BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

843 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15274062)

  • 1. Mammographic screening: patterns of use and estimated impact on breast carcinoma survival.
    Blanchard K; Colbert JA; Puri D; Weissman J; Moy B; Kopans DB; Kaine EM; Moore RH; Halpern EF; Hughes KS; Tanabe KK; Smith BL; Michaelson JS
    Cancer; 2004 Aug; 101(3):495-507. PubMed ID: 15274062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The age at which women begin mammographic screening.
    Colbert JA; Kaine EM; Bigby J; Smith DN; Moore RH; Rafferty E; Georgian-Smith D; Anne D'Alessandro H; Yeh E; Kopans DB; Halpern EF; Hughes K; Smith BL; Tanabe KK; Michaelson JS
    Cancer; 2004 Oct; 101(8):1850-9. PubMed ID: 15386333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Patterns and characteristics of repeat mammography among women 50 years and older.
    Ulcickas Yood M; McCarthy BD; Lee NC; Jacobsen G; Johnson CC
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 1999 Jul; 8(7):595-9. PubMed ID: 10428196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparing acculturation scales and their relationship to cancer screening among older Mexican-American women.
    Suarez L; Pulley L
    J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 1995; (18):41-7. PubMed ID: 8562221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Can Medicare billing claims data be used to assess mammography utilization among women ages 65 and older?
    Smith-Bindman R; Quale C; Chu PW; Rosenberg R; Kerlikowske K
    Med Care; 2006 May; 44(5):463-70. PubMed ID: 16641665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The pattern of breast cancer screening utilization and its consequences.
    Michaelson J; Satija S; Moore R; Weber G; Halpern E; Garland A; Puri D; Kopans DB
    Cancer; 2002 Jan; 94(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 11815958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program: report on the first 4 years of mammography provided to medically underserved women.
    May DS; Lee NC; Nadel MR; Henson RM; Miller DS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jan; 170(1):97-104. PubMed ID: 9423608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of a mailed intervention on annual mammography and physician breast examinations among women at high risk of breast cancer.
    Richardson JL; Mondrus GT; Danley K; Deapen D; Mack T
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 1996 Jan; 5(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 8770470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mammography screening and the increase in breast cancer incidence in Hawaii.
    Maskarinec G; Wilkens L; Meng L
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 1997 Mar; 6(3):201-8. PubMed ID: 9138664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Screening mammography use: the importance of a population perspective.
    McCarthy BD; Yood MU; MacWilliam CH; Lee MJ
    Am J Prev Med; 1996; 12(2):91-5. PubMed ID: 8777073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biennial versus annual mammography and the risk of late-stage breast cancer.
    White E; Miglioretti DL; Yankaskas BC; Geller BM; Rosenberg RD; Kerlikowske K; Saba L; Vacek PM; Carney PA; Buist DS; Oestreicher N; Barlow W; Ballard-Barbash R; Taplin SH
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Dec; 96(24):1832-9. PubMed ID: 15601639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effects of health beliefs on screening mammography utilization among a diverse sample of older women.
    Thomas LR; Fox SA; Leake BG; Roetzheim RG
    Women Health; 1996; 24(3):77-94. PubMed ID: 9046554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Trends in breast cancer by race and ethnicity: update 2006.
    Smigal C; Jemal A; Ward E; Cokkinides V; Smith R; Howe HL; Thun M
    CA Cancer J Clin; 2006; 56(3):168-83. PubMed ID: 16737949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Factors associated with the incompliance with mammogram screening among individuals with a family history of breast cancer or ovarian cancer.
    Wu H; Zhu K; Jatoi I; Shah M; Shriver CD; Potter J
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Mar; 101(3):317-24. PubMed ID: 16821080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Does utilization of screening mammography explain racial and ethnic differences in breast cancer?
    Smith-Bindman R; Miglioretti DL; Lurie N; Abraham L; Barbash RB; Strzelczyk J; Dignan M; Barlow WE; Beasley CM; Kerlikowske K
    Ann Intern Med; 2006 Apr; 144(8):541-53. PubMed ID: 16618951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Utilization of screening mammography in New Hampshire: a population-based assessment.
    Carney PA; Goodrich ME; Mackenzie T; Weiss JE; Poplack SP; Wells WS; Titus-Ernstoff L
    Cancer; 2005 Oct; 104(8):1726-32. PubMed ID: 16158386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The 2003 Australian Breast Health Survey: survey design and preliminary results.
    Villanueva EV; Jones S; Nehill C; Favelle S; Steel D; Iverson D; Zorbas H
    BMC Public Health; 2008 Jan; 8():13. PubMed ID: 18194528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of false-positive mammograms on interval breast cancer screening in a health maintenance organization.
    Burman ML; Taplin SH; Herta DF; Elmore JG
    Ann Intern Med; 1999 Jul; 131(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 10391809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Breast cancer screening in Florida. Opportunities for prevention.
    Hopkins RS; Hensley K
    J Fla Med Assoc; 1993 Mar; 80(3):178-80. PubMed ID: 8487025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Screening mammography: value in women 35-39 years old.
    Liberman L; Dershaw DD; Deutch BM; Thaler HT; Lippin BS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Jul; 161(1):53-6. PubMed ID: 8517320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 43.