These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15281718)

  • 61. IRB opts for "user friendly" letter rather than an informed consent form.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2005 Jan; 20(1):6-7. PubMed ID: 15810183
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Ethical review of interpretive research: problems and solutions.
    Jacobson N; Gewurtz R; Haydon E
    IRB; 2007; 29(5):1-8. PubMed ID: 17969777
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Informed consent in otolaryngology research.
    Thibeault SL; Benninger M
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2005 Nov; 133(5):651-3. PubMed ID: 16274787
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Maryland Court ruling sets precedent on research involving minors. Grimes v. Kennedy Krieger Institute, Inc.
    Roeder KH; Martin SH; Rees JS
    GHA Today; 2001 Oct; 45(9):3, 8. PubMed ID: 11715756
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Achieving proper balance in research with decisionally-incapacitated subjects: NAMI's perspectives on the working group's proposal.
    Flynn LM; Honberg RS
    J Health Care Law Policy; 1998; 1(1):174-92. PubMed ID: 15573436
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Response to F.G. Miller and J.D. Moreno, "the state of research ethics: a tribute to John C. Fletcher".
    Evans HM
    J Clin Ethics; 2005; 16(4):372-5; discussion 376-9. PubMed ID: 16447526
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Science academies blast US government's planned research-ethics reforms.
    Reardon S
    Nature; 2016 Jul; 535(7610):18. PubMed ID: 27383964
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Deferred consent in emergency intensive care research: what if the patient dies early? Use the data or not?
    Jansen TC; Kompanje EJO; Druml C; Menon DK; Wiedermann CJ; Bakker J
    Intensive Care Med; 2007 May; 33(5):894-900. PubMed ID: 17342513
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Problems with the ethics of medical research.
    Kerr-Wilson R
    Br J Hosp Med; 1994 Nov 16-Dec 13; 52(10):495-6. PubMed ID: 7858797
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. An experiment in saving lives: emergency patients unwittingly get artificial blood.
    Stein R
    Washington Post; 2004 Mar; ():A1, A8. PubMed ID: 15250093
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Bodies of evidence.
    Fedarko K
    Time; 1993 Dec; 142(24):70. PubMed ID: 11659678
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Right of the living dead? Consent to experimental surgery in the event of cortical death.
    Sparrow R
    J Med Ethics; 2006 Oct; 32(10):601-5. PubMed ID: 17012503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Is It Ethical to Enroll Cognitively Impaired Adults in Research That Is More Than Minimal Risk With No Prospect of Benefit?
    Taylor HA; Kuwana E; Wilfond BS
    Am J Bioeth; 2015; 15(10):64-5. PubMed ID: 26479112
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Fetal experimentation. 1975.
    North Dakota
    N D Century Code N D; 1975; Title 14 Chapter 14-02.2():. PubMed ID: 12041371
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Surrogate consent for live organ donation.
    Bramstedt KA
    JAMA; 2004 May; 291(17):2077-8; author reply 2078. PubMed ID: 15126433
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Protecting the uninsured human research subject.
    Vasgird DR; Hensleigh M; Berkman A; Schachne E; Trinh C
    J Public Health Manag Pract; 2000 Nov; 6(6):37-47. PubMed ID: 18019959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Policy Statement of the American Board of Professional Neuropsychology regarding Third Party Observation and the recording of psychological test administration in neuropsychological evaluations.
    Lewandowski A; Baker WJ; Sewick B; Knippa J; Axelrod B; McCaffrey RJ
    Appl Neuropsychol Adult; 2016; 23(6):391-8. PubMed ID: 27573487
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Regulators drop controversial biospecimen consent proposal.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2017 Jan; 355(6323):335. PubMed ID: 28126763
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. What do revised U.S. rules mean for human research?
    Nichols L; Brako L; Rivera SM; Tahmassian A; Jones MF; Pierce HH; Bierer BE
    Science; 2017 Aug; 357(6352):650-651. PubMed ID: 28818933
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Exposing unethical human research.
    Spiro HM
    Ann Intern Med; 2012 May; 156(10):754. PubMed ID: 22586016
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.