BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

692 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15284779)

  • 1. Comparison of laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy with traditional hysterectomy for cost-effectiveness to employers.
    Lenihan JP; Kovanda C; Cammarano C
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jun; 190(6):1714-20; discussion 1720-2. PubMed ID: 15284779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy at a health maintenance organization. Cost-effectiveness and comparison with total abdominal hysterectomy.
    Bornstein SJ; Shaber RE
    J Reprod Med; 1995 Jun; 40(6):435-8. PubMed ID: 7650655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Open abdominal versus laparoscopic and vaginal hysterectomy: analysis of a large United States payer measuring quality and cost of care.
    Warren L; Ladapo JA; Borah BJ; Gunnarsson CL
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2009; 16(5):581-8. PubMed ID: 19835801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Costs and charges associated with three alternative techniques of hysterectomy.
    Dorsey JH; Holtz PM; Griffiths RI; McGrath MM; Steinberg EP
    N Engl J Med; 1996 Aug; 335(7):476-82. PubMed ID: 8672153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy vs. abdominal hysterectomy in a community hospital. A cost comparison.
    Simon NV; Laveran RL; Cavanaugh S; Gerlach DH; Jackson JR
    J Reprod Med; 1999 Apr; 44(4):339-45. PubMed ID: 10319303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of total laparoscopic hysterectomy to robotically assisted hysterectomy: surgical outcomes in a community practice.
    Payne TN; Dauterive FR
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(3):286-91. PubMed ID: 18439499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A clinical pathway for laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy. Impact on costs and clinical outcome.
    Chang WC; Lin CC
    J Reprod Med; 2003 Apr; 48(4):247-51. PubMed ID: 12746988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Laparoscopy vs. laparotomy for gynecologic procedures. Impact on resident training.
    Sultana CJ; Sogor L
    J Reprod Med; 1996 Apr; 41(4):225-30. PubMed ID: 8728072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hospital cost comparison between abdominal, vaginal, and laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomies.
    Nezhat C; Bess O; Admon D; Nezhat CH; Nezhat F
    Obstet Gynecol; 1994 May; 83(5 Pt 1):713-6. PubMed ID: 8164929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a matched case-control study.
    Sarlos D; Kots L; Stevanovic N; Schaer G
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2010 May; 150(1):92-6. PubMed ID: 20207063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Laparoscopic hysterectomy. Supracervical vs. assisted vaginal.
    Schwartz RO
    J Reprod Med; 1994 Aug; 39(8):625-30. PubMed ID: 7996527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy and total abdominal hysterectomy outcomes.
    Sarmini OR; Lefholz K; Froeschke HP
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2005; 12(2):121-4. PubMed ID: 15904614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cost-effectiveness analysis of the treatment of large leiomyomas: laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy.
    Mittapalli R; Fanning J; Flora R; Fenton BW
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 May; 196(5):e19-21. PubMed ID: 17466667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Analysis of survival after laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy compared with the conventional abdominal approach for early-stage endometrial carcinoma: a review of the literature.
    Gil-Moreno A; Díaz-Feijoo B; Morchón S; Xercavins J
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2006; 13(1):26-35. PubMed ID: 16431320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessing the role of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy in the everyday practice of gynecology.
    Han GS
    J Reprod Med; 1996 Jul; 41(7):521-8. PubMed ID: 8829066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy in a university hospital. Decreasing the need for abdominal hysterectomy and increasing resident experience in vaginal surgery.
    Fylstra DL; Carter JF
    J Reprod Med; 1996 Jul; 41(7):497-503. PubMed ID: 8829062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: cost analysis and review of initial experience in a community hospital.
    Messina MJ; Garavaglia MM; Walsh RT; Turke GD; Amenta RE
    J Am Osteopath Assoc; 1995 Jan; 95(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 7860366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Randomized comparison of laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy with standard vaginal hysterectomy in an outpatient setting.
    Summitt RL; Stovall TG; Lipscomb GH; Ling FW
    Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Dec; 80(6):895-901. PubMed ID: 1448255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative costs of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy.
    East M
    N Z Med J; 1994 Sep; 107(986 Pt 1):371-4. PubMed ID: 7936464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Types of hysterectomy. Comparison of characteristics, hospital costs, utilization and outcomes.
    Campbell ES; Xiao H; Smith MK
    J Reprod Med; 2003 Dec; 48(12):943-9. PubMed ID: 14738021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 35.