These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15274750)

  • 1. Structural characterization of genomes by large scale sequence-structure threading: application of reliability analysis in structural genomics.
    Cherkasov A; Ho Sui SJ; Brunham RC; Jones SJ
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2004 Jul; 5():101. PubMed ID: 15274750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Structural characterization of genomes by large scale sequence-structure threading.
    Cherkasov A; Jones SJ
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2004 Apr; 5():37. PubMed ID: 15061866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Progress of structural genomics initiatives: an analysis of solved target structures.
    Todd AE; Marsden RL; Thornton JM; Orengo CA
    J Mol Biol; 2005 May; 348(5):1235-60. PubMed ID: 15854658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Genomic Threading Database: a comprehensive resource for structural annotations of the genomes from key organisms.
    McGuffin LJ; Street SA; Bryson K; Sørensen SA; Jones DT
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2004 Jan; 32(Database issue):D196-9. PubMed ID: 14681393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. PGSB/MIPS Plant Genome Information Resources and Concepts for the Analysis of Complex Grass Genomes.
    Spannagl M; Bader K; Pfeifer M; Nussbaumer T; Mayer KF
    Methods Mol Biol; 2016; 1374():165-86. PubMed ID: 26519405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Automatic detection of subsystem/pathway variants in genome analysis.
    Ye Y; Osterman A; Overbeek R; Godzik A
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Jun; 21 Suppl 1():i478-86. PubMed ID: 15961494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. GRAST: a new way of genome reduction analysis using comparative genomics.
    Toft C; Fares MA
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Jul; 22(13):1551-61. PubMed ID: 16601001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evolution of a microbial nitrilase gene family: a comparative and environmental genomics study.
    Podar M; Eads JR; Richardson TH
    BMC Evol Biol; 2005 Aug; 5():42. PubMed ID: 16083508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Protein family and fold occurrence in genomes: power-law behaviour and evolutionary model.
    Qian J; Luscombe NM; Gerstein M
    J Mol Biol; 2001 Nov; 313(4):673-81. PubMed ID: 11697896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Plant genome annotation methods.
    Ouyang S; Thibaud-Nissen F; Childs KL; Zhu W; Buell CR
    Methods Mol Biol; 2009; 513():263-82. PubMed ID: 19347655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic reconstruction from high-resolution whole-genome data and a tree of 68 eukaryotes.
    Lin Y; Hu F; Tang J; Moret BM
    Pac Symp Biocomput; 2013; ():285-96. PubMed ID: 23424133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Integrative database analysis in structural genomics.
    Gerstein M
    Nat Struct Biol; 2000 Nov; 7 Suppl():960-3. PubMed ID: 11104000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. C-terminal motif prediction in eukaryotic proteomes using comparative genomics and statistical over-representation across protein families.
    Austin RS; Provart NJ; Cutler SR
    BMC Genomics; 2007 Jun; 8():191. PubMed ID: 17594486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Structural genomics analysis: characteristics of atypical, common, and horizontally transferred folds.
    Hegyi H; Lin J; Greenbaum D; Gerstein M
    Proteins; 2002 May; 47(2):126-41. PubMed ID: 11933060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Improving the specificity of exon prediction using comparative genomics.
    Wu J
    BMC Genomics; 2008 Sep; 9 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S13. PubMed ID: 18831778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ensembl Plants: Integrating Tools for Visualizing, Mining, and Analyzing Plant Genomics Data.
    Bolser D; Staines DM; Pritchard E; Kersey P
    Methods Mol Biol; 2016; 1374():115-40. PubMed ID: 26519403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative chloroplast genomics: analyses including new sequences from the angiosperms Nuphar advena and Ranunculus macranthus.
    Raubeson LA; Peery R; Chumley TW; Dziubek C; Fourcade HM; Boore JL; Jansen RK
    BMC Genomics; 2007 Jun; 8():174. PubMed ID: 17573971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Molecular dynamics recipes for genome research.
    Biagini T; Chillemi G; Mazzoccoli G; Grottesi A; Fusilli C; Capocefalo D; Castellana S; Vescovi AL; Mazza T
    Brief Bioinform; 2018 Sep; 19(5):853-862. PubMed ID: 28334084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. u-Genome: a database on genome design in unicellular genomes.
    Sakharkar KR; Chaturvedi I; Chow VT; Kwoh CK; Kangueane P; Sakharkar MK
    In Silico Biol; 2005; 5(5-6):611-5. PubMed ID: 16610139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Gene fusions and gene duplications: relevance to genomic annotation and functional analysis.
    Serres MH; Riley M
    BMC Genomics; 2005 Mar; 6():33. PubMed ID: 15757509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.