240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15278842)
1. The evolution of female preferences for multiple indicators of quality.
van Doorn GS; Weissing FJ
Am Nat; 2004 Aug; 164(2):173-86. PubMed ID: 15278842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sexual conflict and the evolution of female preferences for indicators of male quality.
van Doorn GS; Weissing FJ
Am Nat; 2006 Dec; 168(6):742-57. PubMed ID: 17109317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sexual selection and condition-dependent mate preferences.
Cotton S; Small J; Pomiankowski A
Curr Biol; 2006 Sep; 16(17):R755-65. PubMed ID: 16950102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Testing the genetics underlying the co-evolution of mate choice and ornament in the wild.
Qvarnström A; Brommer JE; Gustafsson L
Nature; 2006 May; 441(7089):84-6. PubMed ID: 16672970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Male versus female mate choice: sexual selection and the evolution of species recognition via reinforcement.
Servedio MR
Evolution; 2007 Dec; 61(12):2772-89. PubMed ID: 17924955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mate choice evolution, dominance effects, and the maintenance of genetic variation.
Lehmann L; Keller LF; Kokko H
J Theor Biol; 2007 Jan; 244(2):282-95. PubMed ID: 16979189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evolution of mate-choice imprinting: competing strategies.
Tramm NA; Servedio MR
Evolution; 2008 Aug; 62(8):1991-2003. PubMed ID: 18485111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Female swallow preference for symmetrical male sexual ornaments.
Møller AP
Nature; 1992 May; 357(6375):238-40. PubMed ID: 1589021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Can non-directional male mating preferences facilitate honest female ornamentation?
Chenoweth SF; Doughty P; Kokko H
Ecol Lett; 2006 Feb; 9(2):179-84. PubMed ID: 16958883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Genetic quality and sexual selection: an integrated framework for good genes and compatible genes.
Neff BD; Pitcher TE
Mol Ecol; 2005 Jan; 14(1):19-38. PubMed ID: 15643948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The evolution of mating preferences for genetic attractiveness and quality in the presence of sensory bias.
Henshaw JM; Fromhage L; Jones AG
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2022 Aug; 119(33):e2206262119. PubMed ID: 35939704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sexual selection, multiple male ornaments, and age- and condition-dependent signaling in the common yellowthroat.
Freeman-Gallant CR; Taff CC; Morin DF; Dunn PO; Whittingham LA; Tsang SM
Evolution; 2010 Apr; 64(4):1007-17. PubMed ID: 19863585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evidence that sensory traps can evolve into honest signals.
Garcia CM; Ramirez E
Nature; 2005 Mar; 434(7032):501-5. PubMed ID: 15791255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sensory bias as an explanation for the evolution of mate preferences.
Fuller RC; Houle D; Travis J
Am Nat; 2005 Oct; 166(4):437-46. PubMed ID: 16224700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ornament evolution in dragon lizards: multiple gains and widespread losses reveal a complex history of evolutionary change.
Ord TJ; Stuart-Fox D
J Evol Biol; 2006 May; 19(3):797-808. PubMed ID: 16674576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Adaptive plasticity in female mate choice dampens sexual selection on male ornaments in the lark bunting.
Chaine AS; Lyon BE
Science; 2008 Jan; 319(5862):459-62. PubMed ID: 18218896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Long-term persistence of exaggerated ornaments under Fisherian runaway despite costly mate search.
Waffender A; Henshaw JM
J Evol Biol; 2023 Jan; 36(1):45-56. PubMed ID: 36514848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Male quality, signal reliability and female choice: assessing the expectations of inter-sexual selection.
McLean MJ; Bishop PJ; Nakagawa S
J Evol Biol; 2012 Aug; 25(8):1513-20. PubMed ID: 22591267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Song function and the evolution of female preferences: why birds sing, why brains matter.
Nowicki S; Searcy WA
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2004 Jun; 1016():704-23. PubMed ID: 15313801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. No fecundity cost of female secondary sexual trait expression in the horned beetle Onthophagus sagittarius.
Simmons LW; Emlen DJ
J Evol Biol; 2008 Sep; 21(5):1227-35. PubMed ID: 18631210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
