These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 152738)
1. The Saikewicz precedent: what's good for an incompetent patient? Ramsey P Hastings Cent Rep; 1978 Dec; 8(6):36-42. PubMed ID: 152738 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Reconciling Quinlan and Saikewicz: decision making for the terminally ill incompetent. Annas GJ Am J Law Med; 1979; 4(4):367-96. PubMed ID: 507056 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Incompetent's right to die: who decides? Bernstein AH Hospitals; 1979 Sep; 53(17):39, 42. PubMed ID: 457072 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Decisions not to treat: the Saikewicz case and its aftermath. Glantz LH; Swazey JP Forum Med; 1979 Jan; 2(1):22-32. PubMed ID: 10289145 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Who speaks for incompetent patients? The case of Joseph Saikewicz. Carroll PR Trustee; 1978 Dec; 31(12):19, 21-2, 24. PubMed ID: 10239592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Judicial approach beginning to develop for terminating life support systems. Part 1. Weissburg C; Hartz JN Rev Fed Am Hosp; 1979 Aug; 12(4):44-8. PubMed ID: 10242941 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Post-Saikewicz judicial actions clarify the rights of patients and families. Glantz LH Medicoleg News; 1978; 6(4):9-11. PubMed ID: 10240215 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Treatment of incompetent terminally ill patients. 1. The American experience. Thomson CJ Med J Aust; 1982 Feb; 1(4):188-90. PubMed ID: 7078492 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The Saikewicz decision: a medical viewpoint. Relman AS Am J Law Med; 1978; 4(3):233-42. PubMed ID: 736045 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Medical paternalism or legal imperialism: not the only alternatives for handling Saikewicz-type cases. Buchanan A Am J Law Med; 1979; 5(2):97-117. PubMed ID: 507063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. More on appropriate decision making for the terminally ill incompetent patient. Norris JA Am J Law Med; 1979; 5(2):i-vi. PubMed ID: 507059 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Refusing medical treatment: who decides? Barnes G Dimens Health Serv; 1982 Nov; 59(11):24-6. PubMed ID: 7141151 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Termination of medical treatment: a judicial perspective. Ackerman JW; Pope MC J Leg Med; 1982 Jun; 3(2):211-43. PubMed ID: 6981677 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Medicine and human rights: emerging substantive standards and procedural protections for medical decision making within the American family. Baron CH J Geriatr Psychiatry; 1985; 18(2):95-141. PubMed ID: 4086738 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The Canadian Charter of Rights and individual choice in treatment. Ferguson G Health Law Can; 1988; 8(3):63-70, 85. PubMed ID: 10312613 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Medical ethics after Quinlan: guidelines and the ethics of dying. Hudson RP J Kans Med Soc; 1982 Jul; 83(7):371-5, 340. PubMed ID: 7119537 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Refusing medical treatment: incompetent adults. Barnes G Dimens Health Serv; 1983 Apr; 60(4):26-7, 29-30. PubMed ID: 6852401 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Refusing treatment for incompetent patients; why Quinlan and Saikewicz cases agree on roles of guardians, physicians, judges, and ethics committees. Annas GJ N Y State J Med; 1980 Apr; 80(5):816-21. PubMed ID: 6930563 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The campaign to deny terminally ill patients information and choices at the end of life. Tucker KL J Leg Med; 2009; 30(4):495-514. PubMed ID: 19953404 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]