MG; Moukarbel RV; Rotenberg B; Fung K
    Laryngoscope; 2009 Mar; 119(3):466-72. PubMed ID: 19235749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative study on interactive computer-aided-learning and computer-aided-testing in patient-based dental training in maxillofacial surgery.
    Eitner S; Holst S; Wichmann M; Karl M; Nkenke E; Schlegel A
    Eur J Dent Educ; 2008 Feb; 12(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 18257763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Development and evaluation of a computer-assisted learning module on glomerulonephritis for medical students.
    Velan GM; Killen MT; Dziegielewski M; Kumar RK
    Med Teach; 2002 Jul; 24(4):412-6. PubMed ID: 12193326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Novel educational approach for medical students: improved retention rates using interactive medical software compared with traditional lecture-based format.
    Subramanian A; Timberlake M; Mittakanti H; Lara M; Brandt ML
    J Surg Educ; 2012; 69(2):253-6. PubMed ID: 22365876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improved student learning in ophthalmology with computer-aided instruction.
    Devitt P; Smith JR; Palmer E
    Eye (Lond); 2001 Oct; 15(Pt 5):635-9. PubMed ID: 11702976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of computer-assisted instruction (CAI) versus traditional textbook methods for training in abdominal examination (Japanese experience).
    Qayumi AK; Kurihara Y; Imai M; Pachev G; Seo H; Hoshino Y; Cheifetz R; Matsuura K; Momoi M; Saleem M; Lara-Guerra H; Miki Y; Kariya Y
    Med Educ; 2004 Oct; 38(10):1080-8. PubMed ID: 15461653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Students can learn medicine with computers. Evaluation of an interactive computer learning package in geriatric medicine.
    Andrews PV; Schwarz J; Helme RD
    Med J Aust; 1992 Nov; 157(10):693-5. PubMed ID: 1435413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Teaching undergraduates about familial breast cancer: comparison of a computer assisted learning (CAL) package with a traditional tutorial approach.
    Miedzybrodzka Z; Hamilton NM; Gregory H; Milner B; Frade I; Sinclair T; Mollison J; Haites N
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2001 Dec; 9(12):953-6. PubMed ID: 11840198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Computer-based training in dermatooncology--a preliminary report comparing electronic learning programs with face-to-face teaching].
    Smolle J; Staber R; Neges H; Reibnegger G; Kerl H
    J Dtsch Dermatol Ges; 2005 Nov; 3(11):883-8. PubMed ID: 16232275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Development and evaluation of an online computer-aided learning (CAL) package to promote small-animal welfare.
    Denwood M; Dale VH; Yam P
    J Vet Med Educ; 2008; 35(2):318-24. PubMed ID: 18723822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Undergraduate teaching in geriatric medicine using computer-aided learning improves student performance in examinations.
    Daunt LA; Umeonusulu PI; Gladman JR; Blundell AG; Conroy SP; Gordon AL
    Age Ageing; 2013 Jul; 42(4):541-4. PubMed ID: 23727555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Traditional teaching supported by computer-assisted learning for macroscopic anatomy.
    Elizondo-Omaña RE; Morales-Gómez JA; Guzmán SL; Hernández IL; Ibarra RP; Vilchez FC
    Anat Rec B New Anat; 2004 May; 278(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 15170688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Attitudes to e-learning, learning style and achievement in learning neuroanatomy by medical students.
    Svirko E; Mellanby J
    Med Teach; 2008; 30(9-10):e219-27. PubMed ID: 19117218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. IVIMEDS: a short report on an evaluation of the cardiovascular system learning module.
    Régo P; Ozolins I
    Med Teach; 2007 Nov; 29(9):961-5. PubMed ID: 18158672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of expert instruction and computer-based video training in teaching fundamental surgical skills to medical students.
    Nousiainen M; Brydges R; Backstein D; Dubrowski A
    Surgery; 2008 Apr; 143(4):539-44. PubMed ID: 18374052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Does computer-assisted instruction really help to improve the learning process?
    Vichitvejpaisal P; Sitthikongsak S; Preechakoon B; Kraiprasit K; Parakkamodom S; Manon C; Petcharatana S
    Med Educ; 2001 Oct; 35(10):983-9. PubMed ID: 11564203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Procedures can be learned on the Web: a randomized study of ultrasound-guided vascular access training.
    Chenkin J; Lee S; Huynh T; Bandiera G
    Acad Emerg Med; 2008 Oct; 15(10):949-54. PubMed ID: 18778380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Learner-control vs. program-control instructional multimedia: a comparison of two interactions when teaching principles of orthodontic appliances.
    Aly M; Elen J; Willems G
    Eur J Dent Educ; 2005 Nov; 9(4):157-63. PubMed ID: 16194247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Computer-assisted instruction versus traditional lecture for medical student teaching of dermatology morphology: a randomized control trial.
    Jenkins S; Goel R; Morrell DS
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2008 Aug; 59(2):255-9. PubMed ID: 18499299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.