These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

254 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15272998)

  • 1. Lying words: predicting deception from linguistic styles.
    Newman ML; Pennebaker JW; Berry DS; Richards JM
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2003 May; 29(5):665-75. PubMed ID: 15272998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An empirical test of the behaviour analysis interview.
    Vrij A; Mann S; Fisher RP
    Law Hum Behav; 2006 Jun; 30(3):329-45. PubMed ID: 16718581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Truth or lie: Exploring the language of deception.
    Sarzynska-Wawer J; Pawlak A; Szymanowska J; Hanusz K; Wawer A
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(2):e0281179. PubMed ID: 36730363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Strategic use of evidence during police interviews: when training to detect deception works.
    Hartwig M; Granhag PA; Strömwall LA; Kronkvist O
    Law Hum Behav; 2006 Oct; 30(5):603-19. PubMed ID: 16977348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cues to deception and ability to detect lies as a function of police interview styles.
    Vrij A; Mann S; Kristen S; Fisher RP
    Law Hum Behav; 2007 Oct; 31(5):499-518. PubMed ID: 17211691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Are computers effective lie detectors? A meta-analysis of linguistic cues to deception.
    Hauch V; Blandón-Gitlin I; Masip J; Sporer SL
    Pers Soc Psychol Rev; 2015 Nov; 19(4):307-42. PubMed ID: 25387767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Measuring emotional expression with the Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count.
    Kahn JH; Tobin RM; Massey AE; Anderson JA
    Am J Psychol; 2007; 120(2):263-86. PubMed ID: 17650921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Increasing cognitive load to facilitate lie detection: the benefit of recalling an event in reverse order.
    Vrij A; Mann SA; Fisher RP; Leal S; Milne R; Bull R
    Law Hum Behav; 2008 Jun; 32(3):253-65. PubMed ID: 17694424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cues to deception.
    DePaulo BM; Lindsay JJ; Malone BE; Muhlenbruck L; Charlton K; Cooper H
    Psychol Bull; 2003 Jan; 129(1):74-118. PubMed ID: 12555795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cues to deception: can complications, common knowledge details, and self-handicapping strategies discriminate between truths, embedded lies and outright lies in an Italian-speaking sample?
    Caso L; Cavagnis L; Vrij A; Palena N
    Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1128194. PubMed ID: 37179853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Statements about true and false intentions: using the Cognitive Interview to magnify the differences.
    Sooniste T; Granhag PA; Strömwall LA; Vrij A
    Scand J Psychol; 2015 Aug; 56(4):371-8. PubMed ID: 25929812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Partners under Pressure: Examining the Consistency of True and False Alibi Statements.
    Sakrisvold ML; Granhag PA; Mac Giolla E
    Behav Sci Law; 2017 Jan; 35(1):75-90. PubMed ID: 28247431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Truth-tellers stand the test of time and contradict evidence less than liars, even months after a crime.
    Sukumar D; Wade KA; Hodgson JS
    Law Hum Behav; 2018 Apr; 42(2):145-155. PubMed ID: 29672094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Detecting true and false opinions: The Devil's Advocate approach as a lie detection aid.
    Leal S; Vrij A; Mann S; Fisher RP
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Jul; 134(3):323-9. PubMed ID: 20398882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Linguistic analyses of natural written language: unobtrusive assessment of cognitive style in eating disorders.
    Wolf M; Sedway J; Bulik CM; Kordy H
    Int J Eat Disord; 2007 Dec; 40(8):711-7. PubMed ID: 17683092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A stability bias effect among deceivers.
    Harvey AC; Vrij A; Hope L; Leal S; Mann S
    Law Hum Behav; 2017 Dec; 41(6):519-529. PubMed ID: 28726439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Lies and medicine: reflections on the etiology, pathology, and diagnosis of chronic lying.
    Renshaw DC
    Clin Ther; 1993; 15(2):465-73; discussion 432. PubMed ID: 8519052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Using Named Entities for Computer-Automated Verbal Deception Detection.
    Kleinberg B; Mozes M; Arntz A; Verschuere B
    J Forensic Sci; 2018 May; 63(3):714-723. PubMed ID: 28940300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Markers of good planning behavior as a cue for separating true and false intent.
    Mac Giolla E; Granhag PA; Liu-Jönsson M
    Psych J; 2013 Dec; 2(3):183-9. PubMed ID: 26271363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Retelling urban legends.
    Fox Tree JE; Weldon MS
    Am J Psychol; 2007; 120(3):459-76. PubMed ID: 17892088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.