These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15281672)

  • 1. A comparison between two systems for pre-employment medical assessment in the Royal Netherlands Army by a randomized, controlled study.
    de Raad J; Redekop WK
    Mil Med; 2004 Jun; 169(6):437-43. PubMed ID: 15281672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Analysis of health factors as predictors for the functioning of military personnel: study of the factors that predict fitness for duty and medical costs of soldiers of the Royal Netherlands Army.
    de Raad J; Redekop WK
    Mil Med; 2005 Jan; 170(1):14-20. PubMed ID: 15724848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Difference in fitness for duty among soldiers on a mission: can these be explained by a difference in the preemployment assessment?
    de Raad J; Nijhuis FJ; Willems JH
    Mil Med; 2005 Sep; 170(9):728-34. PubMed ID: 16261974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Benefits of a musculoskeletal screening examination for initial entry training soldiers.
    Petersen EJ; Smith KC
    Mil Med; 2007 Jan; 172(1):92-7. PubMed ID: 17274275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of a Novel Field Expedient Musculoskeletal Readiness Screening Tool in an Army Basic Training Population.
    Hearn D; Rhon D; Goss D; Thelen M
    Mil Med; 2017 Jul; 182(7):e1862-e1868. PubMed ID: 28810983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reliability of a Novel Return to Duty Screening Tool for Military Clinicians.
    Thelen MD; Koppenhaver SL; Hoppes CW; Shutt C; Musen JL; Williams MK
    US Army Med Dep J; 2015; ():14-23. PubMed ID: 26606404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [The range of cooperation between psychiatrist and psychologist during the medical-military certification].
    Florkowski A; Gruszczyński W; Gałecki P; Zboralski K
    Pol Merkur Lekarski; 2008; 25 Suppl 1():59-60. PubMed ID: 19025055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The value of a general practitioner completed pre-employment medical questionnaire in recruit selection.
    Owen JP
    J R Army Med Corps; 1994 Feb; 140(1):13-7. PubMed ID: 8904497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Attrition of U.S. military enlistees with waivers for hearing deficiency, 1995-2004.
    Niebuhr DW; Li Y; Powers TE; Krauss MR; Chandler D; Helfer T
    Mil Med; 2007 Jan; 172(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 17274269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effectiveness of a screening tool to detect injuries during Army Health Care Specialist training.
    Berg Rice VJ; Connolly VL; Pritchard A; Bergeron A; Mays MZ
    Work; 2007; 29(3):177-88. PubMed ID: 17942989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An audit of Territorial Army Medical Grades on presentation for mobilisation and full time reserve service at RTMC Chilwell.
    Wright LJ; Owen JP
    J R Army Med Corps; 2002 Sep; 148(3):262-5. PubMed ID: 12469428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Post-deployment screening for mental disorders and tailored advice about help-seeking in the UK military: a cluster randomised controlled trial.
    Rona RJ; Burdett H; Khondoker M; Chesnokov M; Green K; Pernet D; Jones N; Greenberg N; Wessely S; Fear NT
    Lancet; 2017 Apr; 389(10077):1410-1423. PubMed ID: 28215661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Asthma in the Army: 1985-1996.
    Wilson DR
    J R Army Med Corps; 1999 Feb; 145(1):23-5. PubMed ID: 10216844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A practical approach to problems on return from deployment.
    World MJ
    J R Army Med Corps; 2001 Jun; 147(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 11464402
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. What Risk Factors Are Associated With Musculoskeletal Injury in US Army Rangers? A Prospective Prognostic Study.
    Teyhen DS; Shaffer SW; Butler RJ; Goffar SL; Kiesel KB; Rhon DI; Williamson JN; Plisky PJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Sep; 473(9):2948-58. PubMed ID: 26013150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of nondeployable hearing profiles by Army component (Active Duty, National Guard, and Reserve) and by gender.
    Gibbs SG; Sobieraj J; Harris MD; Steele H; Tarwater PM; Ortiz M
    Mil Med; 2006 Oct; 171(10):967-9. PubMed ID: 17076448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Personality Assessment Questionnaire as a pre-accession screen for risk of mental disorders and early attrition in U. S. Army recruits.
    Niebuhr DW; Gubata ME; Oetting AA; Weber NS; Feng X; Cowan DN
    Psychol Serv; 2013 Nov; 10(4):378-85. PubMed ID: 23855422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Is the British Army medical grading functional assessment tool effective?
    Mackie I
    J R Army Med Corps; 2015 Dec; 161 Suppl 1():i23-i25. PubMed ID: 26621810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Prophylactic medical examination of state frontier military personnel of Ukraine: state and perspective of the development].
    Mehed' VP
    Lik Sprava; 2008; (7-8):90-4. PubMed ID: 19663024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Further development of prophylactic medical examination of military personnel in Ukraine].
    Bibik TA; Moroz HZ
    Lik Sprava; 2007; (5-6):125-8. PubMed ID: 18416176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.