These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15274131)

  • 1. Advances in the development of common interchange standards for proteomic data.
    Orchard S; Taylor CF; Hermjakob H; Weimin-Zhu ; Julian RK; Apweiler R
    Proteomics; 2004 Aug; 4(8):2363-5. PubMed ID: 15274131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Current status of proteomic standards development.
    Orchard S; Taylor C; Hermjakob H; Zhu W; Julian R; Apweiler R
    Expert Rev Proteomics; 2004 Aug; 1(2):179-83. PubMed ID: 15966812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The HUPO proteomics standards initiative--easing communication and minimizing data loss in a changing world.
    Orchard S; Hermjakob H
    Brief Bioinform; 2008 Mar; 9(2):166-73. PubMed ID: 18065433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Five years of progress in the Standardization of Proteomics Data 4th Annual Spring Workshop of the HUPO-Proteomics Standards Initiative April 23-25, 2007 Ecole Nationale Supérieure (ENS), Lyon, France.
    Orchard S; Montechi-Palazzi L; Deutsch EW; Binz PA; Jones AR; Paton N; Pizarro A; Creasy DM; Wojcik J; Hermjakob H
    Proteomics; 2007 Oct; 7(19):3436-40. PubMed ID: 17907277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Proteomic data exchange and storage: the need for common standards and public repositories.
    Orchard S; Jones P; Taylor C; Zhu W; Julian RK; Hermjakob H; Apweiler R
    Methods Mol Biol; 2007; 367():261-70. PubMed ID: 17185781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Further steps towards data standardisation: the Proteomic Standards Initiative HUPO 3(rd) annual congress, Beijing 25-27(th) October, 2004.
    Orchard S; Hermjakob H; Binz PA; Hoogland C; Taylor CF; Zhu W; Julian RK; Apweiler R
    Proteomics; 2005 Feb; 5(2):337-9. PubMed ID: 15700244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Do we want our data raw? Including binary mass spectrometry data in public proteomics data repositories.
    Martens L; Nesvizhskii AI; Hermjakob H; Adamski M; Omenn GS; Vandekerckhove J; Gevaert K
    Proteomics; 2005 Aug; 5(13):3501-5. PubMed ID: 16041670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Data standardization by the HUPO-PSI: how has the community benefitted?
    Orchard S; Hermjakob H
    Methods Mol Biol; 2011; 696():149-60. PubMed ID: 21063946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Annual spring meeting of the Proteomics Standards Initiative.
    Orchard S; Deutsch EW; Binz PA; Jones AR; Creasy D; Montechi-Palazzi L; Corthals G; Hermjakob H
    Proteomics; 2009 Oct; 9(19):4429-32. PubMed ID: 19670378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. New approaches towards integrated proteomic databases and depositories.
    Rohlff C
    Expert Rev Proteomics; 2004 Oct; 1(3):267-74. PubMed ID: 15966823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Advances in plant proteomics.
    Chen S; Harmon AC
    Proteomics; 2006 Oct; 6(20):5504-16. PubMed ID: 16972296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A bioinformatics perspective on proteomics: data storage, analysis, and integration.
    Kremer A; Schneider R; Terstappen GC
    Biosci Rep; 2005; 25(1-2):95-106. PubMed ID: 16222422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Data standards and controlled vocabularies for proteomics.
    Martens L; Palazzi LM; Hermjakob H
    Methods Mol Biol; 2008; 484():279-86. PubMed ID: 18592186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The HUPO proteomics standards initiative--overcoming the fragmentation of proteomics data.
    Hermjakob H
    Proteomics; 2006 Sep; 6 Suppl 2():34-8. PubMed ID: 17031794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Advanced nanoscale separations and mass spectrometry for sensitive high-throughput proteomics.
    Shen Y; Smith RD
    Expert Rev Proteomics; 2005 Jun; 2(3):431-47. PubMed ID: 16000088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Metabolomics Standards Workshop and the development of international standards for reporting metabolomics experimental results.
    Castle AL; Fiehn O; Kaddurah-Daouk R; Lindon JC
    Brief Bioinform; 2006 Jun; 7(2):159-65. PubMed ID: 16772263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Proteomics data exchange and storage: the need for common standards and public repositories.
    Jiménez RC; Vizcaíno JA
    Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 1007():317-33. PubMed ID: 23666733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Centralized data analysis of a large interlaboratory proteomics project: a feasibility study.
    Beer I; Barnea E; Admon A
    Proteomics; 2005 Aug; 5(13):3491-6. PubMed ID: 16052626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bioinformatics analysis of mass spectrometry-based proteomics data sets.
    Kumar C; Mann M
    FEBS Lett; 2009 Jun; 583(11):1703-12. PubMed ID: 19306877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Functional genomics and proteomics in the clinical neurosciences: data mining and bioinformatics.
    Phan JH; Quo CF; Wang MD
    Prog Brain Res; 2006; 158():83-108. PubMed ID: 17027692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.