These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15281416)

  • 1. Commentary: "Countertransference" on trial--witness or defendant?
    Sledge WH
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2004; 32(2):155-7. PubMed ID: 15281416
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Countertransference on the witness stand: a flight from self?
    Schetky DH; Colbach EM
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1982; 10(2):115-21. PubMed ID: 7171842
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Countering countertransference, II: beyond evaluation to cross-examination.
    Sattar SP; Pinals DA; Gutheil TG
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2004; 32(2):148-54. PubMed ID: 15281415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Battered women who kill: the impact of expert testimony and empathy induction in the courtroom.
    Plumm KM; Terrance CA
    Violence Against Women; 2009 Feb; 15(2):186-205. PubMed ID: 19126834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The psychiatric expert witness in the criminal justice system.
    Mullen PE
    Crim Behav Ment Health; 2010 Jul; 20(3):165-76. PubMed ID: 20549780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Qualification of persons taking part in psychiatric opinion-giving in a penal trial].
    Zgryzek K
    Psychiatr Pol; 1998; 32(4):397-403. PubMed ID: 9816897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The problem of evasive testimony: the expert "waffle".
    Gutheil TG
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2007; 35(1):112-7. PubMed ID: 17389354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Expertise in the context of criminal law].
    Vermylen Y
    Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 2005; 60(3):254-62. PubMed ID: 16370441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Process-related and criminalistic problems of forensic medicine experts in criminal offenses].
    Geerds F
    Arch Kriminol; 1987; 179(1-2):1-12. PubMed ID: 3566418
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Psychiatric testimony and the "reasonable person" standard.
    Weiss KJ
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1999; 27(4):580-9. PubMed ID: 10638785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Legal problems of forensic psychiatric expertise and of the compulsory treatment of psychiatric patients who have committed socially dangerous acts].
    Ulitskiĭ SIa
    Sud Med Ekspert; 1980; 23(1):47-9. PubMed ID: 6444470
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Law and psychiatry: a stormy marriage.
    Bromberg W
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1981; 9(3):172-9. PubMed ID: 7326442
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The whole truth versus the admissible truth.
    Gutheil TG; Hauser M; Spruiell G; White MS; Strasburger LH
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2004; 32(3):340. PubMed ID: 15515925
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The presentation of forensic psychiatric evidence in court.
    Gutheil TG
    Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci; 2000; 37(2):137-44. PubMed ID: 10994298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Expert witness and expert testimony in New Slovak Criminal Procedure Code].
    Kovác P
    Soud Lek; 2006 Apr; 51(2):22-6. PubMed ID: 16715644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Commentary: expert testimony as a potential asset in defense of capital sentencing cases.
    Edersheim JG; Beck JC
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2005; 33(4):519-22. PubMed ID: 16394229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The role of the forensic expert in criminal procedures according to Belgian Law.
    Vermylen Y
    Forensic Sci Int; 2010 Sep; 201(1-3):8-13. PubMed ID: 20471763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. "Reasonable medical certainty": can we meet Daubert standards in insanity cases?
    Poythress NG
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2004; 32(3):228-30. PubMed ID: 15515909
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [New tasks facing experts in psychology in dealing with forensic psychiatry (personal experiences)].
    Kaflik I; Nanys A
    Psychiatr Pol; 1980; 14(4):389-94. PubMed ID: 7443888
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Expert testimony in capital sentencing: juror responses.
    Montgomery JH; Ciccone JR; Garvey SP; Eisenberg T
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2005; 33(4):509-18. PubMed ID: 16394228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.