231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15279942)
1. Quantitative and qualitative comparison of density-based purification methods for detection of Cryptosporidium oocysts in turbid environmental matrices.
Chesnot T; Schwartzbrod J
J Microbiol Methods; 2004 Sep; 58(3):375-86. PubMed ID: 15279942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantitative and qualitative comparisons of Cryptosporidium faecal purification procedures for the isolation of oocysts suitable for proteomic analysis.
Truong Q; Ferrari BC
Int J Parasitol; 2006 Jun; 36(7):811-9. PubMed ID: 16696982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of Cryptosporidium parvum oocyst recovery efficiencies from various filtration cartridges by electrochemiluminescence assays.
Lee Y; Gomez LL; McAuliffe IT; Tsang VC
Lett Appl Microbiol; 2004; 39(2):156-62. PubMed ID: 15242454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Recovery and detection of Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts from water samples using continuous flow centrifugation.
Higgins JA; Trout JM; Fayer R; Shelton D; Jenkins MC
Water Res; 2003 Sep; 37(15):3551-60. PubMed ID: 12867321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Improvement of recoveries for the determination of protozoa Cryptosporidium and Giardia in water using method 1623.
Hu J; Feng Y; Ong SL; Ng WJ; Song L; Tan X; Chu X
J Microbiol Methods; 2004 Sep; 58(3):321-5. PubMed ID: 15279936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Efficacy of the solar water disinfection method in turbid waters experimentally contaminated with Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts under real field conditions.
Gómez-Couso H; Fontán-Saínz M; Sichel C; Fernández-Ibáñez P; Ares-Mazás E
Trop Med Int Health; 2009 Jun; 14(6):620-7. PubMed ID: 19570059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Methods for the recovery, isolation and detection of Cryptosporidium oocysts in wastewaters.
McCuin RM; Clancy JL
J Microbiol Methods; 2005 Oct; 63(1):73-88. PubMed ID: 15893393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Detection of Cryptosporidium parvum in secondary effluents using a most probable number-polymerase chain reaction assay.
Tsuchihashi R; Loge FJ; Darby JL
Water Environ Res; 2003; 75(4):292-9. PubMed ID: 12934822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Detection and discrimination of Cryptosporidium parvum and C. hominis in water samples by immunomagnetic separation-PCR.
Ochiai Y; Takada C; Hosaka M
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2005 Feb; 71(2):898-903. PubMed ID: 15691946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of methods for improved detection of Cryptosporidium spp. in mussels (Mytilus californianus).
Miller WA; Gardner IA; Atwill ER; Leutenegger CM; Miller MA; Hedrick RP; Melli AC; Barnes NM; Conrad PA
J Microbiol Methods; 2006 Jun; 65(3):367-79. PubMed ID: 16181691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Development of procedures for direct extraction of Cryptosporidium DNA from water concentrates and for relief of PCR inhibitors.
Jiang J; Alderisio KA; Singh A; Xiao L
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2005 Mar; 71(3):1135-41. PubMed ID: 15746310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quantitative comparison of different purification and detection methods for Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts.
Kar S; Gawlowska S; Daugschies A; Bangoura B
Vet Parasitol; 2011 May; 177(3-4):366-70. PubMed ID: 21242035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Performances of the immunomagnetic separation method for Cryptosporidium in water under various operation conditions.
Hsu BM; Huang C
Biotechnol Prog; 2001; 17(6):1114-8. PubMed ID: 11735449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Study on methods for isolation and purification of Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts from mouse feces].
Chen F; Huang KH
Zhongguo Ji Sheng Chong Xue Yu Ji Sheng Chong Bing Za Zhi; 2006 Jun; 24(3):219-22. PubMed ID: 17094628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Improvement of amplification method for Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts from mice].
Huang KH; Yang SG; Tang JX
Zhongguo Ji Sheng Chong Xue Yu Ji Sheng Chong Bing Za Zhi; 2001; 19(6):360-2. PubMed ID: 12572074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of most probable number-PCR and most probable number-foci detection method for quantifying infectious Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts in environmental samples.
Carey CM; Lee H; Trevors JT
J Microbiol Methods; 2006 Nov; 67(2):363-72. PubMed ID: 16730821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An immunomagnetic separation-real-time PCR method for quantification of Cryptosporidium parvum in water samples.
Fontaine M; Guillot E
J Microbiol Methods; 2003 Jul; 54(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 12732419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. New method using sedimentation and immunomagnetic separation for isolation and enumeration of Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts and Giardia lamblia cysts.
Massanet-Nicolau J
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2003 Nov; 69(11):6758-61. PubMed ID: 14602637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Association of Cryptosporidium parvum with suspended particles: impact on oocyst sedimentation.
Searcy KE; Packman AI; Atwill ER; Harter T
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2005 Feb; 71(2):1072-8. PubMed ID: 15691968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Occurrence of Cryptosporidium spp. oocysts in raw and treated sewage and river water in north-eastern Spain.
Montemayor M; Valero F; Jofre J; Lucena F
J Appl Microbiol; 2005; 99(6):1455-62. PubMed ID: 16313418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
