These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15273034)

  • 1. A comparison of face-to-face and videoconference administration of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale.
    Kobak KA
    J Telemed Telecare; 2004; 10(4):231-5. PubMed ID: 15273034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of face-to-face and remote assessment of inter-rater reliability on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale via videoconferencing.
    Kobak KA; Williams JB; Engelhardt N
    Psychiatry Res; 2008 Feb; 158(1):99-103. PubMed ID: 17961715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Face-to-face versus remote administration of the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale using videoconference and telephone.
    Kobak KA; Williams JB; Jeglic E; Salvucci D; Sharp IR
    Depress Anxiety; 2008; 25(11):913-9. PubMed ID: 17941100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Inter-rater reliability of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale as a diagnostic and outcome measure of depression in primary care.
    Morriss R; Leese M; Chatwin J; Baldwin D;
    J Affect Disord; 2008 Dec; 111(2-3):204-13. PubMed ID: 18374987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Client satisfaction in a feasibility study comparing face-to-face interviews with telepsychiatry.
    Bishop JE; O'Reilly RL; Maddox K; Hutchinson LJ
    J Telemed Telecare; 2002; 8(4):217-21. PubMed ID: 12217104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The new GRID Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression demonstrates excellent inter-rater reliability for inexperienced and experienced raters before and after training.
    Tabuse H; Kalali A; Azuma H; Ozaki N; Iwata N; Naitoh H; Higuchi T; Kanba S; Shioe K; Akechi T; Furukawa TA
    Psychiatry Res; 2007 Sep; 153(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 17445908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Application of telepsychiatry: a preliminary study.
    Matsuura S; Hosaka T; Yukiyama T; Ogushi Y; Okada Y; Haruki Y; Nakamura M
    Psychiatry Clin Neurosci; 2000 Feb; 54(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 15558880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Site versus centralized raters in a clinical depression trial: impact on patient selection and placebo response.
    Kobak KA; Leuchter A; DeBrota D; Engelhardt N; Williams JB; Cook IA; Leon AC; Alpert J
    J Clin Psychopharmacol; 2010 Apr; 30(2):193-7. PubMed ID: 20520295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Depression and somatic symptoms scale: a new scale with both depression and somatic symptoms emphasized.
    Hung CI; Weng LJ; Su YJ; Liu CY
    Psychiatry Clin Neurosci; 2006 Dec; 60(6):700-8. PubMed ID: 17109704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Measuring depression: comparison and integration of three scales in the GENDEP study.
    Uher R; Farmer A; Maier W; Rietschel M; Hauser J; Marusic A; Mors O; Elkin A; Williamson RJ; Schmael C; Henigsberg N; Perez J; Mendlewicz J; Janzing JG; Zobel A; Skibinska M; Kozel D; Stamp AS; Bajs M; Placentino A; Barreto M; McGuffin P; Aitchison KJ
    Psychol Med; 2008 Feb; 38(2):289-300. PubMed ID: 17922940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The GRID-HAMD: standardization of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale.
    Williams JB; Kobak KA; Bech P; Engelhardt N; Evans K; Lipsitz J; Olin J; Pearson J; Kalali A
    Int Clin Psychopharmacol; 2008 May; 23(3):120-9. PubMed ID: 18408526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Validity and reliability of the Hamilton depression rating scale (5 items) for manic and mixed bipolar disorders.
    González-Pinto A; Mosquera F; Reed C; Novick D; Barbeito S; Vega P; Bertsch J; Alberich S; Haro JM
    J Nerv Ment Dis; 2009 Sep; 197(9):682-6. PubMed ID: 19752648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [The analogous self-rating scale of affect as a tool in the assessment of change of clinical status of patients with endogenous depression syndrome. A comparison with the Hamilton depression scale].
    Slósarska M; Boresewicz M; Wójcik M
    Psychiatr Pol; 1992; 26(3-4):197-205. PubMed ID: 1301599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using longitudinal data from a clinical trial in depression to assess the reliability of its outcome scales.
    Laenen A; Alonso A; Molenberghs G; Vangeneugden T; Mallinckrodt CH
    J Psychiatr Res; 2009 Apr; 43(7):730-8. PubMed ID: 18986657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An Item Response analysis of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale using shared data from two pharmaceutical companies.
    Evans KR; Sills T; DeBrota DJ; Gelwicks S; Engelhardt N; Santor D
    J Psychiatr Res; 2004; 38(3):275-84. PubMed ID: 15003433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Computerized assessment of depression and anxiety over the telephone using interactive voice response.
    Kobak KA; Greist JH; Jefferson JW; Mundt JC; Katzelnick DJ
    MD Comput; 1999; 16(3):64-8. PubMed ID: 10439605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Symptoms of anxiety in depression: assessment of item performance of the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale in patients with depression.
    Vaccarino AL; Evans KR; Sills TL; Kalali AH
    Depress Anxiety; 2008; 25(12):1006-13. PubMed ID: 18800370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Development and psychometric evaluation of a Japanese scale to assess depression severity: Himorogi Self-rating Depression Scale.
    Mimura C; Murashige M; Oda T; Watanabe Y
    Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract; 2011 Mar; 15(1):50-5. PubMed ID: 22122689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Bipolar Depression Rating Scale (BDRS): its development, validation and utility.
    Berk M; Malhi GS; Cahill C; Carman AC; Hadzi-Pavlovic D; Hawkins MT; Tohen M; Mitchell PB
    Bipolar Disord; 2007 Sep; 9(6):571-9. PubMed ID: 17845271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sources of unreliability in depression ratings.
    Kobak KA; Brown B; Sharp I; Levy-Mack H; Wells K; Ockun F; Williams JB
    J Clin Psychopharmacol; 2009 Feb; 29(1):82-5. PubMed ID: 19142114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.