145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15273952)
1. Methods for modelling change in cluster randomization trials.
Klar N; Darlington G
Stat Med; 2004 Aug; 23(15):2341-57. PubMed ID: 15273952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Imputation strategies for missing continuous outcomes in cluster randomized trials.
Taljaard M; Donner A; Klar N
Biom J; 2008 Jun; 50(3):329-45. PubMed ID: 18537126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of the statistical power of different methods for the analysis of cluster randomization trials with binary outcomes.
Austin PC
Stat Med; 2007 Aug; 26(19):3550-65. PubMed ID: 17238238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Multilevel analysis of group-randomized trials with binary outcomes.
Kim HY; Preisser JS; Rozier RG; Valiyaparambil JV
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2006 Aug; 34(4):241-51. PubMed ID: 16856945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Baseline adjustments for binary data in repeated cross-sectional cluster randomized trials.
Nixon RM; Thompson SG
Stat Med; 2003 Sep; 22(17):2673-92. PubMed ID: 12939779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparing completely and stratified randomized designs in cluster randomized trials when the stratifying factor is cluster size: a simulation study.
Lewsey JD
Stat Med; 2004 Mar; 23(6):897-905. PubMed ID: 15027079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sample size calculations for 3-level cluster randomized trials.
Teerenstra S; Moerbeek M; van Achterberg T; Pelzer BJ; Borm GF
Clin Trials; 2008; 5(5):486-95. PubMed ID: 18827041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Meta-analysis of community-based cluster randomization trials with binary outcomes.
Darlington GA; Donner A
Clin Trials; 2007; 4(5):491-8. PubMed ID: 17942465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. On design considerations and randomization-based inference for community intervention trials.
Gail MH; Mark SD; Carroll RJ; Green SB; Pee D
Stat Med; 1996 Jun; 15(11):1069-92. PubMed ID: 8804140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Random effects probit and logistic regression models for three-level data.
Gibbons RD; Hedeker D
Biometrics; 1997 Dec; 53(4):1527-37. PubMed ID: 9423267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sample size re-estimation in cluster randomization trials.
Lake S; Kammann E; Klar N; Betensky R
Stat Med; 2002 May; 21(10):1337-50. PubMed ID: 12185888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of cluster randomization on sample size in prevention research.
Baskerville NB; Hogg W; Lemelin J
J Fam Pract; 2001 Mar; 50(3):W241-6. PubMed ID: 11252223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Statistical analysis of community-based studies -- presentation and comparison of possible solutions with reference to statistical meta-analytic methods].
Twardella D; Bruckner T; Blettner M
Gesundheitswesen; 2005 Jan; 67(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 15672306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bayesian methods for analysis of binary outcome data in cluster randomized trials on the absolute risk scale.
Thompson SG; Warn DE; Turner RM
Stat Med; 2004 Feb; 23(3):389-410. PubMed ID: 14748035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A simulation study of odds ratio estimation for binary outcomes from cluster randomized trials.
Ukoumunne OC; Carlin JB; Gulliford MC
Stat Med; 2007 Aug; 26(18):3415-28. PubMed ID: 17154246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of confidence interval methods for the intraclass correlation coefficient in cluster randomized trials.
Ukoumunne OC
Stat Med; 2002 Dec; 21(24):3757-74. PubMed ID: 12483765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cluster randomized controlled trials in primary care: an introduction.
Murphy AW; Esterman A; Pilotto LS
Eur J Gen Pract; 2006; 12(2):70-3. PubMed ID: 16945880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pseudo cluster randomization: a treatment allocation method to minimize contamination and selection bias.
Borm GF; Melis RJ; Teerenstra S; Peer PG
Stat Med; 2005 Dec; 24(23):3535-47. PubMed ID: 16007575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of tests for categorical data from a stratified cluster randomized trial.
Dobbins TA; Simpson JM
Stat Med; 2002 Dec; 21(24):3835-46. PubMed ID: 12483770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Longitudinal and repeated cross-sectional cluster-randomization designs using mixed effects regression for binary outcomes: bias and coverage of frequentist and Bayesian methods.
Localio AR; Berlin JA; Have TR
Stat Med; 2006 Aug; 25(16):2720-36. PubMed ID: 16345043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
