These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1527746)

  • 1. Radiographic appearance of titanium alloy prefabricated posts cemented with different luting materials.
    Goss JM; Wright WJ; Bowles WF
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 May; 67(5):632-7. PubMed ID: 1527746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Retention strengths of five luting cements on prefabricated dowels after root canal obturation with a zinc oxide/eugenol sealer: 1. Dowel space preparation/cementation at one week after obturation.
    Hagge MS; Wong RD; Lindemuth JS
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Sep; 11(3):168-75. PubMed ID: 12237797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of post length and type of luting agent on the dislodging time of metallic prefabricated posts by using ultrasonic vibration.
    Ebrahimi Dastgurdi M; Khabiri M; Khademi A; Zare Jahromi M; Hosseini Dastnaei P
    J Endod; 2013 Nov; 39(11):1423-7. PubMed ID: 24139266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fracture resistance of incisor teeth restored using fibre-reinforced posts and threaded metal posts: effect of post length, location, pretreatment and cementation of the final restoration.
    Schmitter M; Lippenberger S; Rues S; Gilde H; Rammelsberg P
    Int Endod J; 2010 May; 43(5):436-42. PubMed ID: 20518938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tensile bond strength of cast commercially pure titanium and cast gold-alloy posts and cores cemented with two luting agents.
    Menani LR; Ribeiro RF; Antunes RP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):141-7. PubMed ID: 18262015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Retention of parallel-sided titanium posts cemented with six luting agents: an in vitro study.
    Duncan JP; Pameijer CH
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Oct; 80(4):423-8. PubMed ID: 9791788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of ultrasonic vibration and various sealer and cement combinations on titanium post removal.
    Bergeron BE; Murchison DF; Schindler WG; Walker WA
    J Endod; 2001 Jan; 27(1):13-7. PubMed ID: 11487157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Push-out bond strengths of different dental cements used to cement glass fiber posts.
    Pereira JR; Lins do Valle A; Ghizoni JS; Lorenzoni FC; Ramos MB; Dos Reis Só MV
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Aug; 110(2):134-40. PubMed ID: 23929375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Survival rate and fracture strength of endodontically treated maxillary incisors with moderate defects restored with different post-and-core systems: an in vitro study.
    Butz F; Lennon AM; Heydecke G; Strub JR
    Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(1):58-64. PubMed ID: 11842907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effects of post-core and crown material and luting agents on stress distribution in tooth restorations.
    Oyar P
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):211-9. PubMed ID: 24560984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of post adaptation in the root canal on retention of posts cemented with various cements.
    Chan FW; Harcourt JK; Brockhurst PJ
    Aust Dent J; 1993 Feb; 38(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 8447770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Retention of posts with resin, glass ionomer and hybrid cements.
    Love RM; Purton DG
    J Dent; 1998 Sep; 26(7):599-602. PubMed ID: 9754749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of surface treatment of titanium posts on the tensile bond strength.
    Schmage P; Sohn J; Ozcan M; Nergiz I
    Dent Mater; 2006 Feb; 22(2):189-94. PubMed ID: 16039707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with glass fiber reinforced posts and cast gold post and cores cemented with three cements.
    Torres-Sánchez C; Montoya-Salazar V; Córdoba P; Vélez C; Guzmán-Duran A; Gutierrez-Pérez JL; Torres-Lagares D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Aug; 110(2):127-33. PubMed ID: 23929374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Retentive strength, disintegration, and marginal quality of luting cements.
    Gorodovsky S; Zidan O
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Aug; 68(2):269-74. PubMed ID: 1501173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Retentive strength of metal copings on prefabricated abutments with five different cements.
    Maeyama H; Sawase T; Jimbo R; Kamada K; Suketa N; Fukui J; Atsuta M
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2005; 7(4):229-34. PubMed ID: 16336914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of titanium dowel retention using four different luting agents.
    Balbosh A; Ludwig K; Kern M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Sep; 94(3):227-33. PubMed ID: 16126075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An in vitro study of coronal microleakage in endodontically-treated teeth restored with posts.
    Ravanshad S; Ghoreeshi N
    Aust Endod J; 2003 Dec; 29(3):128-33. PubMed ID: 14700397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bonding of restorative materials to dentin with various luting agents.
    Peutzfeldt A; Sahafi A; Flury S
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(3):266-73. PubMed ID: 21740244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Retention of posts cemented with various dentinal bonding cements.
    Mendoza DB; Eakle WS
    J Prosthet Dent; 1994 Dec; 72(6):591-4. PubMed ID: 7853255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.