These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. Introduction to special issue of Accountability in Research on the review and approval of biomedical research proposals: a call for a centralized national human research protections system. Mann H; Shamoo AE Account Res; 2006; 13(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 16770856 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Social experiments and prior ethical review: the Judicial Conference experiment. Robertson JA IRB; 1981 Apr; 3(4):1-3. PubMed ID: 11661943 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. A new approach to assessing ethical conduct in scientific work. Helton-Fauth W; Gaddis B; Scott G; Mumford M; Devenport L; Connelly S; Brown R Account Res; 2003; 10(4):205-28. PubMed ID: 14989284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. When to seek ethical review for a study. McCluskey A Aust Occup Ther J; 2009 Dec; 56(6):371. PubMed ID: 20854547 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Research ethics and the "fieldwork monitoring committee". Herrera C IRB; 2000; 22(6):11-3. PubMed ID: 11883484 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. [Obtaining medical ethical approval for a multicentre, randomised study: prospective evaluation of a ponderous process]. Bosch FH; Klazinga NS; Schaffmeister BE Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2009 Jan; 153(4):154. PubMed ID: 19348140 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Views of the process and content of ethical reviews of HIV vaccine trials among members of US institutional review boards and South African research ethics committees. Klitzman R Dev World Bioeth; 2008 Dec; 8(3):207-18. PubMed ID: 19046258 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [The system for ethical review falters]. Thörn Å Lakartidningen; 2015 Nov; 112():. PubMed ID: 26660964 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Transforming a personal inquiry into a research project: case study. Pattullo EL IRB; 1981 Apr; 3(4):5-6. PubMed ID: 11661945 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Random-sampling: a modest proposal for reforming IRB review. Caplan AL IRB; 1982; 4(6):8. PubMed ID: 11649188 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Ethical and legal considerations in dental caries research involving human subjects. Branson R J Dent Res; 1980 Jul; 59(Special Issue C):1214-364. PubMed ID: 11651755 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Undergraduate research and the institutional review board: a mismatch or happy marriage? Kallgren CA; Tauber RT Teach Psychol; 1996 Feb; 23(1):20-5. PubMed ID: 11655063 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Protection of human subjects. United States Code Fed Regul Shipping; 1982 Oct; Part 46, Sections 46.101 to 46.306():. PubMed ID: 11660819 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. IRB review as a "cooling out" device. Levine M; Lathrop VG IRB; 1983; 5(4):8-10. PubMed ID: 11649522 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. An act...to establish a program of National Research Service Awards...and to provide for the protection of human subjects involved in biomedical and behavioral research.... Approved 12 Jul 1974. U.S US Statut Large; 1974; 88 342-354():2-354. PubMed ID: 12085916 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. The report of the Advisory Research Committee on the ethics review of research involving human subjects. Queens Gazette; 1974 : 1-5, 30 Jan; 6(4) Suppl):. PubMed ID: 11663457 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Proprietary hospital good place for research--Humana official. Zenger GH Am Med News; 1985 Apr; 28(16):28. PubMed ID: 11649597 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Ethical review of research protocols: experience of a research ethics committee. Martín-Arribas MC; Rodríguez-Lozano I; Arias-Díaz J Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed); 2012 Jun; 65(6):525-9. PubMed ID: 22464100 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]