These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15281189)

  • 1. Risk standards for pediatric research: rethinking the Grimes ruling.
    Wendler D
    Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 2004 Jun; 14(2):187-98. PubMed ID: 15281189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Group benefit and protection of pediatric research subjects: Grimes v. Kennedy Krieger and the Lead Abatement Study.
    Kopelman LM
    Account Res; 2002; 9(3-4):177-92. PubMed ID: 12816126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Grimes v. Kennedy Krieger Institute, Inc.
    Maryland Court of Appeals
    Wests Atl Report; 2001; 782():807-62. PubMed ID: 15765579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Parental consent for children's participation in biomedical research: the ethical, regulatory, and judicial framework of Grimes v. Kennedy Krieger Institute, Inc.
    Thiel KS
    J Health Care Law Policy; 2002; 6(1):169-93. PubMed ID: 15017956
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pediatric research regulations under legal scrutiny: Grimes narrows their interpretation.
    Kopelman LM
    J Law Med Ethics; 2002; 30(1):38-49. PubMed ID: 11905267
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ethically questionable research with children: the Kennedy Krieger Lead Abatement Study.
    Shamoo AE
    Account Res; 2002; 9(3-4):167-75. PubMed ID: 12816125
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Kennedy Krieger case: judicial anger and the research enterprise.
    Schwartz J
    J Health Care Law Policy; 2002; 6(1):148-68. PubMed ID: 15017955
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quantifying the federal minimal risk standard: implications for pediatric research without a prospect of direct benefit.
    Wendler D; Belsky L; Thompson KM; Emanuel EJ
    JAMA; 2005 Aug; 294(7):826-32. PubMed ID: 16106008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Risk and responsibility: ethics, Grimes v Kennedy Krieger, and public health research involving children.
    Mastroianni AC; Kahn JP
    Am J Public Health; 2002 Jul; 92(7):1073-6. PubMed ID: 12084682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pediatric research and the federal minimal risk standard.
    Ross LF; Nelson RM
    JAMA; 2006 Feb; 295(7):759; author reply 759-60. PubMed ID: 16478898
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Whose duty is it anyway?: the Kennedy Krieger opinion and its implications for public health research.
    Hoffmann DE; Rothenberg KH
    J Health Care Law Policy; 2002; 6(1):109-47. PubMed ID: 15017954
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Children as subjects in nontherapeutic research. Grimes v. Kennedy Krieger Institute, Inc.
    Pearce M
    J Leg Med; 2002 Sep; 23(3):421-36. PubMed ID: 12230814
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The lead-based paint abatement repair and maintenance study in Baltimore: historic framework and study design.
    Pollak J
    J Health Care Law Policy; 2002; 6(1):89-108. PubMed ID: 15017953
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Appropriate risk exposure in environmental health research. The Kennedy-Krieger lead abatement study.
    Nelson RM
    Neurotoxicol Teratol; 2002; 24(4):445-9. PubMed ID: 12127884
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Why we need legal standards for pediatric research.
    Wendler D; Forster H
    J Pediatr; 2004 Feb; 144(2):150-3. PubMed ID: 14760251
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Nontherapeutic research, minimal risk, and the Kennedy Krieger lead abatement study.
    Nelson RM
    IRB; 2001; 23(6):7-11. PubMed ID: 12737175
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Nontherapeutic research with children: Grimes v Kennedy Krieger Institute.
    Glantz LH
    Am J Public Health; 2002 Jul; 92(7):1070-3. PubMed ID: 12084681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In defense of the Hopkins Lead Abatement Studies.
    Ross LF
    J Law Med Ethics; 2002; 30(1):50-7. PubMed ID: 11905268
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. U.S. investigating Johns Hopkins study of lead paint hazard.
    Lewin T
    N Y Times Web; 2001 Aug; ():A11. PubMed ID: 12155620
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Medical studies and the average American kid.
    Weiss R
    Washington Post; 2005 Aug; ():A5. PubMed ID: 16138447
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.