207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15284156)
1. View from the research and development office.
Soteriou T
BMJ; 2004 Jul; 329(7460):281-2. PubMed ID: 15284156
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The other face of research governance.
Jones AM; Bamford B
BMJ; 2004 Jul; 329(7460):280-1. PubMed ID: 15284155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The ethics and governance of medical research: what does regulation have to do with morality?
Ashcroft RE
New Rev Bioeth; 2003 Nov; 1(1):41-58. PubMed ID: 15706668
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Bureaucracy of ethics applications.
Wald DS
BMJ; 2004 Jul; 329(7460):282-4. PubMed ID: 15284157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A view from the USA.
Freeman WL
Monash Bioeth Rev; 2003 Oct; 22(4):38-44. PubMed ID: 15069964
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Research ethics paperwork: what is the plot we seem to have lost?
Jamrozik K
BMJ; 2004 Jul; 329(7460):286-7. PubMed ID: 15284159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Do all services provided as part of a clinical trial require research ethics and governance review?
Kenner J; Zalcberg JR
Intern Med J; 2017 Oct; 47(10):1197-1199. PubMed ID: 28994255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reconsidering 'ethics' and 'quality' in healthcare research: the case for an iterative ethical paradigm.
Stevenson FA; Gibson W; Pelletier C; Chrysikou V; Park S
BMC Med Ethics; 2015 May; 16():21. PubMed ID: 25952678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Applying for ethical approval for research: the main issues.
Gelling L
Nurs Stand; 2016 Jan; 30(20):40-4. PubMed ID: 26758167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Research bureaucracy in the United Kingdom: ask for help.
Reid CM
BMJ; 2004 Sep; 329(7466):624. PubMed ID: 15361459
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative Canadian Aboriginal perspectives on Draft Values and Ethics in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Research.
Kaufert JM; Lavoie JG
Monash Bioeth Rev; 2003 Oct; 22(4):31-7. PubMed ID: 15069963
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The task for ethics review: should research ethics boards address an approach or a paradigm?
Nelson CH; McPherson DH
NCEHR Commun; 2004; 12(2):11-22. PubMed ID: 15460563
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The ethical bureaucracy.
Martyn C
QJM; 2003 May; 96(5):323-4. PubMed ID: 12702780
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The reform of UK research ethics committees: throwing the baby out with the bath water?
Kerrison S; Pollock AM
J Med Ethics; 2005 Aug; 31(8):487-9. PubMed ID: 16076976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Ethical review of research in the grey area. The Ethical Review Act should be widened and case management more efficient].
Lafolie P; Agahi N
Lakartidningen; 2015 Feb; 112():. PubMed ID: 25710225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An indigenous New Zealand health researcher's perspective.
Cunningham C
Monash Bioeth Rev; 2003 Oct; 22(4):26-30. PubMed ID: 15069962
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Ethics review in research: ethics committees are risk averse.
Minnis HJ
BMJ; 2004 Mar; 328(7441):710-1. PubMed ID: 15031253
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Ethics review of research: in pursuit of proportionality.
Edwards SJ; Omar R
J Med Ethics; 2008 Jul; 34(7):568-72. PubMed ID: 18591296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. United Kingdom research governance strategy.
Kerrison S; McNally N; Pollock AM
BMJ; 2003 Sep; 327(7414):553-6. PubMed ID: 12958119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Research bureaucracy in the United Kingdom: seeking a balance: response from the Department of Health and COREC.
Pattison J; Stacey T
BMJ; 2004 Sep; 329(7466):622. PubMed ID: 15361450
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
