BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15272949)

  • 21. Considering multiple criteria for social categorization can reduce intergroup bias.
    Hall NR; Crisp RJ
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2005 Oct; 31(10):1435-44. PubMed ID: 16143674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Diversity in in-group bias: structural factors, situational features, and social functions.
    Scheepers D; Spears R; Doosje B; Manstead AS
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2006 Jun; 90(6):944-60. PubMed ID: 16784344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Can music bring people together? Effects of shared musical preference on intergroup bias in adolescence.
    Bakagiannis S; Tarrant M
    Scand J Psychol; 2006 Apr; 47(2):129-36. PubMed ID: 16542355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effects of nonverbal behavior on perceptions of power bases.
    Aguinis H; Simonsen MM; Pierce CA
    J Soc Psychol; 1998 Aug; 138(4):455-69. PubMed ID: 9664862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effects of nonverbal behavior on perceptions of a female employee's power bases.
    Aguinis H; Henle CA
    J Soc Psychol; 2001 Aug; 141(4):537-49. PubMed ID: 11577851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Are the Powerful Really Blind to the Feelings of Others? How Hierarchical Concerns Shape Attention to Emotions.
    Stamkou E; van Kleef GA; Fischer AH; Kret ME
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2016 Jun; 42(6):755-68. PubMed ID: 27036499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Faculty members' use of power: midwifery students' perceptions and expectations.
    Kantek F; Gezer N
    Midwifery; 2010 Aug; 26(4):475-9. PubMed ID: 19081165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Give a person power and he or she will show interpersonal sensitivity: the phenomenon and its why and when.
    Schmid Mast M; Jonas K; Hall JA
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2009 Nov; 97(5):835-50. PubMed ID: 19857005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. On keeping your enemies close: powerful leaders seek proximity to ingroup power threats.
    Mead NL; Maner JK
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2012 Mar; 102(3):576-91. PubMed ID: 21988276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Power, propensity to negotiate, and moving first in competitive interactions.
    Magee JC; Galinsky AD; Gruenfeld DH
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2007 Feb; 33(2):200-12. PubMed ID: 17259581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Power in stereotypically masculine domains: a Social Influence Strategy X Stereotype Match model.
    Vescio TK; Snyder M; Butz DA
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2003 Dec; 85(6):1062-78. PubMed ID: 14674814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. You focus on the forest when you're in charge of the trees: power priming and abstract information processing.
    Smith PK; Trope Y
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2006 Apr; 90(4):578-96. PubMed ID: 16649856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Insecure status relations shape preferences for the content of intergroup contact.
    Saguy T; Dovidio JF
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2013 Aug; 39(8):1030-42. PubMed ID: 23719622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Differentiating the effects of status and power: a justice perspective.
    Blader SL; Chen YR
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2012 May; 102(5):994-1014. PubMed ID: 22229456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Defensive helping: threat to group identity, ingroup identification, status stability, and common group identity as determinants of intergroup help-giving.
    Nadler A; Harpaz-Gorodeisky G; Ben-David Y
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2009 Nov; 97(5):823-34. PubMed ID: 19857004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Powerful postures versus powerful roles: which is the proximate correlate of thought and behavior?
    Huang L; Galinsky AD; Gruenfeld DH; Guillory LE
    Psychol Sci; 2011 Jan; 22(1):95-102. PubMed ID: 21149853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. When power does not corrupt: superior individuation processes among powerful perceivers.
    Overbeck JR; Park B
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2001 Oct; 81(4):549-65. PubMed ID: 11642345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. When subordinates think of their ideals: power, legitimacy and regulatory focus.
    Willis GB; Rodríguez-Bailón R
    Span J Psychol; 2010 Nov; 13(2):777-87. PubMed ID: 20977026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Isonymic relationships in ethno-social categories (Argentinian colonial period) including illegitimate reproduction.
    Colantonio SE; Fuster V; Del Carmen M; Lascano JG
    J Biosoc Sci; 2006 May; 38(3):381-9. PubMed ID: 16613622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Crossed categorization in common ingroup contexts.
    Crisp RJ; Walsh J; Hewstone M
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2006 Sep; 32(9):1204-18. PubMed ID: 16902240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.