238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15273332)
1. Stereotactic 11-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: influence of number of specimens on diagnostic accuracy.
Lomoschitz FM; Helbich TH; Rudas M; Pfarl G; Linnau KF; Stadler A; Jackman RJ
Radiology; 2004 Sep; 232(3):897-903. PubMed ID: 15273332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Lobular neoplasia at 11-gauge vacuum-assisted stereotactic biopsy: correlation with surgical excisional biopsy and mammographic follow-up.
Mahoney MC; Robinson-Smith TM; Shaughnessy EA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Oct; 187(4):949-54. PubMed ID: 16985141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Add-on device for stereotactic core-needle breast biopsy: how many biopsy specimens are needed for a reliable diagnosis?
Koskela AK; Sudah M; Berg MH; Kärjä VJ; Mustonen PK; Kataja V; Vanninen RS
Radiology; 2005 Sep; 236(3):801-9. PubMed ID: 16020555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Underestimation of atypical ductal hyperplasia at MRI-guided 9-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy.
Liberman L; Holland AE; Marjan D; Murray MP; Bartella L; Morris EA; Dershaw DD; Wynn RT
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Mar; 188(3):684-90. PubMed ID: 17312054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Atypical ductal hyperplasia: histologic underestimation of carcinoma in tissue harvested from impalpable breast lesions using 11-gauge stereotactically guided directional vacuum-assisted biopsy.
Brem RF; Behrndt VS; Sanow L; Gatewood OM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 May; 172(5):1405-7. PubMed ID: 10227526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Atypical ductal hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ as revealed by large-core needle breast biopsy: results of surgical excision.
Darling ML; Smith DN; Lester SC; Kaelin C; Selland DL; Denison CM; DiPiro PJ; Rose DI; Rhei E; Meyer JE
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Nov; 175(5):1341-6. PubMed ID: 11044038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Two-year follow-up of stereotactically guided 9-G breast biopsy: a multicenter evaluation of a self-contained vacuum-assisted device.
Pfleiderer SO; Brunzlow H; Schulz-Wendtland R; Pamilo M; Vag T; Camara O; Facius M; Runnebaum IB; Dean PB; Kaiser WA
Clin Imaging; 2009; 33(5):343-7. PubMed ID: 19712812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed at 11-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy performed on suspicious clustered microcalcifications: could patients without residual microcalcifications be managed conservatively?
Villa A; Tagliafico A; Chiesa F; Chiaramondia M; Friedman D; Calabrese M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Oct; 197(4):1012-8. PubMed ID: 21940593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Breast microcalcifications: retrieval failure at prone stereotactic core and vacuum breast biopsy--frequency, causes, and outcome.
Jackman RJ; Rodriguez-Soto J
Radiology; 2006 Apr; 239(1):61-70. PubMed ID: 16567483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed at stereotactic breast biopsy: improved reliability with 14-gauge, directional, vacuum-assisted biopsy.
Jackman RJ; Burbank F; Parker SH; Evans WP; Lechner MC; Richardson TR; Tocino I; Wray AB
Radiology; 1997 Aug; 204(2):485-8. PubMed ID: 9240540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Stereotactic breast biopsy of atypical ductal hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ lesions: improved accuracy with directional, vacuum-assisted biopsy.
Burbank F
Radiology; 1997 Mar; 202(3):843-7. PubMed ID: 9051043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Calcification retrieval at stereotactic, 11-gauge, directional, vacuum-assisted breast biopsy.
Liberman L; Smolkin JH; Dershaw DD; Morris EA; Abramson AF; Rosen PP
Radiology; 1998 Jul; 208(1):251-60. PubMed ID: 9646821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. False-negative diagnoses at stereotactic vacuum-assisted needle breast biopsy: long-term follow-up of 1,280 lesions and review of the literature.
Jackman RJ; Marzoni FA; Rosenberg J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Feb; 192(2):341-51. PubMed ID: 19155393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Stereotactic breast biopsy of nonpalpable lesions: determinants of ductal carcinoma in situ underestimation rates.
Jackman RJ; Burbank F; Parker SH; Evans WP; Lechner MC; Richardson TR; Smid AA; Borofsky HB; Lee CH; Goldstein HM; Schilling KJ; Wray AB; Brem RF; Helbich TH; Lehrer DE; Adler SJ
Radiology; 2001 Feb; 218(2):497-502. PubMed ID: 11161168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of needle size for breast biopsy: comparison of 14-, 16-, and 18-gauge biopsy needles.
Helbich TH; Rudas M; Haitel A; Kohlberger PD; Thurnher M; Gnant M; Wunderbaldinger P; Wolf G; Mostbeck GH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jul; 171(1):59-63. PubMed ID: 9648764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Stereotactic 9-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy, how many specimens are needed?
den Dekker BM; van Diest PJ; de Waard SN; Verkooijen HM; Pijnappel RM
Eur J Radiol; 2019 Nov; 120():108665. PubMed ID: 31563108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Frequency and upgrade rates of atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed at stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: 9-versus 11-gauge.
Eby PR; Ochsner JE; DeMartini WB; Allison KH; Peacock S; Lehman CD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Jan; 192(1):229-34. PubMed ID: 19098204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Upright stereotactic vacuum-assisted needle biopsy of suspicious breast microcalcifications.
Sim LS; Kei PL
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2008 Aug; 52(4):358-64. PubMed ID: 18811759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Calcifications highly suggestive of malignancy: comparison of breast biopsy methods.
Liberman L; Gougoutas CA; Zakowski MF; LaTrenta LR; Abramson AF; Morris EA; Dershaw DD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Jul; 177(1):165-72. PubMed ID: 11418420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Stereotactic breast biopsy: comparison of histologic underestimation rates with 11- and 9-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy.
Lourenco AP; Mainiero MB; Lazarus E; Giri D; Schepps B
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Nov; 189(5):W275-9. PubMed ID: 17954625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
