494 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15273331)
1. Rectal cancer: local staging and assessment of lymph node involvement with endoluminal US, CT, and MR imaging--a meta-analysis.
Bipat S; Glas AS; Slors FJ; Zwinderman AH; Bossuyt PM; Stoker J
Radiology; 2004 Sep; 232(3):773-83. PubMed ID: 15273331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Preoperative staging of rectal cancer: comparison of 3-T high-field MRI and endorectal sonography.
Chun HK; Choi D; Kim MJ; Lee J; Yun SH; Kim SH; Lee SJ; Kim CK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Dec; 187(6):1557-62. PubMed ID: 17114550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Detection of lymph node metastases in head and neck cancer: a meta-analysis comparing US, USgFNAC, CT and MR imaging.
de Bondt RB; Nelemans PJ; Hofman PA; Casselman JW; Kremer B; van Engelshoven JM; Beets-Tan RG
Eur J Radiol; 2007 Nov; 64(2):266-72. PubMed ID: 17391885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluating local lymph node metastasis with magnetic resonance imaging, endoluminal ultrasound and computed tomography in rectal cancer: a meta-analysis.
Li XT; Sun YS; Tang L; Cao K; Zhang XY
Colorectal Dis; 2015 Jun; 17(6):O129-35. PubMed ID: 25628186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diagnostic Accuracy of MRI for Assessment of T Category and Circumferential Resection Margin Involvement in Patients With Rectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.
Zhang G; Cai YZ; Xu GH
Dis Colon Rectum; 2016 Aug; 59(8):789-99. PubMed ID: 27384098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Radiologic staging in patients with endometrial cancer: a meta-analysis.
Kinkel K; Kaji Y; Yu KK; Segal MR; Lu Y; Powell CB; Hricak H
Radiology; 1999 Sep; 212(3):711-8. PubMed ID: 10478237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography for lateral lymph node metastasis in rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Hoshino N; Murakami K; Hida K; Sakamoto T; Sakai Y
Int J Clin Oncol; 2019 Jan; 24(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 30259217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. CT and MR imaging in the staging of colorectal carcinoma: report of the Radiology Diagnostic Oncology Group II.
Zerhouni EA; Rutter C; Hamilton SR; Balfe DM; Megibow AJ; Francis IR; Moss AA; Heiken JP; Tempany CM; Aisen AM; Weinreb JC; Gatsonis C; McNeil BJ
Radiology; 1996 Aug; 200(2):443-51. PubMed ID: 8685340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in staging of uterine cervical carcinoma: a systematic review.
Bipat S; Glas AS; van der Velden J; Zwinderman AH; Bossuyt PM; Stoker J
Gynecol Oncol; 2003 Oct; 91(1):59-66. PubMed ID: 14529663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Radiological evaluation of lymph node metastases in patients with cervical cancer. A meta-analysis.
Scheidler J; Hricak H; Yu KK; Subak L; Segal MR
JAMA; 1997 Oct; 278(13):1096-101. PubMed ID: 9315770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Preoperative local staging of rectal carcinoma with MR imaging and a rectal balloon.
Okizuka H; Sugimura K; Ishida T
J Magn Reson Imaging; 1993; 3(2):329-35. PubMed ID: 8448394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Preoperative 3T MR imaging of rectal cancer: local staging accuracy using a two-dimensional and three-dimensional T2-weighted turbo spin echo sequence.
Fütterer JJ; Yakar D; Strijk SP; Barentsz JO
Eur J Radiol; 2008 Jan; 65(1):66-71. PubMed ID: 18164156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Lymph node metastasis: ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced MR imaging versus PET/CT in a rabbit model.
Choi SH; Moon WK; Hong JH; Son KR; Cho N; Kwon BJ; Lee JJ; Chung JK; Min HS; Park SH
Radiology; 2007 Jan; 242(1):137-43. PubMed ID: 17090719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Staging of advanced ovarian cancer: comparison of imaging modalities--report from the Radiological Diagnostic Oncology Group.
Tempany CM; Zou KH; Silverman SG; Brown DL; Kurtz AB; McNeil BJ
Radiology; 2000 Jun; 215(3):761-7. PubMed ID: 10831697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Staging rectal cancer by MR and CT.
Butch RJ; Stark DD; Wittenberg J; Tepper JE; Saini S; Simeone JF; Mueller PR; Ferrucci JT
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1986 Jun; 146(6):1155-60. PubMed ID: 3486559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diagnostic accuracy of MRI for assessment of T category, lymph node metastases, and circumferential resection margin involvement in patients with rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Al-Sukhni E; Milot L; Fruitman M; Beyene J; Victor JC; Schmocker S; Brown G; McLeod R; Kennedy E
Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Jul; 19(7):2212-23. PubMed ID: 22271205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Imaging for predicting the risk factors--the circumferential resection margin and nodal disease--of local recurrence in rectal cancer: a meta-analysis.
Lahaye MJ; Engelen SM; Nelemans PJ; Beets GL; van de Velde CJ; van Engelshoven JM; Beets-Tan RG
Semin Ultrasound CT MR; 2005 Aug; 26(4):259-68. PubMed ID: 16152740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative study of transrectal ultrasonography, pelvic computerized tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative staging of rectal cancer.
Kim NK; Kim MJ; Yun SH; Sohn SK; Min JS
Dis Colon Rectum; 1999 Jun; 42(6):770-5. PubMed ID: 10378601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Locally advanced rectal cancer: MR imaging for restaging after neoadjuvant radiation therapy with concomitant chemotherapy. Part II. What are the criteria to predict involved lymph nodes?
Lahaye MJ; Beets GL; Engelen SM; Kessels AG; de Bruïne AP; Kwee HW; van Engelshoven JM; van de Velde CJ; Beets-Tan RG
Radiology; 2009 Jul; 252(1):81-91. PubMed ID: 19403848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. CT and MR imaging in staging non-small cell bronchogenic carcinoma: report of the Radiologic Diagnostic Oncology Group.
Webb WR; Gatsonis C; Zerhouni EA; Heelan RT; Glazer GM; Francis IR; McNeil BJ
Radiology; 1991 Mar; 178(3):705-13. PubMed ID: 1847239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
