These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15273786)

  • 21. Photoelastic stress patterns produced by implant-retained overdentures.
    Kenney R; Richards MW
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Nov; 80(5):559-64. PubMed ID: 9813806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Stress distribution in bone simulation model with pre-angled implants.
    Goiato MC; Arsufi GS; de Medeiros RA; Pesqueira AA; Guiotti AM; dos Santos DM
    J Med Eng Technol; 2015; 39(6):322-7. PubMed ID: 26100976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Finite element analysis of effect of prosthesis height, angle of force application, and implant offset on supporting bone.
    Sütpideler M; Eckert SE; Zobitz M; An KN
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(6):819-25. PubMed ID: 15623056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Photoelastic analysis of stresses transmitted by universal cast to long abutment on implant-supported single restorations under static occlusal loads.
    Aguiar FA; Tiossi R; Macedo AP; Mattos Mda G; Ribeiro RF; Rodrigues RC
    J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Nov; 23(7 Suppl 1):2019-23. PubMed ID: 23154374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Influence of Metal and Ceramic Abutments on the Stress Distribution Around Narrow Implants: A Photoelastic Stress Analysis.
    Galvão GH; Grossi JA; Zielak JC; Giovanini AF; Furuse AY; Gonzaga CC
    Implant Dent; 2016 Aug; 25(4):499-503. PubMed ID: 26963745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of stress distribution around vertical and angled implants with finite-element analysis.
    Canay S; Hersek N; Akpinar I; Aşik Z
    Quintessence Int; 1996 Sep; 27(9):591-8. PubMed ID: 9180415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of different implant configurations for a mandibular fixed prosthesis.
    Fazi G; Tellini S; Vangi D; Branchi R
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):752-9. PubMed ID: 21841984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Photoelastic stress analysis of different designs of cement-retained fixed partial dentures on Morse taper oral implants.
    Menani LR; Tiossi R; de Torres ÉM; Ribeiro RF; de Almeida RP
    J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 22(2):674-8. PubMed ID: 21415635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Influence of occlusal forces on stress distribution in preloaded dental implant screws.
    Alkan I; Sertgöz A; Ekici B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Apr; 91(4):319-25. PubMed ID: 15116032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Influence of crown-to-implant ratio on stress around single short-wide implants: a photoelastic stress analysis.
    Sotto-Maior BS; Senna PM; da Silva-Neto JP; de Arruda Nóbilo MA; Del Bel Cury AA
    J Prosthodont; 2015 Jan; 24(1):52-6. PubMed ID: 24919655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Photoelastic stress analysis of load transfer to implants and natural teeth comparing rigid and semirigid connectors.
    Nishimura RD; Ochiai KT; Caputo AA; Jeong CM
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 Jun; 81(6):696-703. PubMed ID: 10347358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A comparison of stress and strain distribution characteristics of two different rigid implant designs for distal-extension fixed prostheses.
    Akpinar I; Demirel F; Parnas L; Sahin S
    Quintessence Int; 1996 Jan; 27(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 9063207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Distribution of peri-implant stresses with a countertorque device.
    Sendyk CL; Lopez TT; de Araujo CA; Sendyk WR; Goncalvez VF
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(2):e98-e105. PubMed ID: 23527374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Tilted orthodontic micro implants: a photoelastic stress analysis.
    Çehreli S; Özçırpıcı AA; Yılmaz A
    Eur J Orthod; 2013 Oct; 35(5):563-7. PubMed ID: 21745828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Combination of straight and tilted implants for supporting screw-retained dental prostheses in atrophic posterior maxillae: A 2-year prospective study.
    Casar-Espinosa JC; Castillo-Oyagüe R; Serrera-Figallo MÁ; Garrido-Serrano R; Lynch CD; Menéndez-Collar M; Torres-Lagares D; Gutiérrez-Pérez JL
    J Dent; 2017 Aug; 63():85-93. PubMed ID: 28587977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Photoelastic stress analysis of various retention mechanisms on 3-implant-retained mandibular overdentures.
    Celik G; Uludag B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Apr; 97(4):229-35. PubMed ID: 17499093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Finite element analysis to determine implant preload.
    Lang LA; Kang B; Wang RF; Lang BR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Dec; 90(6):539-46. PubMed ID: 14668754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Finite element stress analysis of dental prostheses supported by straight and angled implants.
    Cruz M; Wassall T; Toledo EM; da Silva Barra LP; Cruz S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(3):391-403. PubMed ID: 19587860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Microstrain around dental implants supporting fixed partial prostheses under axial and non-axial loading conditions, in vitro strain gauge analysis.
    de Vasconcellos LG; Nishioka RS; de Vasconcellos LM; Balducci I; Kojima AN
    J Craniofac Surg; 2013 Nov; 24(6):e546-51. PubMed ID: 24220463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Straight and offset implant placement under axial and nonaxial loads in implant-supported prostheses: strain gauge analysis.
    Abreu CW; Nishioka RS; Balducci I; Consani RL
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Oct; 21(7):535-9. PubMed ID: 22905920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.