These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15282929)

  • 1. Ethics committees in Asia.
    de Castro LD
    Not Polit; 2002; 18(67):120-2. PubMed ID: 15282929
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ethics committees in the United States.
    Capron AM
    Not Polit; 2002; 18(67):87-94. PubMed ID: 15282924
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Research ethics boards--operational issues II.
    Maire A
    NCEHR Commun; 1999; 9(2):14-6. PubMed ID: 15540382
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Research ethics boards--operational issues I.
    Lynch A
    NCEHR Commun; 1999; 9(2):9-14. PubMed ID: 15540381
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Making research ethics review work in Zimbabwe--the case for investment in local capacity.
    Mielke J; Ndebele P
    Cent Afr J Med; 2004; 50(11-12):115-9. PubMed ID: 16615661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Composition and operation of selected research ethics review committees in Latin America.
    Rivera R; Ezcurra E
    IRB; 2001; 23(5):9-12. PubMed ID: 12737173
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Resource and needs of research ethics committees in Africa: preparations for HIV vaccine trials.
    Milford C; Wassenaar D; Slack C
    IRB; 2006; 28(2):1-9. PubMed ID: 16770882
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Recurrent issues in the review of medical research on human subjects.
    Moore DL
    Albany Law J Sci Technol; 1991; 1():1-33. PubMed ID: 16296123
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A cultural understanding of research ethics governance.
    Brunger F; Burgess M
    Health Law Rev; 2005; 13(2-3):69-74. PubMed ID: 16459417
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Concept paper: a virtual centralized IRB system.
    McWilliams R; Hebden CW; Gilpin AM
    Account Res; 2006; 13(1):25-45. PubMed ID: 16770858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cooperative research ethics review boards: a win-win solution?
    Koski G; Aungst J; Kupersmith J; Getz K; Rimoin D
    IRB; 2005; 27(3):1-7. PubMed ID: 16021793
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Module five: implementation of ethics review.
    Dhai A
    Dev World Bioeth; 2005 Mar; 5(1):73-91. PubMed ID: 15748179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of the ethical review process in Sudan.
    Elsayed DE; Kass NE
    Dev World Bioeth; 2007 Dec; 7(3):143-8. PubMed ID: 18021119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Regional perspectives in research ethics: a report from Bangladesh.
    Harun-Ar-Rashid
    East Mediterr Health J; 2006; 12 Suppl 1():S66-72. PubMed ID: 17037691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The practical logic of reasonableness: an ethnographic reconnaissance of a research ethics committee.
    Parker DB; James M; Barrett RJ
    Monash Bioeth Rev; 2005 Oct; 24(4):7-27. PubMed ID: 16459428
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ethical decision making in committee: the role of review boards and ethics committees in health care, health policy, and medical research.
    Sass HM
    Taiwan Yi Xue Ren Wen Xue Kan; 2000 Nov; 1(1):8-26. PubMed ID: 15008173
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Research ethics boards: size, not money.
    Hill J
    PLoS Med; 2006 Oct; 3(10):e457; author reply e460, e471. PubMed ID: 17076570
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Status of ethical review and challenges in India.
    Muthuswamy V
    Indian Pediatr; 2005 Dec; 42(12):1189-90. PubMed ID: 16424554
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The need to understand IRB deliberations.
    Candilis PJ; Lidz CW; Arnold RM
    IRB; 2006; 28(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 16680872
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ethics committee reviews and mutual acceptance: a pilot study.
    Rosenthal MA; Sarson-Lawrence M; Alt C; Arkell K; Dodds M;
    Intern Med J; 2005 Nov; 35(11):650-4. PubMed ID: 16248858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.