These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15281573)

  • 1. [Attitudes toward and experiences with clinical research among current and potential research subjects].
    Madsen SM
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2004 Jun; 166(24):2343-4. PubMed ID: 15281573
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The basics of human subjects protection.
    Yoder LH
    Medsurg Nurs; 2006 Apr; 15(2):95-8; quiz 99. PubMed ID: 16700248
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Understanding the decisions of cancer clinical trial participants to enter research studies: factors associated with informed consent, patient satisfaction, and decisional regret.
    Stryker JE; Wray RJ; Emmons KM; Winer E; Demetri G
    Patient Educ Couns; 2006 Oct; 63(1-2):104-9. PubMed ID: 16242898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Case study: research subject says institutional review board (IRB) would not answer her questions.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2006 Feb; 21(2):7. PubMed ID: 16789309
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Measuring cancer clinical trial understanding.
    Miller JD; Kotowski MR; Comis RL; Smith SW; Silk KJ; Colaizzi DD; Kimmel LG
    Health Commun; 2011 Jan; 26(1):82-93. PubMed ID: 21218302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The problem with optimism in clinical trials.
    Jansen LA
    IRB; 2006; 28(4):13-9. PubMed ID: 17036434
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Study design attributes influenced patients' willingness to participate in clinical research: a randomized vignette-based study.
    Agoritsas T; Deom M; Perneger TV
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Jan; 64(1):107-15. PubMed ID: 20558036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Respondent burden in clinical research: when are we asking too much of subjects?
    Ulrich CM; Wallen GR; Feister A; Grady C
    IRB; 2005; 27(4):17-20. PubMed ID: 16220630
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Research ethics and revised law regarding the Danish Central Scientific Ethical Committee].
    Kamper-Jørgensen F
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2004 Jun; 166(24):2337-40. PubMed ID: 15281571
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Identifying motivations and barriers to patient participation in clinical trials.
    Jones JM; Nyhof-Young J; Moric J; Friedman A; Wells W; Catton P
    J Cancer Educ; 2006; 21(4):237-42. PubMed ID: 17542716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reversing "research exceptionalism".
    Hansson SO
    Am J Bioeth; 2010 Aug; 10(8):66-7. PubMed ID: 20694917
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The experiences of children enrolled in pediatric oncology research: implications for assent.
    Unguru Y; Sill AM; Kamani N
    Pediatrics; 2010 Apr; 125(4):e876-83. PubMed ID: 20351001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Risking the rewards of regulation.
    Schwab AP
    Am J Bioeth; 2008 Nov; 8(11):9-10. PubMed ID: 19061096
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing the case for the regulation of research.
    Wilkinson T
    Am J Bioeth; 2010 Aug; 10(8):63-5. PubMed ID: 20694915
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Research involving children: regulations, review boards and reform.
    Gandhi R
    J Health Care Law Policy; 2005; 8(2):264-330. PubMed ID: 16471026
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [The system of scientific ethical committees].
    Larsen NA
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2003 Jun; 165(23):2412-3. PubMed ID: 12841005
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [The psychosocial approach to the planning and implementation of vaccine trials for HIV infection].
    Starace F; Embrione F; Fusco ML; Cafaro L
    Ann Ist Super Sanita; 2003; 39(2):259-66. PubMed ID: 14587226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. "You may have already won..": an examination of the use of lottery payments in research.
    Brown JS; Schonfeld TL; Gordon BG
    IRB; 2006; 28(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 16680874
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dermatology: obtaining a patient consent in clinical trials.
    Dimond B
    Br J Nurs; 2006 May 11-24; 15(9):500-1. PubMed ID: 16723924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Case study: institutional review board (IRB) did not know about subject problem until after study.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2006 May; 21(5):6-7. PubMed ID: 16832916
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.