BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

67 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15272993)

  • 1. Discrimination and the positive-negative asymmetry effect: ideological and normative processes.
    Amiot CE; Bourhis RY
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2003 May; 29(5):597-608. PubMed ID: 15272993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Discrimination between dominant and subordinate groups: the positive-negative asymmetry effect and normative processes.
    Amiot CE; Bourhis RY
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2005 Jun; 44(Pt 2):289-308. PubMed ID: 16004650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Group identification moderates emotional responses to perceived prejudice.
    McCoy SK; Major B
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2003 Aug; 29(8):1005-17. PubMed ID: 15189619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Two forms of intergroup discrimination with positive and negative outcomes: explaining the positive-negative asymmetry effect.
    Gardham K; Brown R
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2001 Mar; 40(Pt 1):23-34. PubMed ID: 11329832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perceived discrimination as worldview threat or worldview confirmation: implications for self-esteem.
    Major B; Kaiser CR; O'Brien LT; McCoy SK
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2007 Jun; 92(6):1068-86. PubMed ID: 17547489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The ingroup as pars pro toto: projection from the ingroup onto the inclusive category as a precursor to social discrimination.
    Wenzel M; Mummendey A; Weber U; Waldzus S
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2003 Apr; 29(4):461-73. PubMed ID: 15273001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ingroup vitality and intergroup attitudes in a linguistic minority.
    Liebkind K; Jasinskaja-Lahti I; Teräsaho M
    Scand J Psychol; 2007 Oct; 48(5):409-18. PubMed ID: 17877556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Why are attributions to discrimination interpersonally costly? A test of system- and group-justifying motivations.
    Kaiser CR; Dyrenforth PS; Hagiwara N
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2006 Nov; 32(11):1523-536. PubMed ID: 17030885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. On the immediate consequences of intergroup categorization: activation of approach and avoidance motor behavior toward ingroup and outgroup members.
    Paladino MP; Castelli L
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2008 Jun; 34(6):755-68. PubMed ID: 18388255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Political ideology and American intergroup discrimination: A patriotism perspective.
    L Hoyt C; Goldin A
    J Soc Psychol; 2016; 156(4):369-81. PubMed ID: 26467846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perceiving personal discrimination: the role of group status and legitimizing ideology.
    Major B; Gramzow RH; McCoy SK; Levin S; Schmader T; Sidanius J
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2002 Mar; 82(3):269-82. PubMed ID: 11902616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Social identity in adolescence.
    Tarrant M; North AC; Edridge MD; Kirk LE; Smith EA; Turner RE
    J Adolesc; 2001 Oct; 24(5):597-609. PubMed ID: 11676507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Intergroup discrimination in the minimal group paradigm: categorization, reciprocation, or fear?
    Gaertner L; Insko CA
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2000 Jul; 79(1):77-94. PubMed ID: 10909879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Decomposing identity: differential relationships between several aspects of ethnic identity and the negative effects of perceived discrimination among First Nations adults in Canada.
    Bombay A; Matheson K; Anisman H
    Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol; 2010 Oct; 16(4):507-16. PubMed ID: 21058814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Differential relationships between intergroup contact and affective and cognitive dimensions of prejudice.
    Tropp LR; Pettigrew TF
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2005 Aug; 31(8):1145-58. PubMed ID: 16000274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Real groups in the minimal group paradigm; does the group context work as corrective or catalysing agent for social discrimination?].
    Petersen LE; Blank H
    Z Exp Psychol; 2001; 48(4):302-16. PubMed ID: 11688145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The influence of discrimination and fairness on collective self-esteem.
    Scheepers D; Spears R; Manstead AS; Doosje B
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2009 Apr; 35(4):506-15. PubMed ID: 19139161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mood as information in making attributions to discrimination.
    Sechrist GB; Swim JK; Mark MM
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2003 Apr; 29(4):524-31. PubMed ID: 15273005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ingroup perception and responses to stigma among persons with mental illness.
    Rüsch N; Corrigan PW; Wassel A; Michaels P; Olschewski M; Wilkniss S; Batia K
    Acta Psychiatr Scand; 2009 Oct; 120(4):320-8. PubMed ID: 19485961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Social norms and the expression and suppression of prejudice: the struggle for internalization.
    Crandall CS; Eshleman A; O'Brien L
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2002 Mar; 82(3):359-78. PubMed ID: 11902622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.