185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15276671)
1. Response of the auditory nerve to sinusoidal electrical stimulation: effects of high-rate pulse trains.
Runge-Samuelson CL; Abbas PJ; Rubinstein JT; Miller CA; Robinson BK
Hear Res; 2004 Aug; 194(1-2):1-13. PubMed ID: 15276671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of temporal properties on compound action potentials in response to amplitude-modulated electric pulse trains in guinea pigs.
Jeng FC; Abbas PJ; Hu N; Miller CA; Nourski KV; Robinson BK
Hear Res; 2009 Jan; 247(1):47-59. PubMed ID: 19015019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Activity-dependent developmental plasticity of the auditory brain stem in children who use cochlear implants.
Gordon KA; Papsin BC; Harrison RV
Ear Hear; 2003 Dec; 24(6):485-500. PubMed ID: 14663348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of high-frequency electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in an animal model of cochlear implants.
Vischer M; Haenggeli A; Zhang J; Pelizzone M; Häusler R; Rouiller EM
Am J Otol; 1997 Nov; 18(6 Suppl):S27-9. PubMed ID: 9391586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Adaptation of the electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) recorded from nucleus CI24 cochlear implant users.
Clay KM; Brown CJ
Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):850-61. PubMed ID: 17982371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of acoustic noise on the auditory nerve compound action potentials evoked by electric pulse trains.
Nourski KV; Abbas PJ; Miller CA; Robinson BK; Jeng FC
Hear Res; 2005 Apr; 202(1-2):141-53. PubMed ID: 15811706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Predictions of psychophysical measurements for sinusoidal amplitude modulated (SAM) pulse-train stimuli from a stochastic model.
Xu Y; Collins LM
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 Aug; 54(8):1389-98. PubMed ID: 17694859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Neural response telemetry reconsidered: II. The influence of neural population on the ECAP recovery function and refractoriness.
Botros A; Psarros C
Ear Hear; 2010 Jun; 31(3):380-91. PubMed ID: 20090532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Practical model description of peripheral neural excitation in cochlear implant recipients: 1. Growth of loudness and ECAP amplitude with current.
Cohen LT
Hear Res; 2009 Jan; 247(2):87-99. PubMed ID: 19063956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The relation between auditory-nerve temporal responses and perceptual rate integration in cochlear implants.
Hughes ML; Baudhuin JL; Goehring JL
Hear Res; 2014 Oct; 316():44-56. PubMed ID: 25093283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparisons between neural response imaging thresholds, electrically evoked auditory reflex thresholds and most comfortable loudness levels in CII bionic ear users with HiResolution sound processing strategies.
Han DM; Chen XQ; Zhao XT; Kong Y; Li YX; Liu S; Liu B; Mo LY
Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jul; 125(7):732-5. PubMed ID: 16012035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of stimulus level on the temporal response properties of the auditory nerve in cochlear implants.
Hughes ML; Laurello SA
Hear Res; 2017 Aug; 351():116-129. PubMed ID: 28633960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Predicting dynamic range and intensity discrimination for electrical pulse-train stimuli using a stochastic auditory nerve model: the effects of stimulus noise.
Xu Y; Collins LM
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Jun; 52(6):1040-9. PubMed ID: 15977734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparing neural response telemetry amplitude growth functions with loudness growth functions: preliminary results.
Lai WK; Dillier N
Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2 Suppl):42S-45S. PubMed ID: 17496644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An introduction to the biophysics of the electrically evoked compound action potential.
Rubinstein JT
Int J Audiol; 2004 Dec; 43 Suppl 1():S3-9. PubMed ID: 15732375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effects of interpulse interval on stochastic properties of electrical stimulation: models and measurements.
Matsuoka AJ; Rubinstein JT; Abbas PJ; Miller CA
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2001 Apr; 48(4):416-24. PubMed ID: 11322529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of inter-phase gap on the sensitivity of cochlear implant users to electrical stimulation.
Carlyon RP; van Wieringen A; Deeks JM; Long CJ; Lyzenga J; Wouters J
Hear Res; 2005 Jul; 205(1-2):210-24. PubMed ID: 15953530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The clinical application of potentials evoked from the peripheral auditory system.
Miller CA; Brown CJ; Abbas PJ; Chi SL
Hear Res; 2008 Aug; 242(1-2):184-97. PubMed ID: 18515023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Stimulus level effects on neural excitation and eCAP amplitude.
Westen AA; Dekker DM; Briaire JJ; Frijns JH
Hear Res; 2011 Oct; 280(1-2):166-76. PubMed ID: 21664959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Recovery characteristics of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve in deafened guinea pigs: relation to neuronal status.
Ramekers D; Versnel H; Strahl SB; Klis SF; Grolman W
Hear Res; 2015 Mar; 321():12-24. PubMed ID: 25582354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
