These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15284159)
1. Research ethics paperwork: what is the plot we seem to have lost? Jamrozik K BMJ; 2004 Jul; 329(7460):286-7. PubMed ID: 15284159 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The other face of research governance. Jones AM; Bamford B BMJ; 2004 Jul; 329(7460):280-1. PubMed ID: 15284155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. View from the research and development office. Soteriou T BMJ; 2004 Jul; 329(7460):281-2. PubMed ID: 15284156 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Ethical review of research into rare genetic disorders. Parker M; Ashcroft R; Wilkie AO; Kent A BMJ; 2004 Jul; 329(7460):288-9. PubMed ID: 15284160 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of the ethical review process in Sudan. Elsayed DE; Kass NE Dev World Bioeth; 2007 Dec; 7(3):143-8. PubMed ID: 18021119 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Ethics review in research: time has come for reassessment. McKee M BMJ; 2004 Mar; 328(7441):711. PubMed ID: 15031254 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Making research ethics review work in Zimbabwe--the case for investment in local capacity. Mielke J; Ndebele P Cent Afr J Med; 2004; 50(11-12):115-9. PubMed ID: 16615661 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ethical oversight of research in developing countries. Kass N; Dawson L; Loyo-Berrios NI IRB; 2003; 25(2):1-10. PubMed ID: 12833901 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The ethical bureaucracy. Martyn C QJM; 2003 May; 96(5):323-4. PubMed ID: 12702780 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Research oversight through new lenses: the consortium to examine clinical research ethics. Sugarman J; Eckenwiler LA; Emanuel EJ IRB; 2003; 25(1):9-10. PubMed ID: 12833899 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Ethical review of research in the grey area. The Ethical Review Act should be widened and case management more efficient]. Lafolie P; Agahi N Lakartidningen; 2015 Feb; 112():. PubMed ID: 25710225 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Time for professionalising the system of medical ethics review in the Netherlands]. de Vogel E; Cleophas TJ; Cleophas GC Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2003 Nov; 147(45):2255; author reply 2255. PubMed ID: 14640067 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Ethics committees in Asia. de Castro LD Not Polit; 2002; 18(67):120-2. PubMed ID: 15282929 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A cultural understanding of research ethics governance. Brunger F; Burgess M Health Law Rev; 2005; 13(2-3):69-74. PubMed ID: 16459417 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Teaching research ethics through role-play and discussion. Rosnow RL Teach Psychol; 1990 Oct; 17(3):179-81. PubMed ID: 11651045 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The task for ethics review: should research ethics boards address an approach or a paradigm? Nelson CH; McPherson DH NCEHR Commun; 2004; 12(2):11-22. PubMed ID: 15460563 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The forum. A contextualized approach to IRB review for collaborative international research. Kelley SD Ethics Behav; 2002; 12(4):371-6. PubMed ID: 12678073 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Health science research ethics: a critique. Coburn D Health Law Can; 1993; 13(3):192-6. PubMed ID: 10125790 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]